Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
They suck. Skeleton of last years squad. Save your money. |
tiamat1478 | 7 |
|
![]() |
@TheBoyWonder My post had nothing to do about the HC. Know nothing about him nor do I care to |
TJZags598 | 14 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Everybody's Tex Winter after the game. To be frank, New York is just hands down better than Detroit. Cade has been amazing. Hardaway Jr's minutes are all about trying to find a more scoring out of that roster. Tobias Harris, I swear, is completely happy with doing juat enough after years of mediocrity in Philly. Homie should be dropping 25 a night for this team. Schroeder provided seemingly did nothing and Ausar should've gotten some of his minutes but honestly, Ausar and Holland's lack of nurn was probably because they don't provide much offensively. They held the Knicks to 94 and had every opportunity to win this game, including a questionable call at the end, which the league has already admitted they got wrong. This team is one legitimate scoring threat away from competing. They're young and the future is bright for them.
Hands down better? They needed a 21-0 run at home and then had two wins by a total of 3 points. One the league immediately said was an error in officiating. Pretty evenly matched teams |
TJZags598 | 14 |
|
![]() |
That’s crazy they can review a play for possession and then apply a foul that gives 2 free throws to make it a 3 pt game…. Line 2.5. nothing fishy about that |
Drew61 | 6 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by HockeyNight11:
A few popular picks this year & an interesting stat to chew on.. Teams who started unranked and finished ranked in the top 10 of the AP poll, earning a #1 or #2 seed in the tournament along the way are a combined 0 for 37 when it comes to making the final 4. This year has two qualifiers: St. Johns and Michigan State 63% (15 of 24) of the 2 seeds that meet that mold have not survived the opening weekend.
Updated for 2026 bracket pickers 0 for 39 and the Johnnies don’t survive the opening weekend. |
HockeyNight11 | 4 |
|
![]() |
@msucurt Prob done that 10x lol it happens. Always ok to take a few days off. Don’t chase the losses wait for the one you like… |
msucurt | 16 |
|
![]() |
@msucurt They were covering for 99.8% of the game weren’t they? Woulda been a pretty lucky MSU cover but that’s just me |
KC_4_LIFE | 62 |
|
![]() |
@Mardyball |
Mardyball | 18 |
|
![]() |
Michigan Florida
Houston Duke
Florida over Houston |
kidsmoney | 19 |
|
![]() |
Was just going to post this. Much has been made about the 10-0 start. But pretty sure the top seed that we beat was a 10 before Michigan beat A&M…. I brought up a stat pre tourney about how teams not ranked in the top 25 preseason and finished top 10 in the AP earning a 1/2 seed were 0-38 in making the final 4 and only like 9 of 24 had survived the first weekend… St John’s and MSU were the qualifiers this year. The Johnnie’s made it 0-39 and 9 of 25. MSU might be in for a fight tonight. This is the game they just gotta survive imo. Conference is looking overrated per usual now |
newmarket | 3 |
|
![]() |
@ByrdMane612 |
ByrdMane612 | 8 |
|
![]() |
Yesterday 4-2 tournament: 9-10
1) Baylor +12.5 2) Colorado St +8.5
|
HockeyNight11 | 3 |
|
![]() |
B1G is 10-0 SU and 10-0 ATS…. What could go wrong Wisconsin? |
HockeyNight11 | 17 |
|
![]() |
@Mardyball Haaaaiiiill yeah! |
Mardyball | 18 |
|
![]() |
@thehuntman I need it |
HockeyNight11 | 17 |
|
![]() |
Blue!! Unreal job by Dusty and crew. 6 straight sweet 16’s for Michigan in their last 6 tourney appearances. |
HockeyNight11 | 17 |
|
![]() |
@jesron1269 Guys that tends to happen when you don’t have any bigs & are up against 7 footers who can move. anyway I’ll trade 5 of your iffy calls for the 12 missed layups by Michigan if you’re interested |
KC_4_LIFE | 56 |
|
![]() |
Add: On Wisconsin ML |
HockeyNight11 | 17 |
|
![]() |
Well Meeechigan missed about 8 layups and only down by 4 at half. |
Mardyball | 18 |
|
![]() |
|
Mardyball | 18 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.