Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935: Nice hit spot I noticed it's 4-19, weeks 4-9 to bad there weren't more per year, last year only saw one at week 10. I'll put this one in my rare list.
season>2009 and H and F and p:D and pp:D and o:streak<1 and rest=6 and ats streak<3 and week<13 and n:D and p:points<31 and line<=-2
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo: Jowchoo, what site did you get this one to get 23-0?
Quote Originally Posted by hoody: season>=2016 and AD and 9>line>2 and week<7 and op:AL if this works it's almost 70% but it's not 23-0, now lets see if it copied and pasted include the filters from post 68 then you get 23-0 |
jowchoo | 133 |
|
![]() |
jowchoo, I have the edit on mine, dont know why you don't |
jowchoo | 133 |
|
![]() |
season>=2016 and AD and 9>line>2 and week<7 and op:AL if this works it's almost 70% but it's not 23-0, now lets see if it copied and pasted |
jowchoo | 133 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
RTD is another line of scrimmage indicator. season=2024 and tA(RTD)-tA(o:RTD)>1.1 and line>-14 and H (15-2) 88%...this needs to be tracked. This only has 5 teams in 2024 add (and week and team) or just add and team, if you look at 2023 your 10-9 i think but your 68% OV, I think this would be a tough one to track. |
jowchoo | 133 |
|
![]() |
season=2024 and week>1 and sacks/o:sacks>1 and p:W 55-22-1 ats (71.4%) In the teaser records +6 it's 71-7 (91%) season=2024 and week>1 and TO-o:TO>1 This one is 17-80(17.5%) In the teaser records -6 it's 8-90 (8.2%) On to the CFL buddy and if you add p:L it's (14%) ats and 3-54 in teaser records -6 (5.3%) |
jowchoo | 133 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
season=2024 and AD and week>16 and 51>total>41.5 and day=Sunday (8-2) Here is an 80% trend to the over with games this weekend in play. Thing with this is most of it is week 17&18 This would be half my teaser SU: 1-5 ATS: 3-3 OU: 6-0 season=2024 and AD and DIV and week>16 and 51>total>41.5 and day=Sunday (6-0) So if this is half my teaser drop the line to 41.5 and play the OV and it;s 14.9-100% this year so I still need another half, note the 1-5 SU says the Eagles win and the game goes OV Now I play around with Jowchoo"s on yours you can play A,D,F,H and get 10-3 season=2024 and D and week>16 and 51>total>41.5 and day=Sunday SU: 11-2 6.9- 76.9% Note this is as D so the S/U Was-Buf ATS:7-6 OU:10-3 I like this teaser Jowchoo |
Indigo999 | 177 |
|
![]() |
Here's a small one for ya buddy ACD and playoffs=1 and DIV and p:margin>8 and total>46 It's 4-0 ats on Wash 0-3-1 U/N |
Indigo999 | 177 |
|
![]() |
@ begginerboy I get S/U: 18-12 ATS: 11-18 OU: 12-16-2 |
Indigo999 | 177 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams: Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999: 18) A playoff away dog that passed for less than 150 yards the previous game.....29-17 ATS (+1.9), 19-27 straight up (-2.9).....if instead the line is between -4 and +4 this moves to 15-4 ATS (+3.4), 12-7 straight up (+2.4).......Bills query text.......playoffs=1 and p:passing yards<150 and A and -4 Great query. I strongly favor BUF and appreciate the extra support. We'll see if I can get this entire angle posted correctly......................... playoffs=1 and p:passing yards<150 and A and the line is between -4 and 4 Could not get his to post with the right query language...."shame on you covers". @Indigo999 Mahomes is the chosen one and current golden boy after Brady retired. Storyline all year has been can KC be the first team ever to 3peat. Refs will be helping KC in a close game. It’s hard to beat a team twice in the same season and the Bills win earlier this year was in Buffalo. Riding the Mahomes vs Allen trend in the playoffs 3-0. Some teams just have the other teams number. 20) An away dog in the conference championship round whose present opponent won more than 14 games last season.....5-1 ATS (+5.2), 2-4 SU (-1.3).......Bills Mahomes is the chosen one and current golden boy after Brady retired. Storyline all year has been can KC be the first team ever to 3peat. Refs will be helping KC in a close game. It’s hard to beat a team twice in the same season and the Bills win earlier this year was in Buffalo. Riding the Mahomes vs Allen trend in the playoffs 3-0. Some teams just have the other teams number. Are you trying to argue with me?....don't take it personally that I like the Bills....if you like the Chiefs, all well and good, they obviously have been doing quite a bit right the past few years.....they could very easily win this game in Arrowwood. When you say "it's hard to beat a team twice in a season" what facts do you have to back that up? The fact is, teams in this round are 18-14 straight up when a team won the previous matchup.....16-16 ATS straight up. I suppose because you know when the league wants one team to win you'd own your own tropical island and a few mansions, equivalent to Biff having his own personal sports almanac.The fact is, teams in this round are 18-14 straight up when a team won the previous matchup.....16-16 ATS. Makes me go |
Indigo999 | 177 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935:
@JFEEZEE The website we,I use has no info on weather. That would be something to keep notes of for future games. Track it on west coast dogs ir something like that. In the other hand, talk about scarce and limited data. over 20+ years maybe only a few games. Besides these snow,wind, rain games are prone for mistakes. Who gets the bounces? Maybe having a decent amount of points matters most. Spottie did yours on killer <40 for temp (8-0) Rams and 2-6 UN) (10-1 temp<50 and 3-8 UN) can't get things to work on the dog, as you can see from yesterday sometimes it works some time it doesn't, I felt like Jowchoo trying to copy and paste, and I just talked with Indigo999 yesterday telling him this stuff isn't going through.
playoffs = 1 and AD and rest<7 and o:rest > 5 and line<8 and p:points<39 and p:site = home and t:wins<15 and opo:points<32 and 15>PRSW>2 and temperature<40
|
Indigo999 | 50 |
|
![]() |
# 23 only part of it showed up, and I know it makes a difference between game type =DR and playoffs>=1 |
Indigo999 | 50 |
|
![]() |
playoffs >=1 and H and tA(RY) |
Indigo999 | 50 |
|
![]() |
game type=DR and and H and F and o:playoffs>=1 and line<=6 and surface=grass (32-23 1 S/U) (20-25-1) same as O/U Play on LA & Hou |
Indigo999 | 50 |
|
![]() |
playoffs>=1 and H and F and o:playoffs>=1 and line<=6 and surface=grass and po:F and day=Saturday |
Indigo999 | 50 |
|
![]() |
[Quote: Originally Posted by jowchoo]Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999: Correction in angle number 17 it should read..... "A non-Sunday away team that won more than 5 away games, playing in the wildcard round" Query text....playoffs = 1 and tS(W@A, N=8)>5 and A and p:playoffs=0 and day!=Sunday THX indigoo..............................gl this WC weekend! btw: How do you query, how a team did the prior year with respect to their ats record at home/on the road?[/Quote] team=Ravens and season=2023 and H,A (this should show last year, s/u , ats, and o/u if this is what your looking for? |
Indigo999 | 34 |
|
![]() |
Don't be surprised if they move the Rams game to ARI if the fires don't slow down. Heard that this morning. |
Indigo999 | 34 |
|
![]() |
here's another, back to 2002 (12-1-2) 92% OV playoffs=1 and conference=AFC and DIV and F and time zone=E |
kcblitzkrieg | 27 |
|
![]() |
game type=WC and DIV and season>=2019 (12-2-0) to the OV 85.7% |
kcblitzkrieg | 27 |
|
![]() |
game type=WC and playoffs=1 and HF and o:playoffs=1 and op:W and line>=-4 (7-20 ats and 8-18 UN) Play WASH and UN |
jowchoo | 36 |
|
![]() |
|
TheGoldenGoose | 81 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.