Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Jesse_James | 9 |
|
|
Absolutely pathetic from Taro Daniel unfortunately 1-3, -1.83u
ATP Sydney International 250, Men's Singles, R2 |
Jesse_James | 9 |
|
|
ATP Sydney International 250, Men's Singles, R2 Gilles Simon had a good run in Pune where he fell short to Anderson but had been playing well. In comparison to the guy Querrey played, his opponents have been superior and he in my opinion is better on the return of serve. I don't know what to expect of Querrey going forward but at least with Simon I know what I am going to expect based of what I've seen from him in 2019 so far. |
Jesse_James | 9 |
|
|
ATP Sydney International 250, Men's Singles, R1 |
Jesse_James | 9 |
|
|
1-2, -0.83u ATP Sydney International 250, Mens Singles, R2 I dont feel like there is a big difference as the odds indicate and I think Taro Daniel is a potential winner for this matchup. Whilst he hasn't been as successful on the ITF/Challenger Tour I think he's handled the transition to the ATP Tour better, as with Jordan Thompson I feel like we hear about him more in January when it is the Australian Summer. |
Jesse_James | 9 |
|
|
^Sorry that was meant to be -1.5 Set Handicap ATP Brisbane International 250, Mens Singles, R2 |
Jesse_James | 9 |
|
|
YTD: 0 - 1, (-1.00u) ATP Brisbane International 250, Mens Singles, R2 |
Jesse_James | 9 |
|
|
ATP Brisbane International 250, Mens Singles, R2 |
Jesse_James | 9 |
|
|
Donny VP Rightside is on the Falcons -3.5 so Buccs +3.5 is great |
anthonyline | 13 |
|
|
1-2-2, -$107.5 Gonna be a fun US Open in this heat with all these retirements, one would like to hope the ones that look like winning and the ones that don’t even up in the course of one’s time betting but the two voided ones could have just as quickly lost too so it could have been much worse. John Isner -4.5 @ 1.97 (Pinnacle) Isner has seemingly cracked through the slam barrier making his first ever Grand Slam SF at Wimbledon after having not played since the French Open and he is in a tournament where without a doubt the home fans will cheer him on and he will thrive under that. His record at the US Open is pretty good (maybe not great) but he hasn’t exited early since 2008 where he lost in 1R. Whilst there are seemingly question marks over Isners ability to close out matches as he prefers to play longer ones he is playing a guy who specialises on clay and whos only slam win came against Krajinovic in four sets who hadn’t played in months. Whilst Jarry at times has been exciting young player to watch I’ll go with the proven experience and powerful serve behind Isner here. Jack Sock -4, 1.952 (Pinnacle) More or less, for similar reasons as Isner's going with a guy playing on home soil who should be capable of beating his opponent, being more conditioned to the US temperatures despite sometimes fitness issues and playing a guy with little success here. He beat Bedene in the first round who's neither a noted US soil guy nor is he a hardcourts guy having only made it past the 1R here in 2015 in 5 attempts. |
Jesse_James | 9 |
|
|
Seems like the heat and humid weather is playing a big part in the results so far, if this keeps up it could quite basically be Nadals US Open to lose, although it'll probably be cooler later on in September as well as playing in a later time. Looks like it affected McDonald today which is a shame, as it was my favourite bet. Nothing to do with Haase being good and winning the match on his own racquet so I can live with those sorts of losses as much as it hurts. Ironically it seems to be benefitting Monfils in his match who usually struggles hard with his fitness so it's a nice turnaround. |
Jesse_James | 9 |
|
|
Anything in particular that makes you like him more? I'm just not a fan of it at that price/line offered. Also I'm not sure how he will handle the slower surface compared to Taro Daniel. Also popped in to post one more bet for the day Gael Monfils -5.5 @ 1.925 (Pinnacle) Couldnt really find a whole lot of games I really loved personally going through the whole board, a lot I really liked otherwise but not as confident. Still I guess as it's been shown anyone can beat anyone on their day ey? Anderson struggled etc. Normally not as much of a fan of backing Monfils as early as well with little match practice but he's clearly a class above a lesser player who is more of a clay guy. |
Jesse_James | 9 |
|
|
Taro Daniel +4, 1.99 (Pinnacle) I am a fan of De Minaur but I don't feel like he should be that heavy of a favourite. Taro Daniel showed some great tennis and seems to be making a good mark on the hard courts in recent years. I know he is more known for being a clay court player but he's playing a guy who's smaller physique doesn't seem to be as great for the slams at this point in time with his lack of experience. I feel the odds should be much closer then this and see this being as a much more competitive match. Marin Cilic/Marius Copil Under 34 Games, 1.961 (Pinnacle) Despite the big disappointment at Wimbledon, the expectations are back on for Marin Cilic, and I'm too one of those expecting big things from him in this tournament. I think that despite the results at Cincinnati I've seen enough from Cilic to believe he has a few extra gears in him to win this match comfortably, especially if it's a slower surface as rumoured. |
Jesse_James | 9 |
|
|
Not entirely bothered scrolling back to the pages to find my other thread so i'll make a new one for the last slam of the year. From what I've seen in qualifiers and players in practice and it seems that the courts look a bit slower this year and high bouncing. Hopefully there are less weather delays and it's a good tournament. Thank goodness they can play as long as they want in this slam! Mackenzie McDonald +4, 1.869 (Pinnacle) I have been following this guys form all year and it seems like it's been a bit of a breakthrough despite being 23 (turned pro in 2016). The guy plays hard at the slams and has notched up an impressive 4 wins on those best of 5 set surfaces. And yes, I know it's no secret that I enjoy backing him (based off Wimbledon etc) but he's flown under the radar a bit into his countrymen who get more mentions such as Francis Tiafoe and Taylor Fritz. Marcos Baghdatis/Mikhail Youhzny Over 36.5 Games, 1.961 (Pinnacle) I found it interesting that out of over 30 matches played in the mens singles there were only 3 matches that went to five sets, and about half of those were 3 sets. So today I looked through the entire board of matches to see what kind of matchups there were, and what kind of totals there were whether I thought they had the potential to be five set matches or matches where there's no way there would be three matches, then this one stood out to me. |
Jesse_James | 9 |
|
|
Wimbledon SW19, Womens Singles, Final Angelique Kerber vs Serena Williams Totak Score: Over 22 Games @ 2.00 Stake: $300 |
Jesse_James | 51 |
|
|
Novak Djokovic Moneyline @ 1.952 Stake: $200 Nadal made a good go of beating Del Potro and could live with getting that one wrong. But I think Djokovic presents a whole more pain of a matchup on grass on Nadal compared to other surfaces. Ill try and be brief with why I think so :P For those that remember their Wimbledon Final from 2011, and the French Open Final will know why things favour Djokovic. And no, the fact these matches were 6-7 years ago is irrelevant. Those that remember Djokovic running out of steam against Nadal in 2007 were probably not surprised that he dominated him in that 2011 Wimbledon Final. The reason why I compared the 2012 French Open Final to the Wimbledon 2011 Final, and why the script may be similar this time around is as follows... Nadal plays a game which basically states straight up "I am better than anyone at hitting balls into positions where you can't attack me without taking huge risks, and I can do it longer than anyone". Watch the angle that his balls bounce as they cross the baseline. He gets them jumping up near vertical. So a normal player (on clay) has to take huge risks because they know they can't compete with his game. Players that don't have an alternate game (Ferrer) just get chopped. So for Nadal this will work against, effectively, nearly everyone bar Novak. When the rain came in on that day, Novak completely changed his shot selection to the sort of game he plays on hard court. Effectively he's trying to open the court up on nearly every shot even if it means being exposed. The reason why it's so effective is because the ball is bouncing lower now so when Nadal tries to take advantage and 'rip' the ball away the spin just doesn't have the same effect. So Novak feels safer hitting the ball to open up the court because he knows he can't be hurt. He's getting his body behind the ball so that he can use the ground reactive force in his legs to get the extra power. And he knows he can do it because Nadal can't take him out of court as much, so he's willing to do the extra running Djokovic usually wants to take those risks because it opens the court up and he's fast enough to get to Nadal's response. On a dry clay court though Djokovic's flat attacking balls get held up and then the spin from Nadal just puts the ball way too far out of court for it to be a winning strategy. As the court gets wet, Djokovic's flat attacking shots still get held up, but Nadal's response isn't as devastating because a wet ball doesn't bounce the same. So now Djokovic is willing to take the risk because he knows he can get back across the court and in doing so he's opened up the whole court for both players which is where he is significantly better than Nadal. And Nadal knows it too. It's exactly the same as their Wimbledon final. And it's why the media made a big deal about him wanting to suspend play. Effectively Novak uses aggressive movement, aggressive shot selection. And he's got enough speed and endurance to do it for long periods of time. Nadal knows and he hates it heh.
|
Jesse_James | 51 |
|
|
John Isner Moneyline @ 1.925 (Pinnacle) Well I certainly made a good call on Anderson making a match out of it, hah. Probably was the match of the tournament for mine IMO. Had a bit of a soft spot for him after he got injured so it's good to see him back on the horse. Though Isner has looked more unhittable I think. I've underrated him and it's paid dearly. But I wonder how much legs Anderson will have from that match the other day and whether mentally he left it all out there in his QF and whether he has enough now. I was initially likening to riding his form because he's played very well but this time I'm going to side with John Isner. He made Raonic look ordinary and I think if there is someone to crack first I think it will be Anderson.
|
Jesse_James | 51 |
|
|
20 - 19, +$266.20 Close, but not close enough. Thought the Djokovic violation was clear nonsense also which came after he missed break point chances and led to him being distracted. As always the umpires discretion is usually inconsistent. Oh well, moving on to the last three mens matches. |
Jesse_James | 51 |
|
|
Milos Raonic -1.5 @ 2.02 (Pinnacle) This matchup will be hard to predict with both guys who have big serves, but I have given the edge to Raonic because I think he is more likely to break. And I feel Isner hasn't really played anyone that has looked like threatening his serve despite an impressive three set win against Tsitpasis. Raonic has been here to the QF and is looking more and more confident in each game he plays. I see no real value taking the line so i'll take the extra 30 odd cents on the small handicap and hope its enough. Juan Martin Del Potro +4.5 @ 1.99 (Pinnacle) |
Jesse_James | 51 |
|
|
Roger Federer/Kevin Anderson Over 34.5 Games @ 1.925 (Pinnacle) I think this will be Roger's first real test as he has not really been pushed by players who have been easy to break. Kevin Anderson as this tournament has shown is not an easy player to break. He has played good opponents and opponents who fare well on grass. He has bought his game to Wimbledon in the past pushing Novak Djokovic (eventual champion) to five sets after winning the first two sets. He also had break points in that 5th set to win the match but failed to convert them. Roger Federer has a knack of putting players in their place, ones that go on a nice run. And his h2h against Anderson indicates this. But I think Anderson has played better this time around and with a bit of a jolt in his serves it could be a real danger match for Federer to drop a set. Or even win a close one. |
Jesse_James | 51 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.