Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
I can't lie, I waited 2 minutes in before leaving to pinch a loaf.
To each their own, but this was about as generic and corporate music as one can find. A karaoke session in the middle of a football field. I much prefer JLo and her friends d from last year and I can't name any of her songs. |
EastsideBangers | 132 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by thehuntman:
My god Philadelphia is awful tonight. Can't blame the goalies tonight, it's a total team effort. Easiest night I've had in a long with nary a sweat. Amazing really. I bet two games, the Leafs and Vegas. Both have a 4-0 lead after the first.
If sports betting were this easy and relaxing, I'm not sure it would even interest me :) |
thehuntman | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by AJMay:
I'd make that bet too, regardless of who was in net. I would root for you but I'm on the Jackets
Meh, the only good news is I resisted the temptation to place a full unit on the game. Oddly enough, I was actually hoping for a 2-0 deficit this game to try and take advantage of what I felt would be a great line. i was right, but the Leafs PP didn't do me any favors.
That's gambling. |
johnnyfry | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by AJMay:
+900? Usually if a team is down 2 goals in the first it's around +400.Blackhawks are down 2-0 in the first and they were big underdogs and they're only +450 right now on my book.
I agree, one of the reasons I jumped on it, though I would have expected it to be about +600, +450 is too low for me. I think it's the fact Mattews is out, I bet on a Euro site which gives better odds than sites many sites I've seen. I expected it to be about +600, I got it at +900. Add on they are on the road and Columbus lost a similar game last time and one would think Leafs should lose.
Honestly, if Sparks was in net I don't make this bet (he will be in net tomorrow).
And it's tied game! Tavares now takes a penalty. Let's go! |
johnnyfry | 6 |
|
|
Left for the store when it was 2-0, come back and we've cut it in half. Hoping for some PP's and some offense even as 2/3rd of their top line from last year aren't in the lineup tonight, they've been stellar on the road, I try and place bets on the Leafs live when they are down 1 or 2 goals early as I've seen this movie before.
Wish me luck. Best of luck all. |
johnnyfry | 6 |
|
|
created a topic
For my brother and Sisters of NHL Covers...important info, Leafs/Kings
in NHL Betting Hello all, haven't been here this year so I pop in for a quick note for you all.
Leafs/Kings game tonight. First, Leafs don't match up very well in general, but worse, Andersen is day to day and won't be playing. I don't want to tell you who to bet for, but I won't be wagering on the Leafs if I do.
Best of luck |
johnnyfry | 1 |
|
|
Another laugher against a big favourite.
I tried to take a week off but took Steelers and thought I could squeeze two wins out. This Denver team should be booed off the field fiercely.
|
wizebettor | 34 |
|
|
You might be the nights big winner, this game is a comedy fest for Denver.
|
placeholder | 26 |
|
|
What kind of game is this?
And a guy is now 4 for 8 on the season and misses a standard 35 yard FG and still has a job? |
EastsideBangers | 9 |
|
|
I have Broncos myself at -8.5.
A little wobbly from last week Won with the Steelers today, but I hate giving almost 2 TD's to anyone. BOL all
|
EastsideBangers | 9 |
|
|
Alot of deleted posts lately, not sure why the forum has lost it's joy of discussion.
|
usarmy69-71 | 6 |
|
|
Thank you for your time. As you were.
|
johnnyfry | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Pags-Picks: This game isn't over, but this is why I took the cubbies and got laughed off the forum at......because the Nats have to prove when you are up 4-1 and s h I t the bed give up 6 straight runs bringing in starters in relief......don't see how ppl expected something different then what the NATS do every year..... Games not over though but this is why I bet the Cubs in the first place. Well, I have alot of skin in this game, 2.5 units. Luckily as it turns out, I recouped 1 unit or it would have been 3.5, as I took Nats live when they were down 1-0 in the first and Cubs loaded the bases with two outs. When it became 4-1, I took the buy out to double my half unit. In the end, this is a 2.5 unit bloodbath, in a game I felt really good about as I believe it would be high scoring as it has been. How could I expect the Cubs to outslug the Nats? Painful. I won't even watch the end of it.
|
Pags-Picks | 21 |
|
|
Honestly on one of the worst runs for me in years thanks to NFL. I won a big one last night with the Yankees, but this one is going to sting almost as much as the Vikings not covering by half a point.
Sports betting. Tough variance at times.
|
Pags-Picks | 21 |
|
|
I am watching another comical meltdown. What a killer.
|
Pags-Picks | 21 |
|
|
Another half unit live when bases were loaded for +160.
Thankfully Heyward didn't disappoint. Fingers crossed. |
johnnyfry | 3 |
|
|
Adding a runline -1.5 for a unit.
BOL all.
|
johnnyfry | 3 |
|
|
I'm with you on Nats. Might consider the runline as well.
BOL
|
badlands | 4 |
|
|
Have to go with Nats tonight. They have momentum, home field, and I like the rightie/leftie matchup as Cuubs power numbers are slightly lower vs lefties. If it means Nats have a lead after three or four innings and try to hold it, so be it. It's their time to get over the hump. Line moved in Nationals favourite so public is on them as well and I have to agree. Two good teams, but I can't imagine Nationals lineup doesn't put some runs on the board tonight. I'm thinking 6-2 Washington. If it remains low scoring affair, advantage will be to the Cubs, I just don't feel that this is where it will be in a do or die matchup with so many proud hitters in the lineup. BOL all.
|
johnnyfry | 3 |
|
|
Just before gametime I got +255. Why such a difference? Maybe after Edwin was announced to be playing? I use an online site.
Anyways, was a great victory.
|
badlands | 9 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.