Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Big card days have typically been better for me...hope that trend holds
![]() |
Leapfrog | 13 |
|
![]() |
Let's add a few more totals
Adding: Minnesota/Iowa over 145 Indiana/Wisconsin over 135 Texas Tech/Kansas State under 128
|
Leapfrog | 13 |
|
![]() |
Adding:
Wichita St. -12 San Jose St. +20.5
|
Leapfrog | 13 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by LittleLouie: Since finding this site you are one of the few that I follow, but and You probably already r aware of this "CSU starters Anton Grady (10.4 points, 6.6 rebounds per game) and Charlie Lee (9.7 ppg, 3.5 assists per game) and key reserve Sebastian Douglas (8.3 ppg, 3.4 rpg) are all questionable with the flu, according to Vikings blogger Tom Mieskoski." Yep definitely aware, but glad you're bringing it up as it's a good discussion point. I believe the way they've been playing lately (and the way Youngstown St hasn't been playing lately) is great, and expect at least one or two of those guys to go. They will still have their top three scorers as well. But no doubt, there's risk there. However, even if they're not 100% as a team, I like em at -9.
|
Leapfrog | 13 |
|
![]() |
Adding:
Wisc-Milwaukee -7.5
|
Leapfrog | 13 |
|
![]() |
BOL, wish I had gotten Iowa at -2.5
![]() |
cjm2008 | 18 |
|
![]() |
Yesterday 1-1 Totals so far: Overall: 49-29-3 (62.3%) ATS: 41-26-2 (60.9%) O/U: 8-3-1 (70.8%) Today's picks: Cleveland St. -9 SDSU/SJSU Under 123 |
Leapfrog | 13 |
|
![]() |
As a math Ph.D. I find Kenpom's stats quite useful. I definitely don't let it be the end all be all of my picks, and I've developed my own models, but it's certainly a useful tool if you understand how to use it.
I find it much more useful especially for over/under predictions than point spread.
|
dustinpmipeo | 8 |
|
![]() |
Yep, these predictive tools are quite useful, and trend pretty well with actual realized game results. Cheong actually keeps tally of the predicte vs. realized margin of victory for several rating systems, and they all have a line of fit close to y = x (i.e. these methods predict margins pretty well) with a standard deviation around them of about 8 to 8.5, so there is room for noise.
Psychological factors, form, and injuries/suspensions might sway the movement of these predictions just a bit...but I don't see too much here to sway it away from the predicted values. People who say this should be a line of Syracuse by 6-7 should start consulting these ranking sources more. I've developed a few models that has Syracuse favored on average by 1.8 to 3.6, so it's a no play for me if betting against the spread. By the way, Sagarin himself says his "predictor" is better for predicting margins. Of his four ratings, I've validated this to be true as his best predictor by plotting his projected rankings against actual margins. So Syracuse is 87.83, Maryland 81.88. Add 3.13 to Maryland's score and subtract from Syracuse and you get a margin of victory of 2.82 for Syracuse.
|
Superfectakid | 9 |
|
![]() |
Today's picks:
E. Washington -6.5 Kansas/Oklahoma OVER 155
|
Leapfrog | 9 |
|
![]() |
Amen. I hear ya
![]() |
cjm2008 | 10 |
|
![]() |
Man, first week posting was amazing...second week was a disaster as I went 3-6 over the weekend. Still hitting over 60% so far though. But this is a new week! I'll post my plays later...got some homework to do on these games. Totals so far: Overall: 48-28-3 (62.7%) ATS: 41-25-2 (61.8%) O/U: 7-3-1 (68.2%) |
Leapfrog | 9 |
|
![]() |
Adding for tomorrow:
Creighton -13.5 I'll be out all day tomorrow, so making my one pick for tomorrow now. Like the Bluejays by about 17 here. Going big on this play. Today: 3-4 and waiting on the Hawaii outcome to see if I go 4-4 or 3-5
|
Leapfrog | 25 |
|
![]() |
Lookin good fear!
|
FearTheWeb | 91 |
|
![]() |
Yeah, I like GW to cover more than St. Louis, but I'm not playing it. Close to a play though.
|
Leapfrog | 25 |
|
![]() |
I can't see Alabama. Mizzou destroyed them by 21 last time in Missouri, and now Alabama is missing a starter who's 3rd on the team in scoring and 2nd in rebounding.
Just my 2 cents. BOL
![]() |
FearTheWeb | 91 |
|
![]() |
Got UCLA and Mizzou big plays
|
billythepollock | 4 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
James35 | 2 |
|
![]() |
Play the under regardless.
|
Pinkhuffy129 | 3 |
|
![]() |
Citadel failed. Rice is off to a terrible start. I guess there will be those days...
|
KineProfessor | 1966 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.