Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Farrell was awful. Not only did he turn the ball over, but he mirrored Princeton's tempo. Ahhh never bet on those sketchy Irish!!!!!
|
OCwager | 20 |
|
|
replied to
How long will they let you get away with getting the best in-game wagering numbers?
in College Basketball
Thanks for this responses everyone
Quote Originally Posted by Dsr_9: From what I have read/seen, they have a computer program that calculates the points per minute and aggregates it out in game. So if they are scoring at a 3.5 pt/min clip, it will compute that for in-game totals. This is interesting. I wonder, do they have a human watching every game that's being offered live or do they just let the program do it's thing w/ some games?
|
Learning | 8 |
|
|
replied to
How long will they let you get away with getting the best in-game wagering numbers?
in College Basketball
^^^to clarify, in my example i"m buying the under, in-game, at 158.5.^^
|
Learning | 8 |
|
|
created a topic
How long will they let you get away with getting the best in-game wagering numbers?
in College Basketball
So...let's say you make a habit out of getting the best possible number w/ in-game wagering. Is this something that will get you shut down w/ online books if you're putting a healthy size behind the bet? What about books in vegas, will-hill mobile etc?
EX: o/u 140, in-game o/u rises to 159 and you get 158.5. Basically, is making a habit out of getting numbers really far from the original line gonna get you in trouble? |
Learning | 8 |
|
|
Thanks for the info, looking forward to learning.
From what you've seen in the past, how do these teams try to move the ball on offense? Are they trying to get as many plays in as possible, or are they chewing clock huddling etc? Additionally, if a team is up by 2-3 TDs in the 4th quarter, do they keep playing hard and normal or do they try to get out of there?
|
alopez14325 | 7 |
|
|
This season I started with $800 and am now sitting with 24k after 5k withdrawn...98% of my bets came after the game started and about 70% was betting 1h unders. However, I netted a lot more in CFB and gave some back trying to use the same strategies in NFL games. Here are some things that helped me and what I learned to avoid:
-The trend is your friend, in CFB only: College, keep pounding the under as it's going down if that is the clear trend. NFL, you generally fade the action...buy over after punts, under after TDs etc because you get a lot of sucker trends. -Isolate teams with bad offenses, inept QBs and lack of athletes who win games by controlling the clock and LOS. B1G, I'm looking at you. Muschamp, I'm looking at you. If you find a situation where a team can really only score 7-14 pts (Washington vs Alabama), that's where you want to hit some in-game full game unders. Only 1 team will be scoring, and the other team will kill clock in the 2h. -On that note, look for situations where it makes sense for teams to chill in the 2nd half. Ex: bowl games where one team is ahead by a lot, teams trying to avoid injury, teams trying to avoid an embarrassing blowout. Try to find spots where offenses shrink the playbook and don't look to stretch the field. -Bad weather games in CFB, the weather is more impactful on the score than NFL. NFL QBs have rocket arms and can cut through the wind easier, while some of these poor college QBs just do not have enough arm strength to throw it downfield in a gale force Hurricane Matthew situation. On that note, use your eyes in those bad weather games. If the field is a swamp and no one can get their footing, it's a good time to hit the in-game under EVERY CHANCE you get. You'd be surprised to see how many times the books don't adjust their in-game spreads...for example in the ND-NC St game they were giving me normal o/u the entire first half while the field was a swamp w/ 30 mph winds. All of those Hurricane Matthew games in gale force winds, they didn't adjust the in-game o/u numbers. Amazed me. -The 2 min drill makes betting 1h unders VERY tough in the NFL unless you get it at a really good price. NFL coaches get so concerned about scoring and preventing a TD that clock management and D gets biased to the offensive side. I can't tell you how many times I got a bad price on a 1h under and seeing NFL teams score 10-14 pts in the final 2 minutes. They rarely just kill the clock with 1-2 min left in 1h like college teams do, because even the worst NFL QB can sling it down the field. -If you bet the under and see that the Run Ds suck, too much cushion for WRs etc, keep your loss to 1-2 bets. The goal is to hammer and hammer solid trends, while minimizing bets when it's clear your judgement was wrong and the Ds are soft. I'm wrong often, just with fewer bets. -Pick one or two days, and make a conscious effort to make ZERO bets to help build self-discipline. When I had good days I almost always gave a little back the next day getting my money in really thin situations. -For me it's easier to see disparities in CFB as opposed to NFL. NFL I gotta get too deep into match ups...CFB just watch the LOS for the most part and go with that trend. -DO NOT CHASE lines in NFL! That's the best way to give your money back on Sunday, lol. Teams are too professional and QBs are too good for massive trend betting. Good luck next season and manage your bankroll well!
|
Learning | 4 |
|
|
This one will probably be available for in-game wagers. I'd rather wait and look for opportunities w/ the o/u. 80 is a number that suggests there will be volatility w/ in-game o/u.
|
TheBlindDog | 10 |
|
|
Stanford. But I'm like, 0-97 when I bet on Mora's UCLA, so I may be a bit tilted.
|
ChickMagnut | 96 |
|
|
Thanks for the commentary. I was wondering why they didn't give #9 more carries...he looked like a size mismatch that FSU never took advantage of, and could have helped slowed the game down.
Defense just did not look well prepared. Though that seems to be the pattern when the QB is dual-threat :(
|
Billycool | 6 |
|
|
I like the under as well. I don't love how USCe is batting 1.000 on unders thus far, yet it's still 56.5. Seems like square city. But Kentucky's defense has been terrible so far, & this is a spot where they should give a more inspired effort while not being athletically overwhelmed. + Muschamp being so defensive minded on offense in multiple game situations.
|
Learning | 3 |
|
|
Anyone have a strong opinion on this one? Specifically interested in the o/u...
|
Learning | 3 |
|
|
I got a position in-game TOR 95 under. Shoulda added at 97...the pace is sooooo sloooow.
|
mellow_wolf | 8 |
|
|
Need to see Cavs D in the 2nd half before reaching that conclusion.
|
GreenBook | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by fitchris562: Up 2 G's this week and your post has me convinced to lay off OKC. Already won huge on OKC (my huge at least in game 4 ) They'll probably still roll but the rigged NBA is a fact and I don't need to get smacked in the face with this story book ending from the NBA. Thanks for the post! I'm in the same camp. Hammered OKC and hammered in-game GSW unders in 3 and 4. No need to force the action unless I see GSW quit, in game... |
TreyB1 | 24 |
|
|
No action for me, unless TOR begins to quit in the 2nd half. Then I'll hammer TOR's in-game under. No need to force the action tonight before the game starts. All four of these teams do a good job letting you know early in the game who wants it more... |
DukeBlueDevil89 | 9 |
|
|
These guys look disinterested
|
CaliPicks | 2 |
|
|
I overrated this QB. He's too slow in making his progressions when he throws the football, and he doesn't like to pull the trigger throwing it downfield. Great runner though.
Houston has some good athletes. They played well.
|
Grandtheftauto4 | 5 |
|
|
How do these teams play on offense? Specifically, do they play uptempo, slow and methodical, or somewhere in between?
|
AlligatorWax420 | 7 |
|
|
Primarily interested in sportsbooks that offer odds for thursday night and saturday games. Are there any located on the strip?
|
Learning | 3 |
|
|
I prefer the +2 as opposed to ML. While I see ARK winning comfortably, TTECH could have the psychological advantage if the razorbacks don't put it away, and game came down to the wire. Some teams have difficulties figuring out how to win close games, and ARK still needs to prove themselves on this front IMO.
|
jmyane | 67 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.