Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Has anyone else ever lost an in game bet when they lost a bet on what they thought they were betting against?
I know this sounds made up, but I am absolutely positive I placed an in game wager on 'under 69.5' after Crosby hit the 52 yard field goal. I know for a fact I did because I got +104 on it when the over was getting pounded. I'm just beside myself I KNOW WHAT I BET ON. Please tell me someone else has run into this problem before on bookmaker and give me reason why I should pull my funds out ASAP.
|
Mr_Totals | 2 |
|
|
Time for the most crooked conference in America to steal our hard earned money. Who has insight on the Toledo-Kent game? Toledo should stomp these guys right? Any MAC guys with some input? Any degenerate specials? |
Mr_Totals | 8 |
|
|
There hasn't been a first half goal since James Rodriguez amazing one touch volley on Saturday afternoon. That's 4 straight scoreless halves. Some game there will be that first half goal that opens the game up, why not tomorrow via the golden foot of Messi?
Over 1 -105 1H for me tomorrow. Cheers.
|
Mr_Totals | 3 |
|
|
I hate to be a downer but I really do think Tennessee takes Mercer behind the woodshed. If Duke was killing Mercer on the glass then this Vols team will do the same plus some. Defense and rebounds will be the difference here. Tennessee -7 big for me. Also lean UCLA... Thoughts? |
Mr_Totals | 8 |
|
|
NCCU WITH THE SHOCKER OF ROUND 1
|
Mr_Totals | 8 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Spangler:
Is there something wrong with your brain ? Quite possibly, yes. |
Mr_Totals | 6 |
|
|
WHO IS WITH ME???????? |
Mr_Totals | 6 |
|
|
Brutal way to lose a cover. Oh well, they made a good run at it in the second half when it looked like they may get blown out in the second half.
|
rynogeis | 13 |
|
|
Nobody?
|
Mr_Totals | 9 |
|
|
Love the UW/USC plays. Opposite side of Oregon. Good luck my man. |
VegasVandal | 32 |
|
|
This should be a fun tournament to follow. Interesting lines. Initial thoughts on UW/Utah for me is taking the points. Utah is a different team away from SLC, and UW to me has the wildcard that can win the game by himself in Wilcox. Romar knows how to rally his team as a dog in the pac tourney. I trust that he will keep this one close throughout and possibly win SU. UW +5.5 The 'SC/CU line is very interesting to me. At first glance, you can't help but want to take CU to destroy a team that won 2 games in the league. But consider this: CU would be playing Cal with a win, a team they just lost to in OT this past Saturday. Sounds like a lookahead scenario to me. Obviously they can't afford to lose this game in terms of making the tournament, but how can you not help but look past a team you've already beaten twice, both teams by 9+? The line seems fishy to me, give me 'SC to somehow cover this number. USC +8.5 Now this is an interesting number in the Civil War matchup. Both teams coming off emotional senior day home victories, especially UO. To me, UO has to be breathing a sigh of relief because that win essentially locks a bid up. Does this play against them in Vegas? OSU obviously fighting for their postseason lives. I'll take the points in a neutral court rivalry game. It just seems like the safer play to me. Beavs +6.5 And now onto the lone favorite i'll be playing in Stanford. Cougs coming off an out of nowhere blowout win over UCLA on senior day, that had to have seemed like their own super bowl. Stanford is the team to watch in this tournament IMO, they have the easiest road to the title game outside of Arizona IMO in WSU-ASU-UCLA. Cardinal -10.5
Thoughts on the games tomorrow? |
Mr_Totals | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by best_bets:
When you say Seattle is the better team, it may reflect on paper. Stats never won a game. Please remember he Seahawks play in the NFC You're right, and the NFC>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>AFC |
ac_bum | 57 |
|
|
What are forum are you reading? Every other thread is titled "Seattle is overrated" lmao moron.
|
Fademeuwin | 16 |
|
|
This thread is a joke. Can a mod close this down please?
|
choiOi | 32 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by cap10:
So how many teams with a Peyton caliber qb and weapons has Seattle faced? Oh I dunno, dude named Drew Brees. Twice. Combined 22 points given up. Or does that not count? |
Mr_Totals | 34 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by choiOi:
Manning avg 30pts against 5 of the top 10 defenses he has face this season. You figure out the rest. So which defenses were those? |
Mr_Totals | 34 |
|
|
Seriously, I'd love to know. Baltimore almost 5 months ago maybe (when they were playing their first real game minus Lewis/Reed)? Don't tell me San Diego or KC either. This is absolutely unequivocally the best defense the Broncos have faced. Give me Seattle ML please. |
Mr_Totals | 34 |
|
|
Pats get spotted 10 points (should have been 14), and they go the next 40+ minutes now into the 4th quarter with 3 points scored at home vs a solid but not great Jets defense. Unreal.
This has been an absolutely awful game to watch. I want my time and money back. |
Mr_Totals | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by CaptYossarian:
Serious question, brothers. Aren't we the PUBLIC? What exactly constitutes "The Public?" Every guy I've ever talked to both on the internet and at degen hangouts outside of the internet sphere thought of himself as a Sharp and the dude beside 'em as a Johnny Q Public imbecile.
The 'public' are the squares that will see this line and call it blasphemous because of all the hype they see on ESPN regarding Kapernick and SF. SF will be a big time square play amongst the average joes. |
Mr_Totals | 31 |
|
|
replied to
My wife just asked me, " Is this how are weekends are gonna go?? You on Covers all day....
in College Football Did you tell her to get used to it and to get dinner ready as well as look presentable for when games are over and you need to 'relax'? |
GoGoplata123 | 13 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.