mrweed13

Rookie

Posts: 657

Member Since: January 2009

Status: Offline

About me:

Signature:

Filter Posts by:

Entries	Thread Author	Posts	Activity
replied to 5 run chase starts monday in Systems & Strategies So I understand if anyone can help, if it's labeled a gm 1 play you play one unit, if game 2 you play whatever it takes to recoup the gm 1 loss plus 1 unit, game 3, etc.? Is that right? View Post \| View Thread	cisco	142	June 27, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to X'S FRIDAY MLB PLAYS in MLB Betting X I like the Sox over, but might be safer to take the Indians TT over if it's 4.5. They'll put up 6+ on Bucholz. View Post \| View Thread	xbaggypants	30	May 11, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Who do we like today? in MLB Betting Cleveland will put up 6+ runs on Buchholz. Easily. Play that however you'd like. View Post \| View Thread	LetsBeReal	14	May 11, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Tues 5/8 MLB Picks in MLB Betting Quote Originally Posted by sims_key: Mrweed...jokes on you bro. How is the joke on me? I'm only pointing out that you thought you were being a smartass, and in so doing you screwed up the math. I don't get my kicks from ripping guys who give free picks. Let alone guys who've done very well in the past and don't bother to stoop to childish dialogue themselves. Maybe next time you'll think twice about calling attention to yourself. View Post \| View Thread	target_9	47	May 09, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Tues 5/8 MLB Picks in MLB Betting Quote Originally Posted by GiLmo574: +33.80 - -68.87 = -35.07 He wasn't down 68.87...do a recount. View Post \| View Thread	target_9	47	May 09, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Tues 5/8 MLB Picks in MLB Betting Quote Originally Posted by sims_key: hmmm...interesting how your number before last thursday of Season(109-85-3 +33.80 units) added to your thursday session of -68.87 units somehow equals -24.27 ****might want to add it up again...you've been fudging it all year. And you might want to go back to 2nd grade math class before you make such an ass of yourself. View Post \| View Thread	target_9	47	May 08, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to X'S TUESDAY MLB PLAYS in MLB Betting X shoot me a text when you get a chance. View Post \| View Thread	xbaggypants	28	May 01, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Tues 5/1 MLB Picks in MLB Betting Quote Originally Posted by utfootball4: I understand boston bats are hot but how can you trust doubront? How can you post that question? He's easily their best pitcher this season. Read up a little. View Post \| View Thread	target_9	62	May 01, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Thurs 4/26 MLB Picks in MLB Betting Holy **** are we getting screwed today. Reds blew it and Miami is about to View Post \| View Thread	target_9	34	April 26, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Wed 4/25 MLB Picks in MLB Betting small card! good luck t9 View Post \| View Thread	target_9	41	April 25, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to will the florida line rise from +140 closer to gametime ?? in NHL Betting I see +145 here. I can't help but look at all the underdog wins and all the road wins in these playoffs and lay a bet down on the Panthers. They are up 3-2, home advantage is not all that meaningful, and they are playing with house money. Just can't look a gift horse in the mouth. View Post \| View Thread	IHIOUSE	7	April 24, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Bowman didn't do enough for Hawks down the stretch. in NHL Betting I'm not sure how anyone can watch the Hawks and not come away with at least three conclusions: 1) They are loaded up front. They have skill, speed, finish and grit. 2) Their goalie is awful. Period. 3) They play terrible defense in their own zone. They give up way too much space, their d-men (even the two big names) get caught out of position way too often, etc. It's a lousy team defense. Now I've always maintained that it's hard to judge a goalie when his team plays lousy defense, but I think Crawford and Emery let up enough softies to know they stink. But I also think Chicago would be making a mistake if they didn't question the coach in lieu of such awful team defense, as well as the roster of d-men. They've got some big names and some quality younger guys, but they don't play anywhere near to their potential. View Post \| View Thread	shimmersun	19	April 24, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Mon 4/23 MLB Picks in MLB Betting Target any thought to playing the Red Sox first 5 rather than full game? The bullpen is an abortion. View Post \| View Thread	target_9	45	April 23, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Name 8 goalies in the NHL better than Corey Schneider... in NHL Betting Quote Originally Posted by Exalted1: Luongo?? He will be looking for a job next season. He has been terrible since his time with the World Juniors where he shit the bed for Canada. With that contract I hope the Leafs do not get desperate and take him. I would take at least 15 to 20 goalies in this league before taking Luongo. Right, which is why he's not on my list. You apparently misread my post. View Post \| View Thread	rangerz2478	52	April 20, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Name 8 goalies in the NHL better than Corey Schneider... in NHL Betting In no particular order: Rinne Quick Henrik Thomas Miller Price Halak Fleury (yeah, he's been terrible this series but still). I think this is about where I'd slot Schneider, either above or one spot below Rask. And this Mike Smith stuff is absurd...if we know anything we know you can't judge a goalie based on one truly full season and only 4 playoff games. I mean why the hell isn't Luongo on this list? View Post \| View Thread	rangerz2478	52	April 20, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to X'S THURSDAY MLB PLAYS in MLB Betting GL my man View Post \| View Thread	xbaggypants	27	April 19, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to AT A LOSS FOR WORDS WITH THIS OFFICIATING in NHL Betting Quote Originally Posted by bhawksfan: Well I know the hawks are much better than the yotes, so I m hoping they can still turn this thing around... But I do agree with you, big money coming on the hawks + phoenix being NHL's team = recipe for disaster I won't argue you've gotten jobbed abit by the refs. I won't argue you have more talent than Phoenix, probably by a LOT. But Chicago is not a better "team" than Phoenix. Chicago's neutral and defensive zone defense is horrible, just horrible. The amount of space they give players in their zone is matched by few NHL teams, and their positioning and coverage is terrible. Worse yet, your goalie blows. These are two close to equal teams, and Phoenix has a huge edge in net. View Post \| View Thread	HookEmHorns22	42	April 18, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Good Value for Bruins to win east? (playoffs included) in NHL Betting The Bruins would most likely play the Pens in Round 2, which is obviously a bad matchup for anyone. 6:1 seems like fair odds to me. I'd have the Pens as favorites and then the Rangers, with the Bruins slightly behind them. If the B's are healthy and Thomas can get some rest they could easily be the team to beat, but right now Pitt just looks like they're running away. I'd be a lot more confident in your bet if the Bruins didn't line up to face Pitt in Round 2. You need more time for one of their key guys to get hurt, as they usually do. View Post \| View Thread	Bruins455	8	March 27, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to They got "THE CALL" From the Eye In The Sky In Anaheim in NHL Betting Quote Originally Posted by Polar_Bear: More hockey tonight let's put this debacle to rest... FWIW Polar Fraser didn't back the decision. He pointed out that the notion of having a back linesman be able to overrule the goal-line ref when their depth would be challenged was a bad idea. I think he's probably right. And of course, you are correct. The play was not "reviewable", but apparently it is one the team of officials confer on. I think they got the call wrong, personally. But I do like the idea of using all the officials on the ice whenever helpful, it just so happens it probably isn't helpful in this case. View Post \| View Thread	Polar_Bear	46	March 26, 2012 View Post \| View Thread
replied to They got "THE CALL" From the Eye In The Sky In Anaheim in NHL Betting Quote Originally Posted by mrweed13: So your theory is that Vegas likes the favorites to win? That's a new one. In my experience that's a good goal 99% of the time. But two things are getting mentioned here that are flat-out wrong. 1. It IS a "reviewable" goal. Toronto reviews every goal, and interference is an infraction they can call. 2. The rule book states the goalie can't be prevented from making a play on a puck in his crease. I think the problem here is whoever was in Toronto just assumed that any NHL-caliber goalie would have wanted to be further out in his crease, and thus the forward a full foot into the crease had stopped him. They simply gave Turco too much credit here, and it was a weird call. Actually read Kerry Fraser's explanation on TSN. That is obviously the better source on this topic. View Post \| View Thread	Polar_Bear	46	March 26, 2012 View Post \| View Thread

About Us

Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials

Betting Guides

Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming

Sports Betting

US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps

Contests

Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools

The Covers community has

618,670

lifetime members worldwide

Join our community today

Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.

Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.

mrweed13 Follow Follow Unfollow

mrweed13