Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
That was actually fkin disgusting, 3 outs to go, 6-2 lead top of the 9th and this slob comes in and does just enough damage to ruin my run line bet yet still hang on for the win. I hate when they bring in some fat face brotha with diamond earrings and chains everywhere when they're on the mound, those guys are always absolutely useless. |
Stryc9Nine | 5 |
|
![]() |
If you watched the last game and think it was OKC running out of gas i dunno what to say |
Erich777 | 5 |
|
![]() |
replied to
edmonton will lose tonite and win game 6..and in game 7 your stanley cup finals winner will be...
in NHL Betting Edmonton had to work super hard to get their 2 wins while Florida just blew them out twice. Oilers have not looked better than the Panthers overall and are allowing way too many goals to be a champion IMO. Panthers don't have any goalie issues they have one good one. |
Anthony7Flores | 23 |
|
![]() |
It's 2-0 the total is same as pregame |
GeoDawg | 10 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by vtec626:
Pacers offense was bad in the 4th started missing fts Turner and Nesmith throwing up bricks. Don't think Pacers will win another game after choking like that. I don't think so either it totally looked like they were gonna go up 3-1 and were tasting the championship, Thunder looked sluggish and no 3s falling. You have to hand it to OKC. It looked like another year of be the best and still come up short. Like the Bills of the NBA. They fought through that adversity and pulled it out. I think the momentum will carry back in OKC and they win the next 2. People act like the Thunder are bad on the road - they didn't cover on the road in playoffs because they were such big favs but were 32-8 SU in the reg season. The Wolves were dogs of only 3 at home compared to Indy. |
MDizzle23 | 43 |
|
![]() |
@gambling-devil Was about to post the same thing - degens only remember these things when they lose. Then it HAS to be rigged. Mathurin is a moron. Both those fouls were clear as day, they were trying so hard to get the inbounds they were fouling all over the place. Then the pressure got to him and he couldn't hit a FT. That's all it is. The nature of basketball allows for big comebacks. It's definitely gotten worse in recent seasons but it's always been a part of the game. I think that game means it's curtains for the Pacers now. They probably played their best game of the series, Thunder could not hit a 3 all game, they seemed really on top of things and it was such hard work for OKC to get a basket or a stop while the Pacers seemed to be in the flow and rhythm much more. I think OKC blows them out next time back at home and finishes them off in Indy now. |
MDizzle23 | 43 |
|
![]() |
I rarely bet hockey but i was bored and took a stab on the oilers... Now i remember why I don't bet hockey. 15 shots to 5 and you're losing. Goal shouldn't have counted then you get a penalty for challenging? What a stupid rule. Now you're down 2 goals even though the guy was in the goalie's lap for the first one makes no sense to me. That 4 on 3 power play was very uninspired and unimaginative too they barely got a shot on goal. This game is hopefully not continuing my trend in baseball of taking the team that scores first and then loses. Keeps happening to me but then i never get a comeback winner how is that possible |
PUSSYGALORE333 | 34 |
|
![]() |
So you're saying both teams will want to win game 1 of the stanley cup finals? Wow, amazing insight. |
FillyFlier16 | 7 |
|
![]() |
Honestly the Giants are worse, losing in extras two nights in a row after shutting the other team out for all 9 innings one night and the first 8 the 2nd night, and both times also having the tying run at 3rd in the 10th and can't get a hit. The commentators after the game said they are the worst in MLB in one run games, I remember last year or the year before the Cubs had that honor and it was a gold mine just wait for them to get into a tie game and bet the other team live they would almost never score. 2 run lead top of the 9th 2 outs and you can't finish the job. Disgusting. |
usikbasterd | 7 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:
No team who lost a game by 40+ points in the playoffs has ever won the NBA title. Those kind of stats only matter til someone breaks it and it's just a matter of time. The way the league is now there's lots of blowouts in the playoffs and the Thunder have blown out other teams way way more times than they've been blown out. That game was after they had won a 7 game series and faced a team way more rested, still beat them twice in a row, they were probably a bit gassed and took a breather, they only got a few days in between series and Minnesota had like a full week. I'm not gonna bother looking it up but I'd bet the OKC avg margin of victory this year is actually higher than any 90s Bulls team. If I had to bet one team every game on the spread it wouldn't be the Pacers. Last team that had an avg margin of victory this high was the Warriors when they won the title. Pacers will win max 2 games |
ActionMagnet | 29 |
|
![]() |
So you think fading the -500 favorite for the series in every game is gonna be profitable? Can I be your bookie please? Have you like not watched the Thunder at all this year? They've killed teams by double digits very frequently. They're the top seed in the much better conference and more rested. The east was so weak this year. |
ActionMagnet | 29 |
|
![]() |
What a stupid way to look at betting. There are no 'safe plays'. Only winners and losers. |
MDizzle23 | 10 |
|
![]() |
replied to
What the odds say: Would Thunder rather play Pacers or Knicks in the Finals?
in NBA Betting won't matter one iota, gentleman's sweep on the cards either way, Denver was their toughest opponent |
Macwestie1 | 16 |
|
![]() |
Dickridin like a MF |
richiepicks | 29 |
|
![]() |
How come they didn't do that last year when it was one sweep (ECF) and one 4-1? Did they just start liking money this season? 'Makes total sense now.' Yeah it's a wonder you're not a millionaire with that talent for hindsight. |
Okladood | 51 |
|
![]() |
Toughest game of the series so far for me. OKC was very good on the road in the regular season as a top seed usually is, so if they're 0-6 it could be looked at as they are due a win. Letting the Wolves tie it will make the series much tougher. Teams that get blown out usually play better next game. I think they relaxed off the 2 wins and will not do it again this game, hoping to potentially finish it at home next game. On the other hand I felt Wolves would respond last game because they are in the conf finals for the 2nd year they lost 3-1. I think like you said it will be much tighter this game and just wondering does that mean an over as they both score a bunch? Kinda leaning that way |
jdukes0004 | 19 |
|
![]() |
Every time some sucker makes a bad bet on this site they want to blame some other boogeyman. It's your own fault you keep capping off last game, the NBA playoffs have always been back and forth affairs that's why they play best of 7. In general teams down 0-2 coming home are a decent bet. You have to remember the Wolves were in the conf finals last season and OKC did have a 7 game series last time, it makes total sense they would relax a bit here up 2-0. |
StraightWagers | 33 |
|
![]() |
Were you born a fkin retard or did you have to work hard at it? |
SUREPICKS101 | 37 |
|
![]() |
better off making that donation elsewhere. It's not just that they lost both home games it's how they lost and how the Pacers are playing. The Pacers are stealing teams souls in the 4th quarter. Dropping 3 balls on their head and Halli obviously has the clutch gene which Brunson KAT and OG do not. KAT has to be the most overrated big man in the NBA. Atrocious on defense. And he looks like someone stuck his head on his neck crooked. |
MLdogs | 11 |
|
![]() |
Anyone who read all them stats and still bet the Nuggets - you know nothing about basketball |
NutinButtLove | 3 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.