Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
KC works at Buffalo Wild Wings. Made the call at half and told ASU to lay down |
KC_4_LIFE | 48 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Bettorific: Had them +2 with the under. Shit clock management. Had the ball tied up with 20 sec left and shoot, of course they miss and give up a bucket with 1 sec left for a push
Last one for the night 9pm Grambling +2.5 H1 -110/100 I'm not sure why they aren't favored both teams blow but unless i missed something Grambling wins H1 outright (and the game) |
Bettorific | 20 |
|
|
@steponaduck So if you liked them at -3, you should love them live at +12.5 |
Feenfromeugene | 37 |
|
|
Solid as always |
KasperNV | 15 |
|
|
So was it a mentally ill lefty or one of the thousands of terrorists the Dems let walk in through their wide open borders? Here in Vegas it looks like one tried to blow things up at the Trump tower with a rented cybertruck but Musk builds them so well it absorbed the explosion and only killed the driver. |
Mrgohard3 | 102 |
|
|
replied to
Where are all the idiots now that were saying the game was rigged for the falcons to win?
in NFL Betting I thought it was rigged for maximum entertainment value |
cd329 | 16 |
|
|
It's Wakko Flacco time tomorrow, he goes off to the power of 3, throws for 333, 3 tds, 3 picks and they win by 3 |
Jerseyshore88 | 30 |
|
|
Shits hilarious. Every drive, Ark 1st down run for -1, 2nd down incomplete pass, 3rd and 11, easy 35 yard pass. To quote Jay and Silent Bo, "They're fucking clownshoes" |
PUSSYGALORE333 | 25 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LoveCFB1_:
Let’s get this Texas Tech WahooTrain steam rolling down the tracks!!! |
WahooS | 92 |
|
|
Of course I grabbed them at +2.5 like fkin clockwork |
RUM151 | 16 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Docfergie: I think he put Charlottes TT by mistake.
I see Charleston TT over 76.5. I wonder why the big discrepancy |
RUM151 | 16 |
|
|
Cranky Hank would be a good wingman. He would jump on the ugly/fat girl grenades and save the pretty ones for you. |
Cranky_Hank | 35 |
|
|
Well if Wilson wasn't such a worthless piece of shiit and able to complete a pass that's not a pick six maybe they would have tried |
bigcash | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Ryoshiii: So you would rather throw away units paying juice to bet and then buy out of bets
Quote Originally Posted by miact: Why even post several PODs if you’re just going to change them the next day? Money change, line change, you don’t want your money sit idle while others variables move bro |
Ryoshiii | 118 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Fpsloo: How you figure that? Bowl games so far are 5 overs 3 unders 1st half. If you followed the system you would double up second half on the losers so you can profit .9 units. Of the 5 games that went over, 3 went under second half so 3 wins 1st half and 3 wins second half for +5.7 units. The 2 that went over both halves you lose 6.6 units on for a loss of .9 units so far, and that's assuming -110, which a lot of these games are -120. It had it's time, but it's time has passed. Let it go
@mak104 Check the system. Still doing pretty good
|
mak104 | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BrittanyWVU: You mean like in the last few days when you ruined your Christmas? Couldn't you have just posted in one of your other daily threads about everything being corrupt/rigged? Don't need to start a fresh one everyday
Tulane Florida 2h prime example. Vegas made sure it went over the 2h total because 92% at Caesar’s were on the under 2h. Just cost me $1800 haven’t been this mad in along time. Had the over 43.5 on 4 diff tickets and lose the under 2h chasing. Tulane coach needs shot |
BrittanyWVU | 46 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by leventis72: That was quick
Jacobs receiving of course Over 12.5 yards |
leventis72 | 27 |
|
|
Of course! I had Zags +5.5 |
Chiefthechief1 | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LB_Dirtbags: You forgot your tagline. GL tonight
1H Under 76.5 (small) Let’s talk about this… Both teams are offensively skilled. Scores for both teams have reach in the 80s several time. But saw the number and it screamed under for me at first glanced… did my dd, and here’s my reason… Iowa PG is a a pass first player. I think it will be very difficult for to execute a very one dimensional skill vs a very sound backcourt defense. Turnovers will be created and 4 other players will need to step in with dribbling and executing. Iowa State does leave plenty of space for players to shoot the 3, but I think they already know Iowa is all about the deep ball. Playing a tight outside perimeter defense is the goal and I think Cyclones can execute it pretty well. What worries me about the other side? State will score unwillingly. Didn’t take the full game total cause Iowa State does have tendencies to relax on defense. I think State will play a physical game early, noise will be a factor, and both teams could struggle offensively early. taking a small risk on the 1H under… RKLB to the moon |
LB_Dirtbags | 7 |
|
|
Both of these non scoring teams can eat a d!ck |
PUSSYGALORE333 | 20 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.