Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I have tons of, since no one is sharing.... |
orhane | 6 |
|
|||||||||||||
595-246 on the ML, i don't think it is really worth it to dial it down to the ML though. However there are some other determining factory using Away Favs in the NBA as a starting point. 148-97 for Away Favorites after a preivous Loss as a Fav L3 seasons. |
orhane | 4 |
|
|||||||||||||
Fade any Home Dog 4 Rules: Team A must be a Home Dog Team A will play following game at Home Team A and Team B should not be on a streak of 5 games of better (eliminate streaky teams) Team A and Team B should not be on 4 games or more on rest (eliminate rested teams) Fading these Dogs on ATS is 860-649 since 2014 season 490-310 L4 seasons |
orhane | 4 |
|
|||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by BlueStar57:
orhane, I'm a little confused. Is this how to determine the play?... Previous game: Team A favored over Team B This game: Team A playing at Team C Next game: Team A playing at Team D So... you're looking for a team playing on the road for at least 2 games, and that team had to have been the fav in their last game, regardless of whether it was home or away? true it does not matter if they were on the road or at home the last game. they must be b2b favs in an away game, next game is away too. nothing else. |
orhane | 6 |
|
|||||||||||||
https://sportsdatabase.com/nhl/query?output=default&sdql=p%3AF+and+AF+and+n%3AA+and+season&submit=++S+D+Q+L+%21++ you can see the results here. sadly it lost a bit of steam since i posted it, but esp for the NHL it has been a gold mine for me. as for other sports: MLB: https://sportsdatabase.com/mlb/query?output=default&su=1&ou=1&sdql=p%3AF+and+AF+and+n%3AA+and+season+%3E+2011&submit=++S+D+Q+L+%21++ works well here too. +43 units last season. NBA: mixed results in NBA. https://sportsdatabase.com/nba/query?output=default&sdql=p%3AF+and+AF+and+n%3AA+and+season&submit=++S+D+Q+L+%21++ NFL: does not work at all here. NCAAF: mixed results here too. NCAAB: does not work here. so in conclusion you can use it in ML sports like NHL and MLB. mainly because the effect of being on the road is overvalued by the bookies. |
orhane | 6 |
|
|||||||||||||
Play on Away Favs when they have been a Fav in the game before and their next game will be Away too. 150 Units Profit in 14 years only 1 loosing season. This year so far: 70-38 +20 Units If any others like to share their systems feel free to contribute. I have tons of them. |
orhane | 6 |
|
|||||||||||||
I have several working systems for different sports. Would be happy to swap. https://prntscr.com/r4vxak here is a screenshot. no chasing, no funky or illogical angles. |
mactac333 | 9 |
|
|||||||||||||
I have the combined data from 1995 up to date. Calculated the margins of total with Averages of Off and Def for both teams involved. Fading the system since 2015 got a net profit of 360 Units. If anyone is interested in the RAW data, feel free to message me. |
calinreddog | 300 |
|
|||||||||||||
https://killersports.com/nba/query?sdql=site%20streak%20%3C%3D%20-3%20and%20n%3Asite%20streak%20%3D%201%20and%20n2%3Asite%20streak%20%3D%202%20and%20n3%3Asite%20streak%20%3D%203&output=summary here is how you can identify the first game of the series. the first link identifies teams coming of a 3+ road trip and playing their first game at home: ATS record is 496-511. https://killersports.com/nba/query?sdql=p%3Asite+streak+%3C%3D+-3+and+site+streak+%3D+1+and+n%3Asite+streak+%3D+2+and+n2%3Asite+streak+%3D+3+and+p%3AATSL&submit=++S+D+Q+L+%21++ this provides the teams loosing that specific game on ATS in the first game of the chase and so on. i like to share this to show that chase systems are flawed once you can not provide winners on ATS as singles. this i not against you or your system, just want to point out the risks.
|
Grus | 89 |
|
|||||||||||||
ATS Winner Chase NBA: ats streak =4 --> 4 ATS Wins in a Row1st game Record:
ATS Looser Chase 1st game Record
so if my calculations are not wrong you are loosing estimated 7+ Units on a chase. this looks not very profitable on paper because the pushes may erase some of your wins.
|
sofaking1 | 2 |
|
|||||||||||||
As for the second system:
wish you good luck, but in my estimations, a chase system without value on singles, will not have much when you chase them.
|
cougarpines | 60 |
|
|||||||||||||
Hi If my calculations are right. The record for system 1 on the first game is:
And on the second game after a loss:
so you have a good "system" for the first game of the series, but second game looks not profitable on paper.
|
cougarpines | 60 |
|
|||||||||||||
Finished with 14-4 for the night and a profit of 13 Units.
|
orhane | 4 |
|
|||||||||||||
Looks like a 13-2 night so far. 4 plays up in the air in NCAAB. |
orhane | 4 |
|
|||||||||||||
Started 5 of 5 in College BB tonight.
If Wichita St. covers it will be 6 of 6 for 9 Units profit. |
orhane | 4 |
|
|||||||||||||
If you provide quality, work professional and people see you dedication, it will be successful not matter what others are saying. You'd have to build your reputation first.
It took me 6 months, but now I can say that my work is getting recognition.
|
FrankCris12 | 14 |
|
|||||||||||||
I have started my own business in January. It is a betting blog at blogabet: nash13.blogabet.com My bets are monitored by a third party. You subscribe monthly and your subscription will be paid out to me once you have reached profit over a month. If the subscription is in negative since the beginning, the money will be frozen and you will get either free picks till you are in green or you will get a refund.
I am a low stakes high volume player which means that there will be a lot of picks and the yield will be around 2-4%. I started as a free service in January 2015 and switched to paid service in March 2015. I had a rough season in MLB, but am doing very well in other sports. Here is my record up to 25th November 2015 CFL: 33-32-2 +7 Units (176 Units staked) NCAA Football: 253-211-14 +42 Units (865 Units staked) NFL: 72-94-4 -37 Units (319 Units staked) MLB: 1071-1027-97 -3 Units (4280 Units staked) NBA: 463-393-10 +97 Units (1740 Units staked) NCAA Basketball: 351-311-10 +41 Units (825 Units staked) NHL: 413-325-45 +265 Units (1815 Units staked) Overall: 2656-2393-182 +412 Units (10020 Units staked) 4.1% Yield overall. All picks verified by third party, all pre match at nash13.blogabet.com |
orhane | 4 |
|
|||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by Pandalicious: I'd be glad to discuss over PM. Sent you a friend's request. Thank you, accepted it. Will write you some insight after Thanksgiving. Have a good one.
|
Pandalicious | 158 |
|
|||||||||||||
Hi, as a statistician myself I am always interested in analytical data. I am doing well with Trend analysis so far. Maybe I can help you out with some information. I use sportsdatabase.com as a free db for keeping trends and team analysis in all major sports. If you like shoot me a pm.
|
Pandalicious | 158 |
|
|||||||||||||
Years of backtesting and analysis has shown me that if you can't win on single bets without chase you won't win on chasing either. Sep if you count in ROI.
|
Allison_Road | 679 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.