qzip

@Dconblus

 it did....and the thing is the prevent was sooooo unneccesary.  Rams o couldn't do anything.  Then they just stop bringing pressure and sit 20 yards back for a super easy td lol......but jake elliot is really what made it all possible.

@PUSSYGALORE333

 -400.  But free money is free money.  

Boom!!!  Rams +6.6 and eagles ML(in game).....from a likely loss to a double dip win.  Thanks Jake!!!

@nfl_brosuf

 nah I hate their chances.  Now that rams have ball, eagles d will stiffen up so I just played eagles ML to pick up some extra cash.  Douple dippin baby...

only chance for eagles betters now is a defensive td lol

@UnderdogKing

 it was- but thats way teams do it.  I knew when jake f'd up my rams +6.5 was cashing because I'm like "they're going soft on d and stopping pressure"....sure enough, Im cashing.  

@vtec626

 we need to sake jake elliot a gift basket lol.....I was super happy after the saquon td actually because I figured elliot would miss.  And then the eagles d would soften up intentionally and let the rams backdoor it.  Had scored stayed 22-15 no way the rams score and I lose.  

@nfl_brosuf

 way it goes  in this game.  I'm going to be up huge with rams +6.5 but don't deserve any of it.  It's not about 'deserve' in this game though

this is a case where eagles betters were *killed* by that last saquon td(and missed xp) because without the td they don't let the rams go down the field like that.  Just tragic for eagles betters who had -6. -6.5 or -7

I checked 5 different books and Allen was 58-59 at all, so Im wondering what price that is associated with

it is-  you can make good money reading this forum if you simply fade most of the consensus plays lol.....

bet is deader than dead lol......

deader than dead already

well  congrats....you managed to only lose 20k in imaginary money since you split the 2h plays

@Cooler999

 you were saying lol?

Dead then.....still dead now.

@gatornation

 well sure but what did -3 for the game(and pickem for the second half) cost?  I mean USA was a significant favorite coming in and ended the first half looking like the clearly better team.....it sure as hell wasn't a pickem at even money for the second half at my book.

so you're telling people to do in game live plays after the first qtr and take the team that gets off to a fast start/quick lead(and in doing so would be playing lines that are very disadvantageous relative to the opening line and highly juiced in a negative way)....umm yeah that always works out well as a strategy.

better yet why not just keep flipping back and forth with live plays taking whichever team just scored....nothing says 'sharp' like a series of alternating -240 plays :)

lol....USA backers are dead dead dead....could get ugly.  

lol S AL  (aka a lot of this board as usual) going to get absolutely destroyed tonight.....USA did not come to play, clearly doesn't give a damn, and has already committed two horrific personal fouls on defense.  If you have money in any way/shape/form on USA your bet is dead in the water lmao.....so funny.

@Knollywood100

 I'm very confused....the whole idea of hedging is to set it up where you are guaranteed to win money in the end either way(or at least not lose money).  If he plays Cle-4.5/+380(sounds a bit generous by the way even if his book will let him sell however many points he wants like that), then there is a *huge* gap of outcomes(anywhere from Denver winning by 5 to cleveland winning by 4....essentially any close game) where he loses both the original parlay and the hedge.  Thats like the opposite of a hedge lol.....