reg1979

@skn02

 I hope English is not your primary language. Your comprehension is woeful.

@yvesxiaoyu

A little research would show you that in back to back revenge situations revenge usually wins. You could also see that last month Indiana got crushed by the Celtics, then two days later beat the Celtics.

nm

@mikebdb

 "morons" - Your spelling and grammar say a lot about you, and it certainly isn't 'Hey, this person is intelligent'.

@mikebdb

 A. Gas prices are only down relative to the higher prices earlier under Biden; they're higher than under Trump. It doesn't matter to me, I think gas prices should be high. That's how you get conservation and better fuel economy and electric vehicles, not by government decree. I'd prefer higher gas prices due to an increase in the gas tax to fund road and ridge repair, not due to Biden inflating the currency and trying to limit American production, thus sending more money to Russia and Middle Eastern dictatorships.

B. Yes, it's usually not possible to reverse price increases due to inflation, the goal is to stop further increases

C. We're not going to only deport the criminal illegals, and even if we did and stopped the flood coming in that would be a huge ipprovement over Democrats' de facto open borders and treasonous refusal to enforce the laws on the books

D. Lots of Democrat voters got screwed under Biden, which is why virtually every demographic except mentally-ill 'trans' people and whiny little bitches saw a large shift towards Trump

Got any more trite lines you wanna parrot?

I don't post picks often, but when I do they are winners.

As for 'Bangtheboook', if they aren't deliberately giving bad picks, they must have no human involvement in what they post or in looking at the results of their 'model'. Because a human would look at a projection that differs from the line by 39 points and say 'That isn't right'.

@umgmu

I'm sure UK would do the same for a Democrat politician, too. But the Dems are too busy with Drag Queen Story Hour to go to a football or basketball game. Maybe they could get Joe Biden to show up if they told him there would be lots of young girls to sniff. As for Kamala, she will proceed unburdened by what has been, because the significance of the passage of time is that time passes.

I think those sites that offer their free picks and analysis must be trying to give bad picks. As in, they're fronts for the gambling sites pushing players to bad bets. At the very least, do you really think 'winnersandwhiners' has time to do a thorough analysis of 100+ games today? 'Bangthebook' picked whoever is playing VCU to not only cover but win outright. I said to myself 'Okay, that seems unlikely'. Then the next one I looked at was St Thomas vs North Dakota. This is what 'Bangthebook' says, "We have this one finishing with a projected score of 91-58 in favor of the Fighting Hawks. Not only will North Dakota pick up the win, but look for them to cover at +5.5." Really? You expect a 5.5 point dog to win by 33 points? Why haven't you mortgaged your house and gone to Vegas, because that looks like the biggest lock in history. Or do you routinely find lines off by 38 points, in which case why aren't you wealthy and retired? My streak survivor pick today is St Thomas, boldly going against the prediction they lose by 33...

Also, nothing personal, but some of the analysis provided by Covers' experts is headshakingly bad. I read one that said 'Team x beat team y last time out, expect the same here'. Sure, because that's how it works. Just look at the previous game and assume the same thing will happen again. Weird, because I have NBA teams in back-to-back revenge games at 13-7 ats this season...

@JUSTWINBABY61

 Oh. 

If he's been out for weeks, why would the team rally around him this week when they didn't last week? Or the week before?

I'm not an expert, but Saint Peter looks like a good play. That's way better advice than you'll get from so-called experts here and at other sites, who've offered some staggeringly bad takes and dumb plays. And I don't mean forum posters.

  Somalia is not an island. It's a  hole, but it's not an island.

Same with me. Like I need a reminder of what an awful loss that was by Minnesota after having a big lead at home in a revenge game against a team playing less than 23 hours after their previous game ended over a thousand miles away.

@travisandcat

 Can't you just count? Go to the leaderboard, count how many per page, find the last page with active contestants, and multiply.

Nearly 7,000 posts and a quick look shows them to be all parroting Democrat propaganda. thirdperson is a paid shill or a lifeless loser. If there was a mute function he'd be muted by everyone who is sane. I won't be replying to any more posts by somebody like that. Adios!

Don't take anything he posts seriously. Don't think any of his "facts" are true or dispositive. He's a parrot of standard Democrat talking points. He pushes the same narratives that CNN, MSNBC, ABC "News", CBS "News", NBC "News", The New York Times, NPR, Boston Globe, Washington Post, LA Times, Philadelphia Inquirer, virtually every actor/actress/entertainer push. And as Hillary Clinton has said, they think there should be "consequences" for not parroting what they tell you to parrot. I voted for Kerry and Obama. The Democratic Party has become a malignancy. Goodbye and good luck - you're gonna need it!

@thirdperson

 "Polls show most Americans favor strong gun control". Polls also show most Americans favor requiring Photo ID to vote. Polls also show most Americans favor mass deportation of illegal immigrants. 

@thirdperson

 In 2012 20% of convicted drug traffickers were illegal immigrants. At the time illegal immigrants were claimed by Democrats to number 10 million, which was about 3% of the US population.

@thirdperson

 Another Democrat who thinks you either parrot Democrat ideology or you must get all your information from FoxNews. Tv is for imbeciles. I don't watch FoxNews, sunshine.

The claim that "Since 2017, there has been 162 total homicides committed by immigrants in the US" is laughably absurd. Not just ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, which I am talking about and which Democrats ALWAYS switch to "immigrants" because they can never have an honest discussion. ALL IMMIGRANTS!!!!! Immigrants, legal and illegal, make up about 30% of the US population, yet you are dumb enough to think they commit less than 1% of the homicides????? I'm not going to do research to get latest info to try to convince someone as brain dead as you. This is from something I bookmarked years ago from Politifact, hardly a bastion of those oh-so-bad right-wingers:

"According to the fiscal year 2018 ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations report, the criminal records of people arrested by ICE for being illegally in the country included 2,028 homicide offenses (387 charges and 1,641 convictions). According to the fiscal year 2017 report, the criminal record of people arrested included 1,886 homicide offenses."

And the reason  "Illegal migrants are less likely to be incarcerated than people born in the US." is that A. They are harder to catch, because they are here illegally with unknown identities; B. They can easily leave the country to avoid capture; and C. they are often deported instead of incarcerated. So, umm, DUH. You should try reading outside the Democrat media bubble. A survey showed 46% of self-identified "liberals" think thousands of unarmed black men are killed by police each year. The actual number? About 15. The Democrat media bubble leaves people that staggeringly misinformed. Get out!

@wallstreetcappers

 "He has a right to say...". Where did I say he doesn't have a right to say whatever? I have a right to call him out. And you CLEARLY lack basic Reading Comprehension. I didn't "leave the topic and jump to immigration topics". I illustrated the fact that the assault weapons fixation by Democrats is the "disinformation" that they claim to be against, and that the reality is that assault weapons are used to kill exponentially fewer people than illegal immigrants kill. Yet Democrats and their Media Complex focus endlessly on assault weapons and ignore illegal immigrants. Tell me, genius, which should get more attention? The assault weapons that are used to kill around 100 people per year, or the illegal immigrants that kill several thousand and commit hundreds of thousands of other horrific crimes? Why are YOIU and "your side" so fixated on a type of gun that may kill 100 per year, but not on illegal immigrants that kill several thousand, rape tens of thousands, commit hundreds of thousands of other crimes? Why can't YOU and "your side" ever talk about illegal immigration without conflating it with legal immigration? Why can't YOU and "your side" engage in anything resembling good faith argument, instead choosing to denigrate with parroted phrases like "blame for all your woes"? Believe me, YOU and "your side" deserve every bit of the utter contempt I have for you.

@MrWhatsItToYa

@MrWhatsItToYa

 That was a completely irrational rant. You say that the Second Amendment only applies to people in a "well-regulated militia", then state that 'the Second Amendment can be changed just as others have been changed'. But according to you the Second Amendment only applies to people in a militia, so what's there to change?

If you either understood complex English sentences, or read someone besides a Democrat activist explaining the Second Amendment, you would know that what the Second Amendment means is 'Since a well-regulated militia is essential, every citizen has the right to keep and bear arms'. It does NOT say that only militia members have that right. It says that EVERY CITIZEN HAS THAT RIGHT, and the reason EVERY CITIZEN HAS THAT RIGHT is that a militia is important and the only way you can have a militia is if you have an armed citizenry, some of whom may join a militia. The ways to amend the Constitution are clearly spelled out. If Democrats want to change the Second Amendment they have to embark upon that process. They haven't. EVER. 

Also, it's quite noteworthy that Democrat media fixate on assault weapons, which are used to kill fewer than 100 people each year, while ignoring the 1,000 to 2,000 killed by illegal immigrants each year, and the hundreds of thousands (million+? I haven't checked data on that) raped or assaulted or robbed by illegal immigrants. Furthermore, there's no reason to think that, absent an assault weapon, a mass shooter would instead take a nap. The mass shooter would just use a different gun. Some of the most deadly mass shootings have been carried out with a handgun, including Virginia Tech.

 Your ensconcement in the Democrat media bubble has you thinking you are far more intelligent than you actually are. You should look up the Dunning Kruger Effect instead of being obnoxious here and probably elsewhere to anyone who doesn't parrot the trite lines you parrot.