Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Why does Covers have Dodgers last 10 listed as 8-2? |
Covers | 4 |
|
|
I find it hard to believe the Giants are going to be playing/risking many of their starters and the Redskins win and they're in. I don't like the 7.5 pt line but Skins will win this game. |
Covers | 5 |
|
|
This week I will be rooting for the Bucs. And on Nov 6 I will be a Saints fan. Whoever the niners are playing against...that's who I'm rooting for. As long as they've got that dbag CK as their QB. Congrats Niners...you've managed to get an entire nation to root against you. And that's my "Right" to hate CK and root against him. |
Covers | 8 |
|
|
That was embarassing Texas Tech. You just let a mid-level pac-12 team wipe the turf with you. |
Covers | 6 |
|
|
Cards should be -180 favorites here. The books are inexplicably STILL giving respect to the lowly Pirates. The Pirates will get swept for the 3rd series in a row. They're done...especially since Hurdle, for some crazy reason, still decides to put Locke on the bump. SMH |
Covers | 14 |
|
|
Must be the weather. People thinking a running team is going to beat a passing team in the rain. Sorry but BG is just too strong on offense and the better all around team. Take the spread, it's a xmas gift. |
Covers | 31 |
|
|
I was thinking of starting a website. Non-sports mind you. But after going to Covers I've decided against it. I mean with all the problems that covers has with locked pages, glitches, failed links, embedded video ads that hijack the page, etc. Everytime I come to Covers it seems that running a website is really, really hard.
|
seville1969 | 10 |
|
|
Who has Duke played? GT doesn't really have a look ahead game so they won't take Duke likely. GT will win but won't be surprised if Duke covers.
|
Covers | 14 |
|
|
Couldn't agree more with Ken. The embedded videos are locking up the pages, making it difficult to scroll the page and are just flat out annoying. Been happening way too often lately. When it happens I just shut the page down and stop using Covers.
|
KENB10 | 3 |
|
|
Don't know if it matters but Bryce Harper is scratched from today's lineup. Still think Nats win it but line might change.
|
Covers | 10 |
|
|
Toronto first 5
|
Covers | 5 |
|
|
Good thing Opening day was yesterday.
|
Covers | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by JoeyOhhh:
WOW!!! What do we have on this site, a bunch of old crabby granddads on Thanksgiving? Jesus H. Christ!!!! This is a fukking free site that updates all sports scores by the minute and is basically here for your pleasure...... I for one, like the new format. Lets you see the record, last 10, etc. without having to switch back and forth for one game. Too many spoiled, privileged, little spoon-fed, pussie crybabies still living with Mom on here if you ask me....... If all your using is the record and the last 10 to research and handicap games then that explains why you like the new format. You're an amateur and a square. More experienced bettors prefer data, simplicity and ease of use. Or maybe you just bet like a byatch and pick the team with your favorite colors or cutest mascot. New format is right up your alley noob. |
Mozart | 29 |
|
|
And how nice of them to change the format right in the middle of one of the busiest times for college basketball. You used to be able to navigate a huge slate of games in a reasonable amount of time. Now it's so large and messy that it's not even worth the time to do it. Would love to get an explanation for the change from a Covers-Team member. I could use a good laugh.
|
Mozart | 29 |
|
|
I agree with everybody else. New format sucks. Looks like they are trying to copy ESPN. We come to this sight for facts and data. I could care less what the teams mascot is. In other words, as my boss likes to say, KISS. That being said, I'd say there's a snowballs chance in hell of them changing it back. Some dbag who made the executive decision to change it will never admit to such a blatant error in judgement. Good thing there's other sites out there that do cater to handicappers and bettors and listen to what they want. Goodbye to covers for awhile.
|
Mozart | 29 |
|
|
Pittsburgh will be on this see-saw all season. Get an emotional win then lose a trap game. Tomlin can't seem to keep them focused. They'll most likely beat Jax in response to last weeks buttphuckup but my money is on the Browns the following week. Already licking my chops.
|
Covers | 26 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by District_101:
Tampa bounced back to beat Pitt after an embarrassing prime time loss... is that more unlikely than Brady bunch flipping a switch and winning at home? ...just saying. .... Feeling like the UNDER might be the play in this one. You're forgetting that Pitt was also coming off an emotional win in prime time and the TB game had some of the characteristics of a "trap game". Regardless of how bad NE wants to win Cincy will not treat this like a "trap game" and Cincy is NOT Pittsburgh. In fact Cincy has all the traits of a team chomping at the bit to get to the SB after losing in the playoffs. They remind me of a lot of the 80's SB teams. Cincy will be ready for this game and they can smell blood. This will be a statement win for this team against NE and on prime time. Cincy PK is a gift. |
Covers | 90 |
|
|
This is the first bad team that the Texans are gonna face and I feel like they are gonna take a whole lot of frustration out on the Rams. Texans -7.5. They will run up the score just to make a point.
|
Covers | 34 |
|
|
NE is super lucky to be 4-1 and they just don't have the weapons. Saints better on Off and Def. and they look like they are hitting a stride. NE still scrambling to come up with a run def. and haven't really played anybody of real quality. Saints take this one. Sorry Boston, gonna have to hope its a Red Sox year for you to get a winner in town. |
Covers | 47 |
|
|
Really don't know why Pitts is starting Morton in this spot. He's gotten shelled by the Cards this year. If it happens again Pitts could end up doing some damage to their pen too.
|
Covers | 4 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.