Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
@vanzack Have you looked into GB team Total Over, or GB +3 first Quarter considering they opted to take ball last week vs Dallas?
I estimate they have a 75% chance at starting on offense this week, so Over .5 (-135) 1st quarter points seems good. Have also taken +3 and considering SF Under 6.5 +135.
No guarantee Lafleur takes ball again, but we know SF will defer if they win toss. What's best way to bet this possible angle? |
vanzack | 175 |
|
|
Can anyone explain why Coinbase has approximately a $30 difference between their buy and sell prices? If I click the "Buy tab", the quoted price is $30 higher than what I can sell my Bitcoin for at the same time...I don't get it. I used Circle for two years, until they stopped trading in Bitcoin this summer. Circle seemed far superior to Coinbase. I haven't had any problems with converting to cash and getting deposits into bank account, but the overall functioning of the site is awful. Is there any legit reason for the different quotes? It seems like they clip you depending on whether you buy or sell. |
vanzack | 413 |
|
|
I have had nothing but good experiences with Nitrogen. On rare occasions, the payouts can take an hour+, but most of the time they are in your wallet within 10 minutes. They also offer reduced juice for football early in the week.
|
vanzack | 24 |
|
|
HRC 322-216
|
Mark_The_Narc | 29 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Mark_The_Narc: SW, do you really think the average hillary voter will refrain from voting for her based of impending investigations? Not a chance. Many of the people backing her ( college kids, blacks, the souls to the polls crowd) have nothing to lose anyway because they don't have anything of value to lose. These essential facts make the hill to climb for trump nearly impossible. Love to see what the average iq or wonderlic would be for trump vs. Clinton voter. Is this a joke? The dumbest white people in America are Trump supporters. They are the least educated amongst whites. They believe that a wealthy, narcissistic, egomaniac is fighting for the "working man." Want proof? Just scroll through the threads and notice the rambling, incoherent, illiterate posts made by Trump supporters. You are a funny guy.
|
scalabrine | 25 |
|
|
Colts have 1st down at Lions 10, with 1 min and clock running, down 6.
Inexplicably, Pagano takes a timeout. They complete a short pass inbounds, and
he ridiculously takes another timeout with 46 seconds. He is essentially saving
time for Detroit to get go ahead FG, AND saving all 3 TOs for Detroit.
Indy throws td pass on 3rd down, and takes a 1 point lead. However, Detroit
has 37 seconds and all 3 TOs, down 2.
Det got flagged for leaping on the extra point, so Indy gets to kickoff
from the 50. What does Pagano elect to do? Blast the kickoff into the stands,
giving Detroit decent starting field position at the 25, and running zero time
off on the return.
Why doesn’t he take advantage of the 15 yard penalty by kicking it very
high inside the 5, and pinning them deep? You can drill ball through end
zone from the 35—he gets nothing out of the 15 yard penalty.
Job of the coach is to maximize your team’s chances of victory, and
minimize opponent’s chances. Pagano did neither, and his decisions lost the game
for the Colts.
What is wrong with these coaches? They have no concept of strategy.
|
Snake30 | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow: Nice thoughtful thoughts. I'm always interested to see how words like 'liberal' and 'conservative' are defined. Very few politicians could be placed in either category across the board. Reagan is often viewed as a champion of conservatives, yet he heavily increased taxes, signed the bill that created complete socialism in the medical care field (EMTALA) and was actively a military interventionist (which creates a whole other issue...is military activism 'conservative' or 'liberal' in nature,' neither, or both)? And where does libertarianism fit in? Is hands-off gov't a conservative trait? Altruistic? Is it issue dependent? Great points. That's why I detest the "teams" the media tries to lump everyone into--Liberals vs Conservatives. They aren't even defined correctly, nor, as you said, clearly definable. Divide and conquer. Polarize the public into two camps and keep them fighting with one another so that they don't realize the major Parties are beholden to the same people. Keep insignificant things like kneeling during the Anthem, or happy marriage, in the forefront, while major issues that actually affect the public are hidden.
|
scalabrine | 110 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B: JFK wouldn't even be welcome in todays Democratic party... He'd be considered a right-winger... Jesus wouldn't be welcomed in the Republican Party--he'd be vilified as a liberal socialist. The height of hypocrisy is the fact that within the "Bible Belt", Jesus would get trounced in a Primary Election versus Donald Trump.
|
scalabrine | 110 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan: There is SOME truth to what you wrote regarding liberals of 100's of years ago. Although, comparing liberals from back then to liberals of today is terribly flawed. The reality is that they have very little in common when it comes to ideals and politics, not to mention it is a much different world in which we live. With that said, "Bernie and Jill Stein" were not the only lefties running for POTUS. HRC is also a lefty, just not nearly as bat sh!t crazy left as Bernie was. The Coughing Crusader has ventured further left solely to garner votes. She has pandered to the Bernie supporters, so she had to lean in their direction to gain their support. There are varying degrees of leftism. I don't believe that HRC is an ultra-leftist, but she is still left of moderate. Regardless if anyone is liberal or conservative, the only dangerous ones are those who veer to far to one side I wasn't really comparing
liberals from different centuries, as much as I was defending the word "liberal"
from the constant demonization it receives.
It is an unfair comparison
anyway. What was a radical idea centuries ago, seems commonplace today. What
seem radical today, may seem commonplace 200 years from now--that's how mankind
evolves. Some will be beneficial, and some changes may be
detrimental.
Those that fought for
abolition and women's suffrage were dangerous liberal radicals in their era.
Those that fight for free universal healthcare and college tuition(not even
unusual as many states had free tuition 40-50 years ago) are radicals today.
Opposition is always for the same reasons--greed and
insecurity.
I totally agree that HRC has
had to be forcefully pushed to the Left to appease Bernie supporters, but that
just means she's a politician, not a liberal. The entire scale moved so far to
the Right since the Reagan years, that people are called liberal that are right
of moderate.There are few, if any, Democrats that oppose war or dare to question
our outrageous spending on Defense. There are no Eugene McCarthys, or George
McGoverns running. The culture demands our candidates wrap themselves in the
flag, idolize and promote the military, and praise God,
In our culture, liberal has come to mean giving out
handouts to those that aren’t willing to help themselves. This riles up the
Republican base and appeals to their greed, leading to racism and division. Then
they use the code phrase that they are against “Big Government”, which is a
total myth. They are only against Big Government when it comes to helping poor
people. They love Big Government to prohibit gambling, criminalize certain
drugs, tell a woman what she can do with her own body, tell people who they can
marry, and step in to prevent a family from allowing a loved one in pain to die
gracefully. What is more intrusive to personal freedoms than
those?
Your final statement is also
true. I agree with many things true conservatives and true liberals say, but
disagree with most everything the Republican Party stands for, and do not
consider myself a Democrat for the reasons I stated previously. Ron Paul had
many great stances. I believe Gary Johnson and his running mate are thoughtful,
reasonable men, and I voted for Bernie Sanders. If you took all the candidates
running, Bernie and Gary Johnson were most closely aligned. That just
illustrates how we need more nuance, and more than two political parties. Two
men, supposedly with polar opposite political ideologies, have identical views
on about 75% of the issues.
I appreciate your well
thought out, civil response. |
scalabrine | 110 |
|
|
Kaine is more of a conservative than Trump--what are you two talking about? How is Hillary a "Lefty"? She has never met a war she didn't vote for. Put an "R" after Kaine's name, and you'd be telling us how great he is. You get caught up in this juvenile "us vs them mentality", and you can't even see the truth. The only "lefties" that were/are running, were Bernie and Jill Stein. And true liberals are the only reason any of you enjoy any freedoms, or rights of any kind. Go back a few hundred years and see who fought for every day people and workers to be treated equally under the law--think it was the conservative royalty? When Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, whose ideas were they modeled after? The Enlightenment philosophers were Liberals. Liberal is a positive word--look it up. Without them, you'd be farming a tiny plot of land inside of a moat.
|
scalabrine | 110 |
|
|
When do the official contest lines come out? Are they available on the SuperContest website?
|
rudy22 | 21 |
|
|
I guarantee our old friend Collegegambler LOVES Trump. I see him as the prototype for a Trump supporter.
|
scalabrine | 110 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: We did it guys, swept all our plays with a monster score ............................................. Game ..........ATS - won 12 units ML - won 14.54 units Totals - won 3 units WON --- 29.54 units on the game and 10.1 units 1st half = 39.64 units won Ill be back for the WNBA playoffs and week 1 NFL regression plays which we've have not finished with a losing record yet......................untill then guys best of luck............... Congrats on your big score tonight! You were spot on about the turnovers swinging back the other way. Also, AZ had at least 3 tipped passes find their own wrs for TDs in the previous 2 games. Meanwhile, Philly managed to advance, even though they played about as poorly as they could during first 2 rounds. It all evens out--ball bounces funny for everyone. 12 point dogs was a ridiculous line.
|
theclaw | 39 |
|
|
Have to take fat price with Soul+12.5 and a little +380 ML.
|
theclaw | 39 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by sundance: Trump pulls ever so slightly ahead of the woman who has gained 100 + pounds and has to be held up by Secret Service agents so she does not fall down. She is a joke. 3 lies in 1 sentence. Stop listening to Alex Jones.
|
vanzack | 1017 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: Honest question.... If she did drop out, for whatever reason.... Can Trump beat whoever the Dems put up? Bernie Sanders? Joe Biden? Can Trump beat anyone? Curious to hear who he could beat. I've been wondering the same thing--why are they so anxious for Hillary to drop out? She's the only candidate nearly as unpopular as Trump. Any substitute the Dems put up would likely win by a larger margin. Trump supporters only hope is that Hillary STAYS in the race. Also, to protect against any unforeseen circumstances, everyone should be betting "Democrats", not "Hillary".
|
vanzack | 1017 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: Dont forget about his feakishly tiny hands. That is a bit of a concern, but remember, those tiny hands can hit a golf ball 295 yards.
|
vanzack | 1017 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by sundance: Numbers are extremely high for a nominee who might have to drop out because of serious health issues. The Leftist media on an hourly basis refuses to tell the American public HRC's health issues. Thankfully, Sean Hannity is around to divulge the truth. His panel of
“doctors”, including one wearing a white lab coat to aid in credibility for the
discerning FOX viewer, was very convincing. Hillary is definitely suffering from
seizures.
I’m also worried about Mr. Trump though. The clip of him violently shaking
his head, and saying “ahh I don’t know what I said”, is very disturbing. The
media is covering up the fact that he suffers from serious seizures, or is an
epileptic.
Why has this story been covered up? |
vanzack | 1017 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Relax_Dude: The only gasp of the night for the Demos will be Pennsylvania. They are there everyday now. The mathematical probability of a Trump presidency depends on the results from this state. Penn borders W Virginia which is a double digit Trump win according to every poll. if penn stays blue, they don't give a rats azs about all the red that follows. praise be to Allah--they will be celebrating all over the muslim world. Like Trump himself, anything stated by one of his supporters requires
translating from a third party.
I have no idea what you are saying, but it does seem more subdued than your
posts earlier in this thread.
Maybe we can get Giuliani to explain what you really meant. |
vanzack | 1017 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by sundance: I don't believe the polls. They have to be off at least 10%. Huge, silent Trump vote. Truman/Dewey all over again. The best bet out there is Hillary will not be on the ticket. Interesting. The polls seemed very accurate during the Republican Primaries, and Trump cited them continuously at his rallies. Suddenly, they are inaccurate, and he doesn't mention them. "Remember, it's not a lie, if you believe it"--George Costanza
|
vanzack | 1017 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.