Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Have noticed you have been making selections outside of your so-called "zone"
|
Sentinel3 | 1194 |
|
|
Spare us quoting stats that have no validity. Only stats that have validity are that which are posted here.
Nobody with a reasonable brain thinks you are actually betting this. How much is a unit for you?
|
Sentinel3 | 1194 |
|
|
You're still not understanding math again. No matter how many wagers people wait, the odds based on your lines are going to be 66% wins per wager. The odds don't change just because you have lost 2-3 or whatever in a row. Your logic is some of the worst betting logic. The same logic losing bettors use with roulette ... "look Mike red has come up 10 times in a row, no way it can lose again"....and then it loses 5 more times in a row.
How much is a unit for you?
|
Sentinel3 | 1194 |
|
|
The problem is this system is not mathematically practical. In order to utilize a system like this you would need a sizable bankroll at multiple shops. Good luck getting major action on ITF challenger events at one book...especially if you are a winning bettor. With bitcoin it's easier to move money between books but it still requires time and organization.
Also, $25 a unit and a $25,000 bankroll is about the highest you could go without having serious limit issues on chases. If $100 was used you would see major issues if 5 or 6 were lost in a row. I suspect the book would catch on fast to the strategy and the next time you lost 5 or 6 in a row they would cut your limits down to nothing. Also reading the conversation the OP clearly doesn't understand math. Math doesn't have a memory... you could possibly lose 20 in a row. If you want the odds at 1.50 just go 3x3x3 and multiply another 3 for each in a row to get the actual odds. Certainly the odds of losing 6-7 or more in a row are slim. But it can and will happen most likely at some point. Also each time a win occurs the OP is only recovering half of that wagered. Meaning: If they lose 3-6-12-24 units and then win the 48 unit chase they are only recovering the units lost on the previous wager and would still be down 21 units on that streak. This is why the OP is even or a little down despite large win streaks. Can this system be utilized and be profitable? yes Can the average Covers poster use this system? no |
Sentinel3 | 1194 |
|
|
This is one of the more misleading threads in Covers history. You claim to be a great capper but your average line is -200. This means you have to win 2 for every loss to just be even. Your record is 122-60 So in reality you are 1 game above normal. Also despite these great win streaks you are still down units. Essentially you are touting a house of cards. Good luck
|
Sentinel3 | 1194 |
|
|
Am sorry but this whole thread was a ploy that went bad. Are a bunch of things that don't add up with all of this.
Amazing that a guy in Vegas would never do a video someplace that was interesting... every video was in his house or car. Anyone can do that and claim to be someplace. Very weird Are a couple usernames that defend him no matter what. Goose comes across as either an investor in this shitshow or a close family member. Also, Goose seems preoccupied with this being in website promotions and had to negotiate a new place for this. Am sorry but if this was legit you wouldn't care where it was at. You care where it's at when you are looking for hits. Am sorry folks but I have been on this site since around 2000 and have seen a ton of ploys through the years. This was a creative ploy but the kid couldn't pick his nose with 10 fingers. This lie is on the same level as the SaraJphillips debacle...sad stuff
|
collegegambler | 14200 |
|
|
Novak could win the Grand Slam next year and make the argument moot
|
CountCrisco | 18 |
|
|
How about including insight on the selections?
|
EaglesPhan36 | 272 |
|
|
Make sure you F5 your thread some more
|
LICappers | 574 |
|
|
Hope this username works out for you
|
LICappers | 574 |
|
|
How does past posting help anyone on here?
You are on here daily telling us about the live wagers you win ...even though they aren't posted. You are 100% an alias... I hope you get some customers soon as your stick is old.
|
LICappers | 574 |
|
|
Same can be said of the PGA ...but would you rather win the Masters or the PGA?
Historically, many of the top players didn't play in the AO. To compare it on the same level as the others is just not realistic. The players might enjoy the tournament and love the environment there...but lets call a spade a spade...they would rather win any of the other titles before the AO
|
rzagza | 42 |
|
|
Hope you get your customers soon
|
LICappers | 574 |
|
|
You confuse fun and entertaining with prestige. The AO is the most fun major of the group. The fans and atmosphere are great. But when we talk about history and prestige it is 4th...just like the PGA.
Please feel free to link the reports of players saying it is their 2nd most important major...not fun or favorite ...but most important title to attain
|
rzagza | 42 |
|
|
https://www.totalsportek.com/money/highest-prize-money-in-tennis-grand-slams/
|
rzagza | 42 |
|
|
Unless you're Australian ... the AO is the least attractive title by name It is the tennis version of the PGA Championship
|
rzagza | 42 |
|
|
Have been playing for break every time the server serves in the sun. Has been great thus far. Keep an eye on the trend going forward in the match
|
sparty444 | 1 |
|
|
Hope this username works out for you
|
LICappers | 574 |
|
|
Hard ask for Young since he has played two 5 set matches and a 4. Wawa hasn't been excellent but still hasn't dropped a set. Better bet in my opinion would be Young 1st set. Can't see him making another comeback here.
Your logic on Anderson makes more sense on the +2.5 sets side? Same logic could be used for Isner as well?
|
PapaShango | 63 |
|
|
Apparently Bet365 does when the result is determined... that is a very very rare circumstance. So I apologize.
But you are both clearly aliases ...hope these usernames workout better for you
|
InvestSport | 82 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.