Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
BAL -3.5 NE -9.5 NYJ +3.5 ARZ +10 KC +3.5 |
Spectre01 | 21 |
|
|
Looks like the Steelers are going to break the streak. At least Baltimore held up their end of the streak.
|
Spectre01 | 21 |
|
|
This week's picks are BAL -4.5 and NYG -3.5. The system says that Baltimore should only win by 3 but because the system has never been right for this team the pick will be Baltimore. The system says that the Giants should only win by 2 points against the Steelers but the Giants are favored by -3.5. We have to go against the system once again and say that the Giants will win and cover. |
Spectre01 | 21 |
|
|
Last night the system was right and picked TB to win ATS. Both TB and MIN had 3 system wins a piece going into last night's game so the trend with those teams continues to be strong with system wins.
|
Spectre01 | 21 |
|
|
Everyone that provided me an e-mail address just received the spreadsheets. I have a few messages from people that have not provided an e-mail address and I have added you all as friends so that I can reply to your messages. If you want the spreadsheets please pm me your e-mail address and I will send them.
|
Spectre01 | 21 |
|
|
Hi Guys, Sorry it has taken so long to get back to everyone. Work has been hectic and I've been pressed for time. The spreadsheets for this week are finished and I will be e-mailing them to the people who inboxed me shortly. The pick of the week will be PIT -5.5. The system says that Pittsburgh should win by only 2 points and has been wrong on games involving Pittsburgh every single week this season. |
Spectre01 | 21 |
|
|
If anyone wants a copy of the spreadsheet please feel free to inbox me your e-mail address and I'll send it to you.
|
Spectre01 | 21 |
|
|
New England decided to ruin the 0 wins streak this week but the other 2 came through. So the remaining teams with 0 system wins so far this season are Pittsburgh and Baltimore. The Jaguars moved up to 4 system wins tied with the Broncos at the top of the system wins list. If you bet with the system this week you would have lost your bankroll. There were only 3 wins that the system predicted correctly. So as it stands so far this season... DEN, JAK: 4 system wins HOU, KC, MIA, MIN, NWO, SD, SF, TB, TEN: 3 system wins ATL, CAR, CHI, DAL, DET, GB, IND, NYJ, OAK, PHI, SEA, WAS: 2 system wins ARZ, BUF, CIN, CLE, NE, NYG, STL: 1 system win BAL, PIT: 0 system wins |
Spectre01 | 21 |
|
|
The Picks this week will be: HOU -6.5 NE -10.5 PIT -3.0 Let's see what happens |
Spectre01 | 21 |
|
|
The most interesting statistic to me were the teams that the system has never been right on. Would that trend continue in week 6??? YES!!! It DID!!! The other interesting part about it was PIT was facing TEN this week and TEN had 3 system wins. The big goose egg held up against a team that has been consistantly winning with the system. The system did however pick a winner with the STL MIA game but it was only by half a point. so BAL, NE and PIT are all still a big 0 system wins.
|
Spectre01 | 21 |
|
|
DEN, HOU, JAK, MIN, NWO, TEN all have 3 system wins predicting ATS.
ATL, CAR, CHI, DAL, GB, IND, KC, MIA, SD, SF, TB, WAS all have 2 system wins predicting ATS.
ARZ, BUF, CIN, CLE, DET, NYG, NYJ, OAK, PHI, SEA all have 1 system win predicting ATS.
BAL, NE, PIT, STL all have 0 system wins predicting ATS.
|
Spectre01 | 21 |
|
|
I was just about to give up on this system and then I decided to look at it from a different angle. I decided that from week 2 to week 5 I was going to look at the games where the system predicted a winner ATS and see what teams were involved in a system win ATS. Up to week 5 the teams that were involved in system wins looked like this: |
Spectre01 | 21 |
|
|
I have been using this system since 2009 and it wasn't until this year that I decided to put my own spin on it and there have been some interesting results. I usually don't start using this system until about week 7 because it entails plugging in the points for and points against for the first 6 games of the season for each team playing that week. After that you calculate the average points for and average points against for the teams that are facing each other that particular week. You also remove the highest points for and lowest points for and highest points against and lowest points against for the teams facing each other. You would then add the average points for, for the visiting team to the average points against for the home team and subtract 20.5 from that number. This gives you the projected points that the visiting team is going to score. You do the same thing with the home team (add the average points for, for the H team to the average points against for the V team and subtract 20.5). This will give you the projected final score of the game. Since there hasn't been 6 games played yet this year I have been skipping the part where you eliminate the highest and lowest points for and highest and lowest points against for each team facing each other and have just used all points for and points against. The system has not worked well at all so far this year with a record since week 2 of 30-44 but it has predicted some pretty good upsets. The problem is the inconsistancy and not knowing when it will actually work for the team that may or may not come through with one of these upsets. I have to restart the computer I'm on right now so I'll be back to tell you the rest of this system story in a moment. |
Spectre01 | 21 |
|
|
These are the picks I have going on for tonight! 5-TEAM PARLAY |
Spectre01 | 3 |
|
|
I got killed on my point spread as well...went 3-5 on the day. BOL to you this evening!
|
Macwestie1 | 26 |
|
|
BOL to you today!! I'm still deciding on my Point Spread Ticket...How much do you put down on a point spread ticket and how many games on one ticket do you play? Just curious!
|
Macwestie1 | 26 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by wjeremy97:
what sorta stuff are you investing in spectre? I think every1 needs a policy of some sort because you don't know when shit is going to hit the fan and you don't want your family to suffer because your ill, disabled or premature death. and yes i am a life insurance agent, but i've seen family and friends suffer and it's not very fun to go through this. ...actually quite sad I'm in training right now to be a life insurance agent. I just passed my L.L.Q.P. exam and I'm going to write the provincial exam in about 3 weeks. After that I'm going to get my mutual funds license. I'm learning so much about this business right now and I'm pretty stoked about starting to help people prepare for their future. |
searchwarrant | 24 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by pjrez:
To play devils advocate, if you still want to carry insurance after that 20 or 30 year time frame is up, you may be out of luck if your health changes. You may still have a mortgage to protect, wife, grandkids? Who knows what may go on in that 20 years. I wouldn't rule out some form of permanent coverage. That's what the investments are for. Now, when I'm young, I need all of this coverage to take care of loss. With the investments and money strategies that I'm implementing now I'll be self insured by the time the 20 years is up and won't need a policy hence avoiding higher premiums and shorter allowable terms. |
searchwarrant | 24 |
|
|
I usually don't post here but I wanted to tell you guys that you are making the smartest moves by getting term insurance. I have a 20yr term policy and I invest the difference of what it would have cost me to get a whole life policy. I bypass the low return of 4% that the banks would give me and will most likely end up with a 10-12% return on my money. The rule of 72 says to divide the interest rate you expect to get into 72 and that's how many years it will take for your money to double each time. With a 10-12% return my money will double every 6 years. |
searchwarrant | 24 |
|
|
8-2 on the week, I almost hit the 10 gamer...so close...I'll post my next 10 gamer tomorrow! Hope everyone had a profitable week!
|
Spectre01 | 2 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.