Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sir, please do not let your record deter you on your quest to discover losing sides in mlb competition.
Your record speaks for itself and please go on on your godly guest.
|
KeyElement | 26 |
|
|
that's probably a good game to stay away from and just enjoy the spectacle.
good luck) |
cjm2008 | 15 |
|
|
Brilliant call. Congrats!!
|
KeyElement | 33 |
|
|
that was not the box, but the c word that u r, just as u r csmocker
|
KeyElement | 32 |
|
|
hey, you dumb box, FU
|
KeyElement | 32 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement: Forgot one laugher there. I believe that is your first 5 Star Laugher this season. this is a rather unusual/unexpected from someone who's having the day you're having now. you must be either filthy rich or in a state of enlightenment beyond most of us, degenerates.. or playing with monopoly money.
|
KeyElement | 43 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement: //// Now I can sit back and await the usual. Too much juice! Too many road
teams! Yer nuts! Yer stupid! BOL well, let the numbers speak for themselves. your understanding/interpretation of probability, as stated here, though, does indicate a flaw in your decision making process.
|
KeyElement | 43 |
|
|
mets are probably not in the good spot, with no days off since apr 28 (I believe) and series with washington coming up.
|
KeyElement | 30 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement: Yes, I am aware Gordon has been suspended and that does not effect the play. but the fact that miami arrived in Milwaukee around 0500, about 12 hours before kick-off, after being on the west coast for several days certainly should.
|
KeyElement | 23 |
|
|
after watching 2 innings is looks like gray has difficulties controlling his pitches.
hard to get ahead in this business.
|
cjm2008 | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by phixer: wow, one single post and already a record of 10-4-1. not bad. that's probably because he's too modest to mention 100 - 0 season he had last year across several sports. it's been a rough (but expected after such a great start) week in the nfl. people, pls, just look at Phixer's record to decide if he is any good (in this biz there are many princes but no one is the king) and treat his stories as a source of amusement. No reason to get personal and pollute the thread.
|
phixer | 462 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by phixer: 1-2-1 on that strangest of the games lately "strange" is probably an understatement in this case. so far we've have had starting QBs getting injured/underperforming, teams imploding and books loosing money two out of three weeks. all prime time games have been disappointing so far and this week does not look like breaking this trend. I wonder if all the latest attempts on gambling legalization changed some kind of implicit existing balance of interest between the league and "vegas" and the former decided to show the latter who is the boss. |
phixer | 462 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Rip100: line move games such as this maybe are fades going forward I don't think we'll ever know what caused line fluctuation in this particular case, much less learn anything that could be profitably exploited going forward. there is a constant struggle between books and people with enough financial-computational-informational resources, we'll always be a step behind (lucky in streaks and losing long term). |
phixer | 713 |
|
|
while I most certainly do not subscribe to the "NFL owes..." theory, money and line movement seem to agree with Phixer's conclusions (picks).
and bookies were complaining on espn about their loses on late games yesterday (on top of bloodbath in W1). in this biz money probably the only thing that does not lie (too often). good luck, Phixer and everybody. |
phixer | 713 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by phixer: i didn't have a losing season last year. i had a losing season in nfl for the first time which was well made back with nba. i was never ever down 100 units (). i dont care you follow or not and i also dont care being admired or not - but when you touch my records - either get your facts right or just no, I'm neither following no giving advise, when it comes to money. also, I do not maintain any records for anyone who posts here or follow your posts (or picks) in any other sport. you may as well made money in nfl last year for the whole season - what I do remember well is that your record in nfl since december was rather poor. I do remember some very desperate 10-20 units plays that were nowhere close to paying. in any case, just a fare warning for all of those who'll lose money they cannot afford to while chasing something that does not exist good luck anyway
|
phixer | 713 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vinnievibes: i think we have a cult started here...god, you people are sickening greed will always be part of human nature. phixer has been on a good streak so far and that always brings cheer-leading imbeciles in droves. what they seem to ignore (or forget) that: 1. phixer went through very rough patch to end last season (if memory serves me right, he was down well over 100 units in the last couple of months). 2. there is inverse correlation between performance of books (as per espn) and phixers record so far even though he thinks that he is "on the side of the books" 3. no one ever got rich while following another man's advice. Luck is bound to turn, so let's enjoy the ride while it lasts -)) |
phixer | 713 |
|
|
under was a good (if such word applies in sports market) play.
money movement/split is most reliable indicator of the "right" side, barring insider knowledge. it is not possible to win every bet. those "champions" who manage to win "super contests" are no better than mexiacan janitors winning super lottos'
|
phixer | 483 |
|
|
84% of spread money as well as 74% of ML money is on San Francisco, and yet the line goes from -170 to -130.
this is a classical case of "reverse line". the move here either no bet or the bet on the dog. at least wait until game time, see if the reason for such line move becomes known, and then make decision. |
jm894 | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by phixer: .... now - please remember that every "expert" that charges you money for his picks is a cheat. because, otherwise he wouldn't need your money for his picks because he's be making money on his own picks if they'd be winners. like i do. .... don't get fooled by freely available information about the percentages and the quantities of the bettors on sides, spreads and totals. ..... don't get fooled by a consensus info available for free. i know what im talking about because for a true info you gotta pay a lots of money and be a member - like myself. i get the right info - always and i pay for it. i am willing to pay for it because it is helpful in determining the outcome by analyzing the big money moves. and finally - don't fool yourself you can catch vegas off guard. won't happen. you better join vegas than fight them. being on the winning side in a stable fashion means being on vegas side ... just a few quick (I hope) notes. 1. this biz is all about money, not percentages of correct pick. So, there are two distinct activities: picking (handicapping) and trading (actually determining bet size, hedges, exit points, etc.) there are people who are doing very well (about 60-65 percent) when it comes to determining winning sides, even ATS, but they still manage to lose money because they cannot deal with emotions involved in dealing with money. someone who can would be better off paying for picks with proven record (one only needs to establish consistency in generating long streaks, either way for a semi competent trader to make money) 2. all publicly available info does have its value. One only needs to identify meta data trends to come up with profitable strategy. Unless you have doctors/lawyers/team insiders on your payroll, whatever you're paying for is not better than whatever is available on the inet. 3. the mechanics of vegas price generation process are becoming more and more available. it is far from optimal - not may people have mental discipline to take advantage of it, but it is another story. anyway, good luck to all. PS: that bears "over 50" seems to be wrong to me (just my opinion, but after doing dozen of years in chicago i think i know the bears somewhat.)
|
phixer | 433 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by tuco: I see H. Santiago being listed as a starting pitcher for the Angels. Was it a typo? never mind - it was an error on betfair. seems to be fixed now, shoemaker it is. good luck to all
|
indiansrock | 13 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.