Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Someone on Twitter asked me about if recent results are attributable to variance or something wrong with what I am doing. This is my answer - it has a lot to do with what people post in my threads here also....
Things change in the NFL. Year to year, week to week. The one change I am most vulnerable to is favorites covering without statistics to back it up. That is happening a lot this year, and even with adjustments - I cant overdo it. This is the most outlier season in the last 10 with regards to that specific situation. So either the NFL has fundamentally changed and the predictors of the last several years are somewhat worthless, or we have had 9 weeks of outlier data and or results. Impossible to tell. Only time will tell. When statistical predictors become less reliable, the market is more random by definition. I do not like risking money on randomness. So my eyes are open. Fortunately, the amount I am down so far is overcomable and not extreme - but I look more at what is causing it that is giving me stomach pains. My backtesting is showing no way for me to win in some weeks. That has never really happened. This is due to randomness. If I want to bet randomness, I will just go to a casino. If you cant have predictors, you cant have success year on year. My set of predictors have proven to be close to worthless this season. Will that continue? That is the only answer to your question. Its not so much that favs are winning (they are). That would be bad, but not terminal. What is terminal is that favs win without the backup of the predictors also. That is terminal. |
vanzack | 99 |
|
|
No bet tonight Chiefs / Bucs GL all
|
vanzack | 99 |
|
|
In a sea of boneheaded coaching decisions.... One was my favorite today. A fireable offense IMO. Brian Daboll and the Giants.... Giants down by 5, Commanders have the ball, Giants have 3 TO's. On first down at their own 30, the commanders are tackled in bounds with 2:43 on the clock. The Giants decide to not call a TO, and let the clock bleed. The problem is that there will be 2:03 when the Commanders have to snap 2nd down - which means they can throw the ball with no risk because the 2 minute warning will happen either way. Kliff Kingsbury realizes this - Daboll stands there like the bridge troll that he is. Commanders snap at 2:04, throw 30 yards downfield to a wide open guy - game over. If you find yourself on defense needing the ball back, you cannot allow the other team to snap the ball between 2:05 and 2:01 ever. Golden rule. Because then you need to defend the pass and run. Carry on. |
vanzack | 99 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
Almost, hold fast. This season will take years off of my life. I still hold to the process. I try to make smart changes, but I haven't gotten traction the whole season. Not going anywhere. Still time to have a successful season. |
vanzack | 99 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by brn2loslive2win:
@vanzack No play tonight VZ? No play tonight. |
vanzack | 99 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TheBoyWonder:
This OP sounds cringy. Get over yourself. And the fanboys are hilarious. OK, boy wonder. |
vanzack | 99 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Enfuego9:
Why does vanzack get so much attention? You used to all the attention? |
vanzack | 99 |
|
|
If you aren't on 4casters.... Cavemen looking up at the stars. I am trading faster than Jordan Belfort after an 8ball. |
vanzack | 99 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues:
Winners talk about the present and take ownership of their losses. You blame your losses on bring unlucky. That is a recipe for disaster. I'll check back after the games are complete. Your momma was unlucky the day you were born. 102? |
vanzack | 99 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues:
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799: @C-70Blues You are the last person who should say this. All you do is complain when someone doesn't agree with your view I haven't called a single person on this board a degenerate. Also, did you play the prop I posted for Monday Night? I wagered a 1/2 unit, that's half of one unit, and I'm way ahead of vanzack who has been posting every week. It's more advantageous to pick your spots instead of betting half the board every week. Less is more. Now lets do the last 7 years.... I will go first. Average +65 units per season. Not one losing season. You? The "pick your spots" position is so dumb. So I am going to limit myself to a certain number of plays per week? Some arbitrary quantity in an arbitrary time period? What if this weeks 4th best pick that doesnt make the list is next weeks best pick? I win with edges and volume. When you have an edge, the more volume the better. Thats simply how it works. Keep doing your thing. It is kind of funny how 100 of your 150 lifetime posts are in my threads. Countdown to 101.... |
vanzack | 99 |
|
|
@C-70Blues Degens is a term of endearment around here. You are not included. You are not a degen. Buzz off. |
vanzack | 99 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by CaseyMcGehee:
VZ I know you’re an exchange guy, are you on ProphetX? If so someone is hanging a line Dallas +3.5 at -109. I grabbed a healthy amount but there’s still close to 11k up for grabs. I was able to get on 3/6 of your plays at mathematically break even or better lines. Check out 4casters also. Just incredible liquidity. Right now, can get Ravens -8 -108 for as much as you want. Exchanges cant be beat. Everyone that takes on the vig argument with me is just telling me they dont know what an exchange is without telling me they dont know what an exchange is. GL |
vanzack | 99 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Boisestateand8:
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: NFL Season Record -12.0 units NFL Sunday * Packers +2.5 (3 units) * Ravens -9.5 (3 units) * Titans -3 (2.5 units) * Chargers -1 (2.5 units) * Cowboys +3.25 (2 units) * Bears +1 (2 units) GL degens With you on the Packers. Also like the Bills. You have any thoughts on that one Van? Miami if anyone for me. But I laid off because of their offense. It would be a bet on potential rather than what I have seen and I dont like to do that. Not sure the Dolphins offense can backdoor cover which is a big component of taking 6.5. GL though. |
vanzack | 99 |
|
|
NFL Season Record -12.0 units * Packers +2.5 (3 units) GL degens
|
vanzack | 99 |
|
|
NO BET ON JETS / TEXANS GL to all
|
vanzack | 109 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TJZags598:
@vanzack I sensed you are obsessive, in a good way. maybe a better word is driven. Driven is the only way to be successful. I agree with diminishing returns. there is sometime too much information to cover, and absorb. I used to analyze games, actually over analyze. Then I simplified things substantially. Focused on less time on studying football, and sticking to basics. You are definitely a very good handicapper. My strength is data analytics. Its all just data to me. Our wager styles are different. You do great for your style. I do extremely well, i do alot of live wagers; my best wager this weekend was Broncos -4.5 (-188) after Carolina scored first. Different styles. Well, i respect that you take the time to post here. Respect. |
vanzack | 109 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: Anyone watching BTC today? Should make any sports betting stuff meaningless. Absolutely. With the Fed’s endless money printing, BTC will continue to appreciate in price. ETF’s have been approved which will also ensure annual TWAP by financial institutions. current generation is priced out of owning their own home but not yet priced out of owning some BTC. Something we can definitely agree on. |
vanzack | 109 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Eddy_Winslow:
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: Anyone watching BTC today? Should make any sports betting stuff meaningless. yes, and yes. 73,550 ATH = 73,750 |
vanzack | 109 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TJZags598:
@vanzack I respect the work you put in. I lurk, i also consider your perspective. I bet we would have some conversations about football. Basic question: Do you think all the time you put in is worth it? Great question. I think there is diminishing returns at work here. I think 10 hours is where I get 75% done, and the other 70 hours are 25%. But I am an obsessive person, and if I miss a line move because I wasn't paying attention it kills me. It is only 5 months a year, then for 3 months (soccer Feb - May) it is 10 hours - then summers are free. So overall - it is better than a 9-5. And for me, I have come to accept it is all or nothing. Character flaw. |
vanzack | 109 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TJZags598:
@vanzack Yes, i monitor the game as i watch it. The Giants played well, they deserved to win, I thought. They were the better team last night. Steelers definitely got alot of the intangible plays in their favor. One bet i did lose last night? George Pickens, first TD. +650. Thats the breaks Ouch |
vanzack | 109 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.