Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
@warrenator No. You obviously haven’t watched a Philly game. its like trying to watch a poodle jerk off with super glue |
nfl_brosuf | 62 |
|
|
@Martylee Worse it was fields. If you are going to throw 25 yards down field in a snowstorm maybe not use your second string qb |
nfl_brosuf | 62 |
|
|
To be fair it’s almost not fair for Pittsburgh to be able to wear white in a snow game.
Jameis already has a hard time seeing safety’s and corners. Now they are basically camouflage |
nfl_brosuf | 62 |
|
|
God I really wish Pittsburgh tried to throw the ball before the blizzard rolled in. Or called a timeout instead of rolling the clock with 1:30 minutes left at half. Or didn’t put fields in for third downs.
just a comedy of errors. fingers crossed browns have ball security issues |
nfl_brosuf | 62 |
|
|
@fer44 Under? I took the over. You scared me thinking I wrote under. |
Weeds1079 | 18 |
|
|
@Maukaboy
I thought I put the quotes in, this is the sharp Sportsbook out of ohio
Where the sharps and public are, and all other things TNF at : Steelers -3.5/total 37 "Twice as much smart money on PIT than CLE." But overall: "Handle on both sides is pretty evenly matched. But if we got a dream outcome, we would love PIT by 5 to beat the straight bets, including those who bought points. "Or PIT by 11 to beat teasers." On the total: "Total isn't much of a decision, but we need Over 37 for a cup of coffee."
this is super book that takes respectable money out of Vegas
NFL Week 12 Odds: Unlike the situation at other sportsbooks,
needs Steelers at the moment, for TNF vs. Browns. "We have more tickets on the Steelers, but more money on the Browns. So right now, we're rooting for a Steelers cover." – Risk manager Casey Degnon (
|
Weeds1079 | 23 |
|
|
to answer the obvious question
did you really just fade superbook sharps? yes, sharp money on the browns has lost all year. If prime sports was sharp on browns I would have considered it.
and yes I feel teasing the over is safer than teasing the under. Not one poster on covers has taken the over publicly (maybe a few) That’s weird the public (you/me) aren’t playing the over in a televised game. (No offense) |
Weeds1079 | 23 |
|
|
so superbook in Vegas has been known to take larger bets from respectable people.
NFL Week 12 Odds: Unlike the situation at other sportsbooks, @SuperBookSports needs Steelers at the moment, for TNF vs. Browns. “We have more tickets on the Steelers, but more money on the Browns. So right now, we're rooting for a Steelers cover." – Risk manager Casey Degnon
THIS IS THE SHARP BOOK OUT OF OHIO Where the sharps and public are, and all other things TNF at @primesportsbook, per : Steelers -3.5/total 37 "Twice as much smart money on PIT than CLE." But overall: "Handle on both sides is pretty evenly matched. But if we got a dream outcome, we would love PIT by 5 to beat the straight bets, including those who bought points. "Or PIT by 11 to beat teasers." On the total: "Total isn't much of a decision, but we need Over 37 for a cup of coffee."
the sharp money and we have covered it is. browns +3.5 under 41
I spent most of the day dwelling on how bad the sharps have been on nfl totals and the browns this year. It’s uncanny how many unders have gone over in the early 4th quarter that had respected money. Honestly I wish I could play the prop ”will the browns lose in gut punch fashion?” At +150 I can’t though. I do like the fact both superbook and prime (both sharp action books) need Pitt. I trust both more than mgm and draft kings. Pitt Ml parlayed to over 33 1unit pitt -5 at plus money 1 unit
have a good night weeds
|
Weeds1079 | 23 |
|
|
Dude please look at my thread “betting info for tnf”. I have the ticket/ handle for multiple books both online and Vegas. I think you might be misinformed or read the line wrong. It happens, no biggie, but the money is firmly on the Steelers.
i hope this helps, and if not, best of luck on your wagers tonight |
Buttabing | 20 |
|
|
Thanks guys for letting me throw a few innings. Have a good rest of your night. weeds. |
Weeds1079 | 18 |
|
|
@buffer Do people that sell plays move lines? Idk. Maybe? But if you are asking if the 100 people that bet his plays move the line…no, the risk Manager doesn’t care. Not even a little. from what I have seen and witnessed the people that move lines don’t have a side hustle on selling plays. Why bring that attention? Why screw the book that is okay with you playing and not limiting you to action size? You and the risk manager are on first name basis, why destroy that. You get freedom to wager, the risk maker gets to take a position that benefits the book and a better profit than just vig . Pros usually are into statistics/actuary/ finance, extremely disciplined, bet 1 or 2 games when the lines come out, and disappear. They don’t have websites, a business card, and not in the gallery watching the game. |
Weeds1079 | 18 |
|
|
Most bet (tickets) Steelers-Browns player props at #BetMGM 1. George Pickens over 58.5 receiving yards 2. Russell Wilson over 182.5 passing yards 3. Najee Harris over 17.5 rushing attempts 4. Jameis Winston over 216.5 passing yards 5. Najee Harris over 67.5 rushing yards
first thing I notice? why is nick chubb not being played heavy? 25mph wind and rain? Any time td is +150 for Chubb and if the sharps are right Cleveland is coming to play, why dafuque are they not playing plus money? the next thing? jameis Winston has thrown for over 300 in 2/3 games. Pitt has given up under 215 last two. That passing total came out 213. Money firmly on over. What could go wrong? |
Weeds1079 | 23 |
|
|
Very welcome. Glad I haven’t ruined your afternoon…..yet. Haha im superstitious. Let’s let this thread die until after the second game. I’m a little weird when it comes to getting excited before the games are done. |
Weeds1079 | 18 |
|
|
Early sharp play on NFL Week 12 odds: CaesarsSports, per Joey Feazel: Commanders -10, vs Cowboys Ravens-Chargers Over 48/48.5. @BorgataSports, per tgablesports Browns +4.5/+4, vs. Steelers in TNF Eagles-Rams Over 48/48.5
borgata is mgm property in Atlantic City. Shocking they have sharp on the eagles over. Just kidding. |
Weeds1079 | 12 |
|
|
Today I’m like a pitcher in spring training playing a few innings to try and find his curve.
Fau comes out +1.5 at both mgm and Caesar’s . stuck on the overnight at various juice. Line flips to pick early morning, then to -1.5 in an hour. MGM got buy back but it was short lived. Dk as always followed suit. dk 59% tickets and 81% money on fau spread 65% tickets and 89% money on fau ml
the play Fau -1.5
|
Weeds1079 | 18 |
|
|
First update
Public bettors Steelers on #TNF:
87% of tickets , 93% of money on PIT -3.5 at CircaSports 84% of tickets, 90% of money on PIT -3.5 at 82% of tickets, 67% of money on PIT -3.5 at 81% of tickets, 64% of money on PIT -3.5 at 78% of tickets, 80% of money on PIT -3.5 at
Updated Steelers-Browns betting at #BetMGMsteelers open -4.5, now -3.5 90% of bets, 84% of money on Steelers
Total open 40.5, now 37 54% of bets, 50% of money on Over open +200, now +165 23% of bets, 11% of money on Browns
what I see? yesterday mgm was 54tickets/ 75% money on under and now it’s a two way street 50/50 action. Did the increased money move the total from 37? Nope. Nothing respected came in, so mgm is holding on their under position. personally o/u sharp has sucked all year in nfl. But unless I see buyback I might tease this out to under 41 and play Pitt on ml. I’m more comfortable with taking Wilson and his huge hands (Google it) that played in rainy Seattle for years over Jameis who hasn’t played a cold weather game since 2016 (played Minny last year and it was 52 degrees, he was okay). the X factor is Chubb, his stats are good against Pitt, but I don’t trust the coach to do the logical thing. IM STILL IN A HOLDING PATTERN |
Weeds1079 | 23 |
|
|
Yes. I’m actually on my way to Caesar’s now |
Weeds1079 | 18 |
|
|
@buffer Idk those 4 teams are on the lopsided ticket list at dk espnbet bet-on (not Texans) initial movement was against texans, K.C. aren’t covering machines. Although dd favs are 5-0 this year. It has just as good a chance as any other 4 teamer. Don’t go in thinking those teams can’t possibly lose. I guess that’s my advice. |
Weeds1079 | 23 |
|
|
I usually don’t get into college until after the invitationals. Let’s see how rusty i am.
drake line comes out at mgm at 10.5 and shoots to 9.5 in first hour, rebounds, and settles back to 9.5. Caesars it falls but with resistance, basically spin cycling between 10-10.5. Line sits 10 now. dk 71% of bets and 64% of money on Miami no injuries reported
Drake +9.5
|
Weeds1079 | 18 |
|
|
Sorry wrong forum |
Weeds1079 | 4 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.