X-Files

You're UCLA +680 ML was a highly profitable investment along with a live bet on the other side once UCLA went ahead 54-53. 

Guaranteed at least +3 units no matter which side won. 

https://www.ncaa.com/scoreboard/basketball-men/d1

Winner.

68-55.

How do you objectively deduce the grit factor? 

Time will tell if the Leafs "Big 3" win a cup. They're relatively young & it took Ovie many years to end his oft repeated annual playoff flopping. Check back in 2027 or 2032.

“They’ve had a coaching change, they have fans in the building (back to 50% full Monday), we’re expecting them to come hard,” Rielly had warned in the morning. “They’ve found their game. It’s always a good battle when we play them. This is not the time of year to be overlooking teams. Guys are playing for their jobs, coaches are trying to get stuff right.”

https://torontosun.com/sports/hockey/nhl/toronto-maple-leafs/miserable-monday-maple-leafs-embarrassed-in-montreal

Mondays a good day to bet dogs? 

The Leafs lost to Arizona not long ago. 

Ovie was a regular season success, post season flop, for many years.

Until he won it all. 

"2021-2022 YTD 98-94, +16.79 units

2020-2021: 101-70, +64 units"

"New Mexico St -2½ over Seattle

10:00 PM EST. There’s a really good chance that this game decides 1st place in the WAC, as both Seattle and New Mexico St are right at the top of the conference with a 12-2 mark. New Mexico St will be a double-digit favorite in its three remaining games after this so this is “the’ game for them. 

For Seattle, this is unchartered waters, as they have only been around since the early 2000’s (Seattle had a college team way back in the 50’s and 60’s). As the regular season comes to a near close, Seattle is a nice team but they are far and away the second best team here and the Aggies of New Mexico State will be on a mission to remind them of that here. 

Last year, New Mexico State couldn’t practice or play games in its own STATE let alone its own home court arena. The Aggies played their home games at Eastwood HS in El Paso, TX and their practice time was anything but normal. So, you can see how Chris Jans finished an uncharacteristic 7-6 in the WAC. NMSU’s other three WAC finishes under Jans? 16-0, 15-1, and 12-2. This season Jans has arguably his most talented team ever with four starters back and a slew of transfers (per usual). Now we ask you, who would you rather get behind in a big game like this that will ultimately settle the regular season winner? NMSU and it’s wealth of talent and experience or a Seattle team that played one of the easiest non-conference schedules in the country and that has never been this close before?

Seattle’s toughest opponent this year was in fact these Aggies, a game they would lose by 15 points back in Las Cruces. The Redhawks next toughest? Washington State perhaps? They lost that one by 18. Next toughest? UNLV maybe? They lost that one by 20. The Redhawks non-conference Strength of Schedule ranked 352nd in the country but all the market sees is a 21-6 overall record.   

New Mexico State’s non conference Strength of Schedule ranked 66th in the country, which is close to 300 positions better than Seattle. The Aggies beat Davidson by 11 and they also beat Washington State among others. Its 22-4 record is vastly more impressive than Seattle’s because they played real teams while Seattle feasted on nobodies.

After last year’s ridiculous season that must be tossed out the window, New Mexico State now gets a chance to take its rightful spot at top of the conference, a conference it has dominated for eight straight years (we're throwing out last year). Prior to this season under Jans, NMSU is a ridiculous 43-3 in conference play; they’ve made the tournament every year (asterisk on 2020 season) Jans been employed and no team has come even within two games of the Aggies’ final league record in that time span. They’re the most talented team in the WAC, they’re the most experienced, and they have the best coach. Now make your choice. New Mexico State Aggies or the Seattle Imposters?"

3-0 & Colorado St pending?

Good question. 

11-0? 

Damn Toledo. Nine point fav loses by 10. 18-5 vs 11-11 team. WTF. 

Another great thread of yours with, as usual, very little, if any, negativity, & many positive posts. 

With everyone contributing, even those who are useful as fade material, even experienced bettors can learn something from the site's many threads. As well as from feedback in their own threads.

From giving of ones God given talents to others freely comes good karma. IOW it comes back to you in spades. For example, after helping others daily on online forums for months to win at sports gambling, i won over 200 units in the space of a mere 3 months. BTW I have & intend to continue to donate that & future winnings to some charitable causes. 

Winning & profiting is fun. Losing $ isn't. Don't burn yourself out. Be wary of mixing drugs with gambling. Best of luck with all your investments going forward. Live long & prosper. 

Not banned.

Drinking, sleeping, whoring, figuring out what to do with 10K + in profits? And then doing it?

And how to start winning the next 10K +? 

@Coach55

I like to hedge when i have larger bets. I imagine there were books offering Boise at huge + odds late in the 2H if anyone wanted to lock in a free shot on either team, or a guaranteed profit either way. Locking in a free shot on Fresno should have only cost pennies on the dollar. 

"Book Needs...

HIGH on Denmark +475 (Regulation)

Low on Denmark +548 (1st H) & Denmark +255 TO ADVANCE (Full)

High Level

Full: 19-15 +13.0u

1st Half: 20-11 +15.9u

L5 Yrs Full: +301.6u

Low Level

Full: 14-24 -6.2u

1st Half: 14-20 -2.4u

DBacks -15.7 units as Low Level Need"

"Yesterday the book got EXACTLY what it wanted.

Today the book DOES NOT want England to advance. So, if they lose in regulation, AET or PK's, the book's happy!

Max return outcome would be Denmark in regulation. There's decent DRAW action today."

TSP

At the pub, of course.