Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Was there a line in this game? From twitter: Bayern Munich have played Rottach-Egern three times since 2018 - 20-2 in 2018 - 23-0 in 2019 - 27-0 in 2023 An aggregate score of 70-2 over three matches |
xar86413 | 2 |
|
|
The opening total for Sunday's game is 19.5. The ingame for game 1's total is sitting at 27 with the score 11-12 in the 7th. I was trying to figure out the highest total ever for an MLB game, and the highest I could find was 14.5 for a Rockies game back a few years. This total will blow that out of the water.
|
xar86413 | 1 |
|
|
It's not crossing any key numbers, but that line has been solid at +2.5 all week, and now 20 mins before kick it drops a point. I wonder if Tua is not starting now?
|
Drew61 | 10 |
|
|
Line dropping down to +1.5 in the last 30 mins.. Anyone know why? |
Drew61 | 10 |
|
|
Davis comes out for the 9th?
|
Pags-Picks | 21 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by doobies: whats up with people always talking about "oh you only got 10 posts"? who the f cares how many post someone has. lol WOW you got 1k post on covers, you must be proud of yourself. half of these clowns just post "gl" on everyones thread! I will be following this system very closely. |
AlfYams | 72 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa: no |
jimc0911 | 112 |
|
|
Is Messi available off the bench?
|
jimc0911 | 112 |
|
|
Game on.
|
RiggedNation | 11 |
|
|
I had the over 12.5 in a Rockies game a few years ago. It was 17-13 in the 8th inning for Colorado and it started raining, hard. Colorado couldn't stop hitting. They put 11 runners on in the inning and put up another six runs. 23-13. With two outs and the rain coming down in buckets they called the game.
This was a monday night game too (at that time I had to pay my guy on the tuesday), and it was a bailout play for me so I had over a grand on it. Which would have put me below the threshold to pay. I was half way to the bar to celebrate and I checked my phone and saw the most awful thing ever. FINAL8. So my celebration at the bar turned into a drowning of my sorrows trip.
|
RiggedNation | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TheGoldenGoose: -300 or even -400 Baseball Lines. 1997 through 2003 Pedro Martinez was 118-36 in those 7 years. Complete dominance. We could be witnessing the same type of stretch run here with Kershaw. I'm not ready to crown him yet but getting close. GL tonight Key. If you want to crown his behind, then crown him!!
|
KeyElement | 44 |
|
|
Interesting points.
I have found success with ingame wagering on games at about the 15 minute mark. If there are situations where it's 1-1 or 2-0 after the 15 minute mark, there is a very good chance of 4 goals or more in that game. Both teams have shown an ability to score, and that is very important. I like the 2-0 situation particularly if the home team is down 0-2. Also, usually the oddsmakers will tell you what is expected to happen. I've seen ingame lines of 2.5o -150 at the 30 minute mark of a 0-0 game. Chances are it will be 1-0 at the half, and then 2 or three more in the 2h. I tend to play more overs, just because I hate having a game that is a dead under spoiled by an own goal, or a penalty. Just my two cents. |
Golazo | 8 |
|
|
players*
|
xar86413 | 4 |
|
|
As a former BAD player, I've always wondered if Bookies collected the data of their players. For once I'm on the side that has that ability. I have several plays, and not one of them win. EVER. I've paid out small amounts, and have collected consistently ever since I set up the site. Surely there is a way I can use this data.
|
xar86413 | 4 |
|
|
I wrote a pretty elaborate website to record my buddies bets that I was taking.
After about 6 months I realized I had one buddy that just never really was able to win anything. He bets the same amount every play, and according to my website, after 1000 plus plays, he's down over 10k based on a $100 wager. We play for real money and we meet up once a week to settle. He usually pays me $2-$500 a week. So now I'm thinking that I should just let him play and set up an account and play the opposite. He can keep making installments, and I can make money on his picks. Basically I have the golden goose. I'm even thinking of forgiving like 5k of his debt just to keep him on the hook. This is six months of 20+ plays a day. Poor guy can't pick a winner. The only thing that concerns me is that as a former player, if my account with REAL money got up there, I would blow it just like my test subject. Wouldn't you love to go back and bet the opposite of all the bets you've ever made?
|
xar86413 | 4 |
|
|
Iona starts VERY slowly and shoots very poorly, and they still reached 77 points at the half.
I will be pounding the 2h over.
|
xar86413 | 6 |
|
|
I'm going to wait until the 2h. Iona is the 5th ranked offense in the country in the 2h. This makes sense as they like to run their opponents ragged and they are too tired to play defense the longer the game goes.
I follow Iona closely and the line the oddsmakers have posted is not consistent.
|
xar86413 | 6 |
|
|
Totals is dropping like a stone in this one (opened at 153) and I can't understand why. Iona averages 82pts per game, and likes to turn every game into a track meet.
Can anyone shed light on this at all? I don't know much about UCSB but it looks like they like to play a slower style game, but Iona doesn't play any defense either so game usually are fast paced.
|
xar86413 | 6 |
|
|
Does anyone know how books like Bodog or Sportsinteraction can have ingame lines on Ukranian U18 soccer games, and 40 other games going on all at the same time?
I realize that most of the lines are generated from some kind of algorithm, for instance a soccer game that has an over under of 2.5 -110 the under odds will increase as time increases, but there has to be a human element involved as well. For instance, one night there was almost nothing to bet on except this Russian U19 soccer game. I'm a degenerate so I threw a few nickles down on the total, and I found a live stream. These guys were 17 year old high school kids basically playing at this tiny field, and there were maybe 20 people watching the match. Now my book SIA had the live ingame and sure enough, everytime something happened, like a goal, yellow card or injury, the odds would go off the board and get calculated again, and then pop back up. My point is, no computer can do everything. There has to be an actual person in a room watching 20 games at the same time and entering data into a computer which will adjust the odds accordingly. At least this is what I think happens. There is almost no information available on this topic, and I assume it's because the books don't want you to know too much about how the system is run. I'm curious if any of you guys can shed some light here. Thanks.
|
xar86413 | 1 |
|
|
I will be following this thread very closely.
|
SLAYER007 | 39 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.