nrl judiciary

Question

The Travis Burns grading is so over the top it's laughable, 17 weeks is like comparing what he did to the Luke O donnell elbow from a few years ago

And 5 weeks for GI feels like too much, i thought 2 was fair

Luckylunchbox · Answer

The Travis Burns grading is so over the top it's laughable, 17 weeks is like comparing what he did to the Luke O donnell elbow from a few years ago

And 5 weeks for GI feels like too much, i thought 2 was fair

rod_steel · Answer

Isn&#x27;t Burns hit with 2 offences?

Luckylunchbox · Answer

True, Chicken wing  5 High shot 12 i think, But that high shot was sloppy but no damage was done

Davenz · Answer

Travis Burns grading is fair IMO.....massive intent in both cases.

Luckylunchbox · Answer

Which is worse Burns high shot or this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypODBSW3wSs&amp;feature=related

snake2710 · Answer

What both Ross and White did is far worse than what Burns did i think that 5-8 weeks all up would be fair for both. No more than that. He did not intentially try to tackle high just jumped becoz he is a small guy.

GI should get 2 weeks. DONE

Davenz · Answer

I was just looking for the Danny Williams king hit, looks like its been removed from youtube

Luckylunchbox · Answer

i was looking for it too

Davenz · Answer

Weird eh, no sign of it anywhere.

Aussie Battler · Answer

Yeah,12 weeks is way overkill for the high shot.

Aussie Battler · Answer

&#xD;&#xA;12 weeks for a stiff arm? Please..

nrl judiciary

Hot Forum Topics