Playin defense for the whole game. These guys sit back and let Spain control the game. Where was the attacking football we saw against England and Argentina? Even Paraguay could have beaten Germany today. Uruguay will beat Germany.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
WTF was that.
Playin defense for the whole game. These guys sit back and let Spain control the game. Where was the attacking football we saw against England and Argentina? Even Paraguay could have beaten Germany today. Uruguay will beat Germany.
germany were/are the kings of counter attack. they have played like that the whole tourney...
you feel like they were attacking because it worked on the past and they scored lots of goals... this time it failed, because spain had a good game plan putting Pedro in for Torres on the right side, not to score but to counter schweinsteiger.. and Iniesta on the left.. that took away the counter attack.
i said like a week ago, that even thou Germany was superior to argentina... argentina had a better shot at beating Spain... its just a bad matchup for germany.
0
mmm did u watch those games??
germany were/are the kings of counter attack. they have played like that the whole tourney...
you feel like they were attacking because it worked on the past and they scored lots of goals... this time it failed, because spain had a good game plan putting Pedro in for Torres on the right side, not to score but to counter schweinsteiger.. and Iniesta on the left.. that took away the counter attack.
i said like a week ago, that even thou Germany was superior to argentina... argentina had a better shot at beating Spain... its just a bad matchup for germany.
Argentina/England - early goal and the counter.attack. Serbia - no early goal, Serbia scores - Germany has no answer. Spain - no early goal, Spain scores - Germany has no answer.
But they are good at counter-attacking when it goes according to plan.
0
LOL ..this is how they play. COUNTER-ATTACKING.
Argentina/England - early goal and the counter.attack. Serbia - no early goal, Serbia scores - Germany has no answer. Spain - no early goal, Spain scores - Germany has no answer.
But they are good at counter-attacking when it goes according to plan.
Spain THOROUGHLY outplayed Germany and completely dictated the game. They deserved to win. As far as "level of play" goes... I would actually go on record as stating the Spain dominated Germany.
0
How about this?..................
Spain THOROUGHLY outplayed Germany and completely dictated the game. They deserved to win. As far as "level of play" goes... I would actually go on record as stating the Spain dominated Germany.
Germany fails to play their offensive attacking game. They try to play the Spain playing style....slow & defensive. Germany didn't take any outside shot...but just trying to get close to net!
I think Germany will play better against U-team on Sat. They will be in attacking mode again. 3rd place---is just meaningless , and the Germany will be more relax & will score another 4 goals again!!!! Both teams are very offensive, so i think this should be a high scoring game.
0
Germany fails to play their offensive attacking game. They try to play the Spain playing style....slow & defensive. Germany didn't take any outside shot...but just trying to get close to net!
I think Germany will play better against U-team on Sat. They will be in attacking mode again. 3rd place---is just meaningless , and the Germany will be more relax & will score another 4 goals again!!!! Both teams are very offensive, so i think this should be a high scoring game.
Argentina/England - early goal and the counter.attack. Serbia - no early goal, Serbia scores - Germany has no answer. Spain - no early goal, Spain scores - Germany has no answer.
But they are good at counter-attacking when it goes according to plan.
Yeah, seems Germany doesn't have a plan B, do they?
0
Quote Originally Posted by RJSmith:
LOL ..this is how they play. COUNTER-ATTACKING.
Argentina/England - early goal and the counter.attack. Serbia - no early goal, Serbia scores - Germany has no answer. Spain - no early goal, Spain scores - Germany has no answer.
But they are good at counter-attacking when it goes according to plan.
Yeah, seems Germany doesn't have a plan B, do they?
Aside from the fact Ozil was fouled inside the penalty area just before half-time and the poor officiating at this WC continued with no penalty awarded, Germany let Spain play its possession game unhindered inside the 1st 6/10ths of the field. They sat back and waited for that possession game to come to them. What did Spain do when germany had possession anywhere on the field? they were almost always immediately at the ball-carrier like a rash.
Germany weren't outclassed (which is an assertion that no matter what they'd done they'd have been beaten anyway, such is what class does to the classless), they simply paid the price for pathetic tactics. They failed to get in Spain's face, and made Spain look like world beaters, when in fact this Spanish team is absolutely toothless on attack sans David villa being involved. If the Dutch get in Spanish faces all day long, and bottle up David Villa, Spain will not hoist the trophy.
0
Aside from the fact Ozil was fouled inside the penalty area just before half-time and the poor officiating at this WC continued with no penalty awarded, Germany let Spain play its possession game unhindered inside the 1st 6/10ths of the field. They sat back and waited for that possession game to come to them. What did Spain do when germany had possession anywhere on the field? they were almost always immediately at the ball-carrier like a rash.
Germany weren't outclassed (which is an assertion that no matter what they'd done they'd have been beaten anyway, such is what class does to the classless), they simply paid the price for pathetic tactics. They failed to get in Spain's face, and made Spain look like world beaters, when in fact this Spanish team is absolutely toothless on attack sans David villa being involved. If the Dutch get in Spanish faces all day long, and bottle up David Villa, Spain will not hoist the trophy.
^^you obviously have no conception of the penalty area - see that little half circle at the top of the screen (the ball rolls over it between the 1 sec & 2 sec mark, when its clearly visible)? thats marked on the edge of the penalty area. Since the players are passed it (the 1 sec mark) before Ozil goes down (2 sec mark) clearly makes a mockery of the suggestion it happened outside the penalty area.
Second, that video begins too late in the sequence, and has the wrong angle. The slowmo replay from behind those players during the actual game itself clearly showed the Spaniard making contact (which is ever so briefly visible at the start of the linked video).
As for the suggestion its a dive, well, anyone wanting to argue it wasnt a real penalty is going to say nothing else, given the Spanish player made contact with Ozil. The circumstances of that contact? Ozil had the ball, and no other immediate defender stood between himself and the goalkeeper. So if you're a Spanish defender, and a youre the only 1 between an opposition player going 1 on 1 with your goalie, and you're on the wrong side of that player to directly challenge for the ball (here the ball wasnt between the 2 players, it was on Ozil's right, and the defender was on Ozil's left), you have only 1 task - to do anything necessary to prevent that player getting his shot off. The Spaniard did so, and the ref did nothing about it.
0
^^you obviously have no conception of the penalty area - see that little half circle at the top of the screen (the ball rolls over it between the 1 sec & 2 sec mark, when its clearly visible)? thats marked on the edge of the penalty area. Since the players are passed it (the 1 sec mark) before Ozil goes down (2 sec mark) clearly makes a mockery of the suggestion it happened outside the penalty area.
Second, that video begins too late in the sequence, and has the wrong angle. The slowmo replay from behind those players during the actual game itself clearly showed the Spaniard making contact (which is ever so briefly visible at the start of the linked video).
As for the suggestion its a dive, well, anyone wanting to argue it wasnt a real penalty is going to say nothing else, given the Spanish player made contact with Ozil. The circumstances of that contact? Ozil had the ball, and no other immediate defender stood between himself and the goalkeeper. So if you're a Spanish defender, and a youre the only 1 between an opposition player going 1 on 1 with your goalie, and you're on the wrong side of that player to directly challenge for the ball (here the ball wasnt between the 2 players, it was on Ozil's right, and the defender was on Ozil's left), you have only 1 task - to do anything necessary to prevent that player getting his shot off. The Spaniard did so, and the ref did nothing about it.
the penalty arc is not part of the penalty area... bye
no shit sherlock - read my post and watch the video again. Ozil comes down AFTER THEY HAVE PASSED THE CIRCLE TIP AT THE TOP OF THE PENALTY BOX, meaning - for those who have at least 1 brain with which to process logic - he came down inside the penalty area
0
the penalty arc is not part of the penalty area... bye
no shit sherlock - read my post and watch the video again. Ozil comes down AFTER THEY HAVE PASSED THE CIRCLE TIP AT THE TOP OF THE PENALTY BOX, meaning - for those who have at least 1 brain with which to process logic - he came down inside the penalty area
doesnt matter were he goes down.. the foul was made at the circle (outside the penalty area)... he could roll all the way next the goalie, it doesnt matter.
anyone with eyes can see the foul was committed outside, and that video is not the best one because it actually looks like a dive...
the replay from behind the players you can clearly see that it is not a dive and that he was outside.
just to point out: it should have been called a foul and free kick, and no red card since he already had two other players closing in on him.
0
doesnt matter were he goes down.. the foul was made at the circle (outside the penalty area)... he could roll all the way next the goalie, it doesnt matter.
anyone with eyes can see the foul was committed outside, and that video is not the best one because it actually looks like a dive...
the replay from behind the players you can clearly see that it is not a dive and that he was outside.
just to point out: it should have been called a foul and free kick, and no red card since he already had two other players closing in on him.
You need to go back & look at the video again - the red youtube band is almost 30 cm long. Stop the counter at 5 centimetres (pointing at the counter still registers it as 0.00 time gone), and you'll see (1) the Spanish player is still holding Ozil's arm (near the end of his interference) at the point (2) where Ozil's right foot is almost on the ground and, at the same time, well past the line that separates the top of the penalty area from the circle tip - at said point Ozil still hadn't started to fall (Ozil is upright at the beginning of this video clip, which starts as they're in that circle tip, but outside the penalty box), & only began that fall when his right foot hit the ground inside the Pbox. Ozil was being interfered with while inside the penalty box, and before he fell.
0
You need to go back & look at the video again - the red youtube band is almost 30 cm long. Stop the counter at 5 centimetres (pointing at the counter still registers it as 0.00 time gone), and you'll see (1) the Spanish player is still holding Ozil's arm (near the end of his interference) at the point (2) where Ozil's right foot is almost on the ground and, at the same time, well past the line that separates the top of the penalty area from the circle tip - at said point Ozil still hadn't started to fall (Ozil is upright at the beginning of this video clip, which starts as they're in that circle tip, but outside the penalty box), & only began that fall when his right foot hit the ground inside the Pbox. Ozil was being interfered with while inside the penalty box, and before he fell.
No way that was a penalty on Ozil the guy put his hand on him and Ozil took a dive
You're an idiot. The defender kicked Oezil in the left Achilles' tendon, which knocked his left foot into his right leg and tripped him up. It has nothing to do with the defender's hand.
0
No way that was a penalty on Ozil the guy put his hand on him and Ozil took a dive
You're an idiot. The defender kicked Oezil in the left Achilles' tendon, which knocked his left foot into his right leg and tripped him up. It has nothing to do with the defender's hand.
if germany had played in the same penetrative way they played against england and argentina they might be playing on sunday and not today.
Low's tactics had been spot on on previous rounds but for some reason he chose to sit back against the spaniards and let them play their football.
They missed Muller no doubt but they showed spain far too much respect. Despite all this, they could have easily taken the lead from Troos's chance, 3 mins before puyol scored and then who knows what would have happened
0
if germany had played in the same penetrative way they played against england and argentina they might be playing on sunday and not today.
Low's tactics had been spot on on previous rounds but for some reason he chose to sit back against the spaniards and let them play their football.
They missed Muller no doubt but they showed spain far too much respect. Despite all this, they could have easily taken the lead from Troos's chance, 3 mins before puyol scored and then who knows what would have happened
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
