7pm New England vs Montreal - Team with horrendous away record that has put together a good streak due to home wins vs a decent home team in a winless streak - no play.
7pm Philadelphia vs Chicago - I'm surprised the odds are how they are, as Philly have turned it around and really, Chicago has had some great results but their extremely defensive style of play suits them against teams that are brilliant at home, and even then they don't get that away win. Philly are above average but nothing special, therefore Chicago will lately come out of their shell a bit more, perfect for Philadelphia. Philly has 4 straight wins at home and Chicago can hang so I'd hesitate taking them straight up, but a pk line is perfect here. Philadelphia pk
11pm Chivas vs Galaxy - I've been advocating Galaxy over away plays, and will continue it here even though this matchup hasn't resulted in many goals, however the Galaxy's strategy has changed. Chivas are typically a very defensive home team, but a feature here this season has been close low-scoring games against defensive away teams, and higher scoring matches against the teams who do attack. This is a night game, heat won't be a factor, Galaxy fans usually fill up the empty seats for this match so the crowd will be at 50/50, and Galaxy know the Chivas can't possibly match their firepower. Over 2.5
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
7pm New England vs Montreal - Team with horrendous away record that has put together a good streak due to home wins vs a decent home team in a winless streak - no play.
7pm Philadelphia vs Chicago - I'm surprised the odds are how they are, as Philly have turned it around and really, Chicago has had some great results but their extremely defensive style of play suits them against teams that are brilliant at home, and even then they don't get that away win. Philly are above average but nothing special, therefore Chicago will lately come out of their shell a bit more, perfect for Philadelphia. Philly has 4 straight wins at home and Chicago can hang so I'd hesitate taking them straight up, but a pk line is perfect here. Philadelphia pk
11pm Chivas vs Galaxy - I've been advocating Galaxy over away plays, and will continue it here even though this matchup hasn't resulted in many goals, however the Galaxy's strategy has changed. Chivas are typically a very defensive home team, but a feature here this season has been close low-scoring games against defensive away teams, and higher scoring matches against the teams who do attack. This is a night game, heat won't be a factor, Galaxy fans usually fill up the empty seats for this match so the crowd will be at 50/50, and Galaxy know the Chivas can't possibly match their firepower. Over 2.5
Thanks for your write-up. Really like the over 2.5. Very tempted to take NE +100 and LA galaxy -115 to win (not draw, or lose), but no beckham got me worried....I got burned big when LA lost @ Chivas and beckham came into the game around the 70th minute when LA was already down. My book (william hill) doesn't offer over/under or spreads on MLS, so I'm looking for a playable play.....
If you were to place a wager on philadephia to win (not draw, or lose) what odds would you play it @? (for instance over +150, or under +190).
0
Thanks for your write-up. Really like the over 2.5. Very tempted to take NE +100 and LA galaxy -115 to win (not draw, or lose), but no beckham got me worried....I got burned big when LA lost @ Chivas and beckham came into the game around the 70th minute when LA was already down. My book (william hill) doesn't offer over/under or spreads on MLS, so I'm looking for a playable play.....
If you were to place a wager on philadephia to win (not draw, or lose) what odds would you play it @? (for instance over +150, or under +190).
Thanks for your write-up. Really like the over 2.5. Very tempted to take NE +100 and LA galaxy -115 to win (not draw, or lose), but no beckham got me worried....I got burned big when LA lost @ Chivas and beckham came into the game around the 70th minute when LA was already down. My book (william hill) doesn't offer over/under or spreads on MLS, so I'm looking for a playable play.....
If you were to place a wager on philadephia to win (not draw, or lose) what odds would you play it @? (for instance over +150, or under +190).
No value taking philly pk at -140.. Bol wit your picks.
0
Quote Originally Posted by lSHOTBlGGlE:
Thanks for your write-up. Really like the over 2.5. Very tempted to take NE +100 and LA galaxy -115 to win (not draw, or lose), but no beckham got me worried....I got burned big when LA lost @ Chivas and beckham came into the game around the 70th minute when LA was already down. My book (william hill) doesn't offer over/under or spreads on MLS, so I'm looking for a playable play.....
If you were to place a wager on philadephia to win (not draw, or lose) what odds would you play it @? (for instance over +150, or under +190).
No value taking philly pk at -140.. Bol wit your picks.
Thanks for your write-up. Really like the over 2.5. Very tempted to take NE +100 and LA galaxy -115 to win (not draw, or lose), but no beckham got me worried....I got burned big when LA lost @ Chivas and beckham came into the game around the 70th minute when LA was already down. My book (william hill) doesn't offer over/under or spreads on MLS, so I'm looking for a playable play.....
If you were to place a wager on philadephia to win (not draw, or lose) what odds would you play it @? (for instance over +150, or under +190).
Saw this late, I am no expert at this kind of thing. If I can take a NTL option or pk or pk, -.5 option, I'm likely to bet that instead of a +150 on a win, just for the insurance. Bit of a chicken like that. Hope you ended up waiting and didn't put a bet in!
Galaxy with no Beckham isn't much of a difference I have to say. No doubt he's very special and does his things on set pieces but against inferior teams they can definitely get by without him (or Donovan, or Keane).
Was a tricky card this week, just happy to end up + no matter what happens in the final game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by lSHOTBlGGlE:
Thanks for your write-up. Really like the over 2.5. Very tempted to take NE +100 and LA galaxy -115 to win (not draw, or lose), but no beckham got me worried....I got burned big when LA lost @ Chivas and beckham came into the game around the 70th minute when LA was already down. My book (william hill) doesn't offer over/under or spreads on MLS, so I'm looking for a playable play.....
If you were to place a wager on philadephia to win (not draw, or lose) what odds would you play it @? (for instance over +150, or under +190).
Saw this late, I am no expert at this kind of thing. If I can take a NTL option or pk or pk, -.5 option, I'm likely to bet that instead of a +150 on a win, just for the insurance. Bit of a chicken like that. Hope you ended up waiting and didn't put a bet in!
Galaxy with no Beckham isn't much of a difference I have to say. No doubt he's very special and does his things on set pieces but against inferior teams they can definitely get by without him (or Donovan, or Keane).
Was a tricky card this week, just happy to end up + no matter what happens in the final game.
Saw this late, I am no expert at this kind of thing. If I can take a NTL option or pk or pk, -.5 option, I'm likely to bet that instead of a +150 on a win, just for the insurance. Bit of a chicken like that. Hope you ended up waiting and didn't put a bet in!
Galaxy with no Beckham isn't much of a difference I have to say. No doubt he's very special and does his things on set pieces but against inferior teams they can definitely get by without him (or Donovan, or Keane).
Was a tricky card this week, just happy to end up + no matter what happens in the final game.
Curious why the over instead of ML - I see a lot of people on the under...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Dempsey23-:
Saw this late, I am no expert at this kind of thing. If I can take a NTL option or pk or pk, -.5 option, I'm likely to bet that instead of a +150 on a win, just for the insurance. Bit of a chicken like that. Hope you ended up waiting and didn't put a bet in!
Galaxy with no Beckham isn't much of a difference I have to say. No doubt he's very special and does his things on set pieces but against inferior teams they can definitely get by without him (or Donovan, or Keane).
Was a tricky card this week, just happy to end up + no matter what happens in the final game.
Curious why the over instead of ML - I see a lot of people on the under...
it was nice to watch the game on ESPN. had a winning ticket, but pretty much covered half of my loss on another ticket.....wish jason heyward would've hit a homer @ the top of the 9th......
great call on the over. i really liked that bet myself, but only took galaxy @ -115. will be waiting to see your next post. gluck
0
it was nice to watch the game on ESPN. had a winning ticket, but pretty much covered half of my loss on another ticket.....wish jason heyward would've hit a homer @ the top of the 9th......
great call on the over. i really liked that bet myself, but only took galaxy @ -115. will be waiting to see your next post. gluck
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.