Sacks over for certain for me......these two teams ranked first and second in sacks during the regular season. Figure Ben will go down 4 times. Last time they played (2009) there were 6 sacks in the game.
Hugh....what are your thoughts on Rodgers and Jennings over. With the Pack not being able to run the ball against these guys, what else is left?
0
Sacks over for certain for me......these two teams ranked first and second in sacks during the regular season. Figure Ben will go down 4 times. Last time they played (2009) there were 6 sacks in the game.
Hugh....what are your thoughts on Rodgers and Jennings over. With the Pack not being able to run the ball against these guys, what else is left?
Hugh....what are your thoughts on Rodgers and Jennings over. With the Pack not being able to run the ball against these guys, what else is left?
The one thing I've always noticed is that if I don't have a solid read on the game, my picks are pretty much doomed to failure and, right now, I really don't have a strong opinion on this game. I do sort of like the Packers to win, but that doesn't necessarily mean it'll be on account of Rodgers and Jennings (they will have to be able to run the ball, or at least look like they're willing to); if anything, I would expect Jennings to get a lot of double coverage, meaning Donald Driver becomes the Number 1 option but, like I said, I really don't know.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Allbutbroke:
Hugh....what are your thoughts on Rodgers and Jennings over. With the Pack not being able to run the ball against these guys, what else is left?
The one thing I've always noticed is that if I don't have a solid read on the game, my picks are pretty much doomed to failure and, right now, I really don't have a strong opinion on this game. I do sort of like the Packers to win, but that doesn't necessarily mean it'll be on account of Rodgers and Jennings (they will have to be able to run the ball, or at least look like they're willing to); if anything, I would expect Jennings to get a lot of double coverage, meaning Donald Driver becomes the Number 1 option but, like I said, I really don't know.
The one thing I've always noticed is that if I don't have a solid read on the game, my picks are pretty much doomed to failure and, right now, I really don't have a strong opinion on this game. I do sort of like the Packers to win, but that doesn't necessarily mean it'll be on account of Rodgers and Jennings (they will have to be able to run the ball, or at least look like they're willing to); if anything, I would expect Jennings to get a lot of double coverage, meaning Donald Driver becomes the Number 1 option but, like I said, I really don't know.
Great points........I agree, having confidence in which side wins certainly helps determine which qbs and/or receivers are playing catchup. This one is really tough. Bordio is great capper and he is solid on the under - I definitely trust him. That said, these two matched up for 70 plus points in 2009.
This is a tough one for sure. I probably will play one ticket on sacks over, jennings over and Rodgers over but there is lots of time to figure this one out.
0
Quote Originally Posted by hugh613:
The one thing I've always noticed is that if I don't have a solid read on the game, my picks are pretty much doomed to failure and, right now, I really don't have a strong opinion on this game. I do sort of like the Packers to win, but that doesn't necessarily mean it'll be on account of Rodgers and Jennings (they will have to be able to run the ball, or at least look like they're willing to); if anything, I would expect Jennings to get a lot of double coverage, meaning Donald Driver becomes the Number 1 option but, like I said, I really don't know.
Great points........I agree, having confidence in which side wins certainly helps determine which qbs and/or receivers are playing catchup. This one is really tough. Bordio is great capper and he is solid on the under - I definitely trust him. That said, these two matched up for 70 plus points in 2009.
This is a tough one for sure. I probably will play one ticket on sacks over, jennings over and Rodgers over but there is lots of time to figure this one out.
steelers...... are going to take them to the woodshed ......going to be a blow out i see green bay scrambling maybe late touchdown field goal make it respectable and make game closer actually was.....rogers gets ton yards late
i like longest rush O 23.5 .....
0
steelers...... are going to take them to the woodshed ......going to be a blow out i see green bay scrambling maybe late touchdown field goal make it respectable and make game closer actually was.....rogers gets ton yards late
This is going to be a great game... Pitt can defend against the Packers spread passing offense, and GB will have problems stopping the run. HOWEVER, if the Steelers rookie stud centre Pouncey can't go, it gives a slight advantage to GB who have a decent front 4 of their own. Raji is a monster in the middle. Onto the props:
Rodgers OVER 24.5
Longest Pass OVER 44.5
Still feeling out the rest, but feel reel good about these.
GO PACKERS...
Packers 27
Steelers 20 F
0
This is going to be a great game... Pitt can defend against the Packers spread passing offense, and GB will have problems stopping the run. HOWEVER, if the Steelers rookie stud centre Pouncey can't go, it gives a slight advantage to GB who have a decent front 4 of their own. Raji is a monster in the middle. Onto the props:
Rodgers OVER 24.5
Longest Pass OVER 44.5
Still feeling out the rest, but feel reel good about these.
BEN ROETHLISBERGER PASS COMPLETIONS OVER 20.5 @ 1.75 *Little higher than what I would have liked, but the more I think about it, the more I expect the Packers to have a two score lead heading into the 4th quarter, which should help this out a lot. QUARTERBACK SACKS MADE OVER 5.5 @ 1.90 *With C Maurkice Pouncey out, Roethlisberger might be good for this all on his own. LONGEST PASS COMPLETION OVER 44.5 @ 1.60 *Between Mike Wallace and Greg Jennings, we should get a minimum 4 to 5 cracks at what really is a very low number considering.
Thought about Longest Field Goal Over and Fumbles Under as well but, in the end, it's usually best just to stick with your initial instincts.
5.32 X $100 = $532
Good Luck Everyone!
0
A week later, and nothing's changed...
BEN ROETHLISBERGER PASS COMPLETIONS OVER 20.5 @ 1.75 *Little higher than what I would have liked, but the more I think about it, the more I expect the Packers to have a two score lead heading into the 4th quarter, which should help this out a lot. QUARTERBACK SACKS MADE OVER 5.5 @ 1.90 *With C Maurkice Pouncey out, Roethlisberger might be good for this all on his own. LONGEST PASS COMPLETION OVER 44.5 @ 1.60 *Between Mike Wallace and Greg Jennings, we should get a minimum 4 to 5 cracks at what really is a very low number considering.
Thought about Longest Field Goal Over and Fumbles Under as well but, in the end, it's usually best just to stick with your initial instincts.
Oh well... At least I made it back on my Packers bet. Not that surprised we didn't get the longest pass (freakin' James Jones). VERY surprised we didn't get the sacks.
Good luck with hockey guys.
0
Oh well... At least I made it back on my Packers bet. Not that surprised we didn't get the longest pass (freakin' James Jones). VERY surprised we didn't get the sacks.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.