A question I can't find an answer to..

Question

I&#x27;m not sure how to even word this question..&#xA;Tonight&#x27;s game rams -3.5 at SF.&#xA;Almost always both sides of a spread is juiced at -110.. But every once in a while one side will be heavier. SF was -115. Rams were -105.&#xA;I&#x27;ve noticed the heavier side tends to cover more often than not. And it&#x27;s usually the side the public isn&#x27;t on.. Is there a way to find that out? Is there a way/site/database to look back at stuff like that? &#xA; &#xA;Thanks for any help.

Dport · Answer

I&#x27;m not sure how to even word this question..&#xA;Tonight&#x27;s game rams -3.5 at SF.&#xA;Almost always both sides of a spread is juiced at -110.. But every once in a while one side will be heavier. SF was -115. Rams were -105.&#xA;I&#x27;ve noticed the heavier side tends to cover more often than not. And it&#x27;s usually the side the public isn&#x27;t on.. Is there a way to find that out? Is there a way/site/database to look back at stuff like that? &#xA; &#xA;Thanks for any help.

Dport · Answer

I guess I&#x27;m asking does the heavier side of a spread have a higher win % historically?

sports_Network · Answer

@Dport&#xA; No...All books are different, the vig is based soley on balance...has no comparison to a historical winning % light or heavy side is irrelevant...

Surfer2 · Answer

@Dport&#xA; The public is actually on the "heavier" side.  That is why the vig went from -110 to -115.  If the public continued to back SF, the vig would raise to -120, -125, and eventually-4 (-110)

professor53 · Answer

i have noticed when live betting in my casino a 5 point dog in nfl was juiced at -130 the fav was -108 and the DOG always covered or won s/u

A question I can't find an answer to..

Hot Forum Topics