Firstly I believed Blackjack is (or was) one of the more enjoyable and favorable games for the player. However its with concern I see more and more CSMs (Continuous Shuffle Machines) being deployed and implemented at Casinos.
A couple of questions for the more refined and experienced Blackjack players:
1. Since the introduction of CSMs, what has that done to the house' edge?
2. The Basic Strategy tables we have committed to memory....are they rendered useless now because of CSMs?
3. While I can't prove this I believe CSMs have shuffling algorithms that favour the house provided the dealer collects and stacks them a particular way. Is this the case?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Firstly I believed Blackjack is (or was) one of the more enjoyable and favorable games for the player. However its with concern I see more and more CSMs (Continuous Shuffle Machines) being deployed and implemented at Casinos.
A couple of questions for the more refined and experienced Blackjack players:
1. Since the introduction of CSMs, what has that done to the house' edge?
2. The Basic Strategy tables we have committed to memory....are they rendered useless now because of CSMs?
3. While I can't prove this I believe CSMs have shuffling algorithms that favour the house provided the dealer collects and stacks them a particular way. Is this the case?
Firstly I believed Blackjack is (or was) one of the more enjoyable and favorable games for the player. However its with concern I see more and more CSMs (Continuous Shuffle Machines) being deployed and implemented at Casinos.
A couple of questions for the more refined and experienced Blackjack players:
1. Since the introduction of CSMs, what has that done to the house' edge?
2. The Basic Strategy tables we have committed to memory....are they rendered useless now because of CSMs?
3. While I can't prove this I believe CSMs have shuffling algorithms that favour the house provided the dealer collects and stacks them a particular way. Is this the case?
Yes, Blackjack along with craps are two enjoyable, and exciting table games the Casino offers.
The introduction of the CSM has increased the house odds dramatically. and has worked against the initiation process, to the excessive limits where players are totally 'shunning' the Casinos using this system, very few, to the best of my knowledge, LV /Nevada Casinos engage in this type of Blackjack play, none on the strip, or Freemont St,,simply stay away (as many have), especially if you're a serious player, CSM is far from being employed universally, it is not the 'future' in Blackjack play, it is the innovation to house favored (unnecessary) greed by changing the original game, thus giving players no alternative other than to take their action elsewhere.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Vic-Vega:
Firstly I believed Blackjack is (or was) one of the more enjoyable and favorable games for the player. However its with concern I see more and more CSMs (Continuous Shuffle Machines) being deployed and implemented at Casinos.
A couple of questions for the more refined and experienced Blackjack players:
1. Since the introduction of CSMs, what has that done to the house' edge?
2. The Basic Strategy tables we have committed to memory....are they rendered useless now because of CSMs?
3. While I can't prove this I believe CSMs have shuffling algorithms that favour the house provided the dealer collects and stacks them a particular way. Is this the case?
Yes, Blackjack along with craps are two enjoyable, and exciting table games the Casino offers.
The introduction of the CSM has increased the house odds dramatically. and has worked against the initiation process, to the excessive limits where players are totally 'shunning' the Casinos using this system, very few, to the best of my knowledge, LV /Nevada Casinos engage in this type of Blackjack play, none on the strip, or Freemont St,,simply stay away (as many have), especially if you're a serious player, CSM is far from being employed universally, it is not the 'future' in Blackjack play, it is the innovation to house favored (unnecessary) greed by changing the original game, thus giving players no alternative other than to take their action elsewhere.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
