So I’ve got something working right now that is showing good
return. It’s based on an algorithmic approach applicable to market investment
utilizing RSI and MACD indicators. By redefining the variables (the sportsbook
as a brokerage market, the betas the commodity, and bettor as the consumer
interest), there appears to be a true correlation in Moneyline prediction
within a set parameter. So far this has been successful with NBA, NCAAB, NFL,
and NCAAF, with foreseeable success in MLB/NHL (beta testing pending seasons starting).
With it being based on parametered ML betting, there is a heightened revenue
margin at 75%, but currently it has been holding firm at 91% going 20-2. I’ll
post wager selections (based on an arbitrary $100 bet) from this algorithm for
anyone interested in following it, or until it embarrasses itself to the scrap
heap of fallen betting systems…
12/21/2012 Pick: NBA: Memphis $100 at ML of (-720)
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
So I’ve got something working right now that is showing good
return. It’s based on an algorithmic approach applicable to market investment
utilizing RSI and MACD indicators. By redefining the variables (the sportsbook
as a brokerage market, the betas the commodity, and bettor as the consumer
interest), there appears to be a true correlation in Moneyline prediction
within a set parameter. So far this has been successful with NBA, NCAAB, NFL,
and NCAAF, with foreseeable success in MLB/NHL (beta testing pending seasons starting).
With it being based on parametered ML betting, there is a heightened revenue
margin at 75%, but currently it has been holding firm at 91% going 20-2. I’ll
post wager selections (based on an arbitrary $100 bet) from this algorithm for
anyone interested in following it, or until it embarrasses itself to the scrap
heap of fallen betting systems…
12/21/2012 Pick: NBA: Memphis $100 at ML of (-720)
It's a fair observation, but a bit premature given only one wager prediction. The algorithm averages a ML of around -300 in regards to wagers that fall within its parameters, representing the 75% revenue margin noted originally. I went back and forth about going live using this as the initial wager, given the high ML, but figured I might as well get the ball rolling. Give it a few picks to see if it backs up the claim...
0
It's a fair observation, but a bit premature given only one wager prediction. The algorithm averages a ML of around -300 in regards to wagers that fall within its parameters, representing the 75% revenue margin noted originally. I went back and forth about going live using this as the initial wager, given the high ML, but figured I might as well get the ball rolling. Give it a few picks to see if it backs up the claim...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.