As I've remarked before, no other sports lends itself to peaks and valleys quite like baseball. The sheer length of the season and the fact that teams will play so many consecutive days ensures that teams will have some winning streaks and some losing streaks during the season.
One of my favorites wagers is betting underdogs off a win in their previous game. While I don't bet them blindly, it's always something that I pay attention to.
There is one situation that I'll give a bit of extra consideration and that's an underdog off a straight up win as an underdog while scoring three runs or less. Here's a team who didn't have its best offensive game, yet managed to win a game it was expected to lose and is expected to come on the short end once again.
Since the 2008 season, teams in this situation are 186-204 for a profit of $5,165 for a bettor wagering $100 per play. That's not bad for such a simple system.
Last year the system was 75-79 for a profit of $2,490. It dipped a bit in 2009, going 46-57 for a profit of $685 after going 65-68 for a profit of $1,990.
The beauty of betting underdogs is that you can less than half your bets and still show a nice profit. Betting underdogs isn't for everybody, as you're prone to longer losing streaks than if you bet on favorites, but it is the way to go if you're interested in showing a profit at the end of the year.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
low scoring underdog winners by Allen Moody
As I've remarked before, no other sports lends itself to peaks and valleys quite like baseball. The sheer length of the season and the fact that teams will play so many consecutive days ensures that teams will have some winning streaks and some losing streaks during the season.
One of my favorites wagers is betting underdogs off a win in their previous game. While I don't bet them blindly, it's always something that I pay attention to.
There is one situation that I'll give a bit of extra consideration and that's an underdog off a straight up win as an underdog while scoring three runs or less. Here's a team who didn't have its best offensive game, yet managed to win a game it was expected to lose and is expected to come on the short end once again.
Since the 2008 season, teams in this situation are 186-204 for a profit of $5,165 for a bettor wagering $100 per play. That's not bad for such a simple system.
Last year the system was 75-79 for a profit of $2,490. It dipped a bit in 2009, going 46-57 for a profit of $685 after going 65-68 for a profit of $1,990.
The beauty of betting underdogs is that you can less than half your bets and still show a nice profit. Betting underdogs isn't for everybody, as you're prone to longer losing streaks than if you bet on favorites, but it is the way to go if you're interested in showing a profit at the end of the year.
For those who are following or monitoring this system, I think we all missed a play today. But, luckily we probably missed playing a loser, as the White Sox are losing to the Yankees right now by a score of 3-1 in the 7th.
The White Sox qualified as a play today since they won 3-2 last night as an underdog, and they are an underdog tonight.
I also just noticed that the White Sox were also a play (and a winner) on Tuesday night, as they beat the Yankees 2-0 as an underdog on Monday. The Monday game qualified them as a play on Tuesday when they won 3-2.
This might very well be a profitable system, and probably much better than any chase system or mystical computer program picks that a certain poster might hopelessly use.
0
For those who are following or monitoring this system, I think we all missed a play today. But, luckily we probably missed playing a loser, as the White Sox are losing to the Yankees right now by a score of 3-1 in the 7th.
The White Sox qualified as a play today since they won 3-2 last night as an underdog, and they are an underdog tonight.
I also just noticed that the White Sox were also a play (and a winner) on Tuesday night, as they beat the Yankees 2-0 as an underdog on Monday. The Monday game qualified them as a play on Tuesday when they won 3-2.
This might very well be a profitable system, and probably much better than any chase system or mystical computer program picks that a certain poster might hopelessly use.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.