Found another system that I was thinking about tracking. Not sure what forum it originally came from but the posters name was Azmat. I just saw some notes about it on the Rx. The system goes like this...
Dog of +100 to +150
No play if dog lost 3 in a row
No play if fav won 3 in a row
No play if going against top 20 ERA pitcher
The notes on said that in 2005 it was 362-388 (+43.4 units), and 2006 went 204-197(+46.4 units). Not sure if this was from flat betting or a labourchere.
Not sure how to back test this system as it would be hard to determine which pitchers were in the top 20 at the time the games were played.
Has anyone seen or used this system?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Found another system that I was thinking about tracking. Not sure what forum it originally came from but the posters name was Azmat. I just saw some notes about it on the Rx. The system goes like this...
Dog of +100 to +150
No play if dog lost 3 in a row
No play if fav won 3 in a row
No play if going against top 20 ERA pitcher
The notes on said that in 2005 it was 362-388 (+43.4 units), and 2006 went 204-197(+46.4 units). Not sure if this was from flat betting or a labourchere.
Not sure how to back test this system as it would be hard to determine which pitchers were in the top 20 at the time the games were played.
Only 1 way to see how this would work. Going to try this with the labourchere to see if it has any potential. Since I cant back test this I'm going to start out small with $10 units.
2 plays qualify today.
5-5-5-5
COL (+132) 10/13.20
WAS (+135) 10/13.50
0
Only 1 way to see how this would work. Going to try this with the labourchere to see if it has any potential. Since I cant back test this I'm going to start out small with $10 units.
interesting,lets see how it will evolve.does the dog has to be an open odds dog or a close odds dog?there are teams which open at -115 and move to +107 and the opposite.what in these cases?at least you can backtest it taking in consideration the 3 of 4 rules you are writing!!
I ve searched for a Home Dog System,take each Home Dog in a series betting at a maximum of 2 plays in the series and with odds at +100 at least.If bet A 1 U loses then bet B will be a 2 U play and you stop there the series is finished.If bet A wins you stop there and the series is done.With this way on 2008 the profit was +18.07 and on 2009 +30.92.This season so far is somewhere between -5.00--6.00 but it is still early.
0
interesting,lets see how it will evolve.does the dog has to be an open odds dog or a close odds dog?there are teams which open at -115 and move to +107 and the opposite.what in these cases?at least you can backtest it taking in consideration the 3 of 4 rules you are writing!!
I ve searched for a Home Dog System,take each Home Dog in a series betting at a maximum of 2 plays in the series and with odds at +100 at least.If bet A 1 U loses then bet B will be a 2 U play and you stop there the series is finished.If bet A wins you stop there and the series is done.With this way on 2008 the profit was +18.07 and on 2009 +30.92.This season so far is somewhere between -5.00--6.00 but it is still early.
The Baseball Underdog System is based on a law of averages showing that, over the long term, MLB underdogs beat favorites about 4 games out of 9 (or 44% of the time). Even with moneyline odds on underdogs earning you better than even money -- meaning that at +130 you lay $10 to win $13 -- you need to rack up better than a record of 4 wins and 5 losses every day to make substantial profits.
For example, let’s assume you bet $10 on each of 9 underdogs today, with each getting +130 moneyline odds. If you win 4 games, you profit $13 each or $52 total. But the $50 you lose when 5 favorites win gives you a slim $2 profit overall. So instead of simply betting on the underdogs in every game, you must weed out about two-thirds of the games by following my 3 simple criteria:
on error resume next
plugin = ( IsObject(CreateObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash.4")))
Text>is this basically the same system ??
0
The Baseball Underdog System is based on a law of averages showing that, over the long term, MLB underdogs beat favorites about 4 games out of 9 (or 44% of the time). Even with moneyline odds on underdogs earning you better than even money -- meaning that at +130 you lay $10 to win $13 -- you need to rack up better than a record of 4 wins and 5 losses every day to make substantial profits.
For example, let’s assume you bet $10 on each of 9 underdogs today, with each getting +130 moneyline odds. If you win 4 games, you profit $13 each or $52 total. But the $50 you lose when 5 favorites win gives you a slim $2 profit overall. So instead of simply betting on the underdogs in every game, you must weed out about two-thirds of the games by following my 3 simple criteria:
on error resume next
plugin = ( IsObject(CreateObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash.4")))
Text>is this basically the same system ??
Could only read the last 2 criteria, but those 2 does seem like it is the same system. Can you try to re post it? Have you played this system before and if so how did it do?
0
Could only read the last 2 criteria, but those 2 does seem like it is the same system. Can you try to re post it? Have you played this system before and if so how did it do?
I have been posting on this system since the season began first of April. You can find it here. I had to do some filters on it and they are explained in the posts. I post plays every day.
Good luck with your efforts.
0
I have been posting on this system since the season began first of April. You can find it here. I had to do some filters on it and they are explained in the posts. I post plays every day.
Found another system that I was thinking about tracking. Not sure what forum it originally came from but the posters name was Azmat. I just saw some notes about it on the Rx. The system goes like this...
Dog of +100 to +150
No play if dog lost 3 in a row
No play if fav won 3 in a row
No play if going against top 20 ERA pitcher
The notes on said that in 2005 it was 362-388 (+43.4 units), and 2006 went 204-197(+46.4 units). Not sure if this was from flat betting or a labourchere.
Not sure how to back test this system as it would be hard to determine which pitchers were in the top 20 at the time the games were played.
Has anyone seen or used this system?
Its up 17.328 units since April 17, 2010. Unless Im playing it wrong.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MCSI:
Found another system that I was thinking about tracking. Not sure what forum it originally came from but the posters name was Azmat. I just saw some notes about it on the Rx. The system goes like this...
Dog of +100 to +150
No play if dog lost 3 in a row
No play if fav won 3 in a row
No play if going against top 20 ERA pitcher
The notes on said that in 2005 it was 362-388 (+43.4 units), and 2006 went 204-197(+46.4 units). Not sure if this was from flat betting or a labourchere.
Not sure how to back test this system as it would be hard to determine which pitchers were in the top 20 at the time the games were played.
Has anyone seen or used this system?
Its up 17.328 units since April 17, 2010. Unless Im playing it wrong.
Right Angels lost 3 in a row. But KC at some books is over +150. So play at your own risk. Texas is a play because the rules did not say to not play a dog who has won 3 in a row. It says to not play against a fav who won 3 in a row.
0
Right Angels lost 3 in a row. But KC at some books is over +150. So play at your own risk. Texas is a play because the rules did not say to not play a dog who has won 3 in a row. It says to not play against a fav who won 3 in a row.
If the team you are betting against has won 3 in a row then don't take the dog. Don't worry if the dog has won 3 or whatever games in a row. It's even better because you are betting a hot team that is a dog. GL
0
If the team you are betting against has won 3 in a row then don't take the dog. Don't worry if the dog has won 3 or whatever games in a row. It's even better because you are betting a hot team that is a dog. GL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.