OTT (10/18 lost, won) (11/4 lost, lost lost) (12/14 lost won)
TOR (10/18 won) (12/17 lost lost won) (1/3 won)
CAL (10/18 won) (12/6 won)
COL (10/28 lost won) (11/18 won)(12/17 won)
EDM (10/20 lost won) (11/28 lost lost won)
MIN (10/13 won) (11/17 won)
VAN (10/18 lost, won) (11/13 won) (11/29 won) (12/19 won)
CAR (11/1 won) (11/29 lost lost lost) (12/21 lost won)
FLA (10/31 lost lost lost) (11/19 wown) (12/13 lost won) (12/27 won)
TB (10/17 lost won) (11/17 won) (12/27 won)
WAS (11/21 won) (11/29 won) (12/1 won)
WIN (11/14 won) (11/29 lost won) (12/13 won)
ANA (10/8 won) (11/9 lost won) (11/25 lost lost won) (12/29 lost lost lost)
DAL (10/10 won) (10/27 lost won) (11/19 lost won) (12/9 won) (12/29 Lost, won)
LAK (11/8 won) (11/26 lost won) (12/31 won)
PHX (10/15 won) (10/25 lost won) (11/3 lost won) (11/23 won)
SJ (11/3 won) (12/1 won) (12/15 won) (1/5 won)
As we can see (if you can understand the above) if we chased every 3+ home stand with no filters we would have been
90-5 (94%) ytd
A games 46-44 (51%)
B games 28-15 (65%)
C games 9-5 (65%)
The "A" game percentage sucks, so that is where theRizz original system comes into play.
Filter the A games with therizz:
--Wait for a NHL team to have a homestand of 3 games or more.
--If the odds for Game 1 of the homestand is -145 or higher it triggers a 3 game chase
I am also gonna play the games that didnt qualify but only in Game 2 and chase for 2 games.
I started a new thread because I dont wanna interfere with therizz or anyone who may think this is silly. The strategy is simple... home ice in the NHL does mean something. TheRizz system is undefeated this season in all its chases.
so today as with theRizz thread the play would be:
Chicago "b" game
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Anyone been following theRizz NHL system?
I have and its been good, but I was wondering how to get more games, because theRizz system provides maybe 4-5 games a month.
OTT (10/18 lost, won) (11/4 lost, lost lost) (12/14 lost won)
TOR (10/18 won) (12/17 lost lost won) (1/3 won)
CAL (10/18 won) (12/6 won)
COL (10/28 lost won) (11/18 won)(12/17 won)
EDM (10/20 lost won) (11/28 lost lost won)
MIN (10/13 won) (11/17 won)
VAN (10/18 lost, won) (11/13 won) (11/29 won) (12/19 won)
CAR (11/1 won) (11/29 lost lost lost) (12/21 lost won)
FLA (10/31 lost lost lost) (11/19 wown) (12/13 lost won) (12/27 won)
TB (10/17 lost won) (11/17 won) (12/27 won)
WAS (11/21 won) (11/29 won) (12/1 won)
WIN (11/14 won) (11/29 lost won) (12/13 won)
ANA (10/8 won) (11/9 lost won) (11/25 lost lost won) (12/29 lost lost lost)
DAL (10/10 won) (10/27 lost won) (11/19 lost won) (12/9 won) (12/29 Lost, won)
LAK (11/8 won) (11/26 lost won) (12/31 won)
PHX (10/15 won) (10/25 lost won) (11/3 lost won) (11/23 won)
SJ (11/3 won) (12/1 won) (12/15 won) (1/5 won)
As we can see (if you can understand the above) if we chased every 3+ home stand with no filters we would have been
90-5 (94%) ytd
A games 46-44 (51%)
B games 28-15 (65%)
C games 9-5 (65%)
The "A" game percentage sucks, so that is where theRizz original system comes into play.
Filter the A games with therizz:
--Wait for a NHL team to have a homestand of 3 games or more.
--If the odds for Game 1 of the homestand is -145 or higher it triggers a 3 game chase
I am also gonna play the games that didnt qualify but only in Game 2 and chase for 2 games.
I started a new thread because I dont wanna interfere with therizz or anyone who may think this is silly. The strategy is simple... home ice in the NHL does mean something. TheRizz system is undefeated this season in all its chases.
so today as with theRizz thread the play would be:
pending Pitt game "B" tomorrow (series started 1/6 it didnt qualify for RIZZ and lost game 1. begin chase for game 2, and game 3. it lost game 2, so play would be to play them big for game 3)
FLORIDA, if they lose tonight we will play them in game 2 if they win no chase.
0
January Series
1/1 NAS
1/2 PHI DNQ (lost)
1/3 TOR DNQ(won), STL
1/4 MON DNQ (won)
1/5 BOS (modified PHI game 2 WON)
1/6 PITT DNQ - lost, CHI lost
1/7 CAL DNQ - won (modified PIT game 2 lost)
1/8 CHI game B lost
1/9 FLA DNQ
1/10 NYI
1/11 WAS, EDM
1/12 DET, STL
1/13 CLB
1/14 TOR, MON
1/15 CHI, VAN
1/17 NJ
1/18 ANA
1/19 LAK, PHX
1/24 TB, FLA, CAL
ALL STAR BREAK WEEKEND
1/31 BOS, PHI
Month to date:
Rizz series 2-0
pending CHICAGO game "C" tomorrow
Modified Rizz series 3-0
pending Chicago game "C" tomorrow
pending Pitt game "B" tomorrow (series started 1/6 it didnt qualify for RIZZ and lost game 1. begin chase for game 2, and game 3. it lost game 2, so play would be to play them big for game 3)
FLORIDA, if they lose tonight we will play them in game 2 if they win no chase.
Yes, good work. I don't know how many plays this would filter out, but if you just used a filter like: first game home team can't be an outright underdog or home team in say bottom 5 RPI, that would have filtered out 3 of the losses, leaving only MTL and FLO. I know I haven't been posting as often as I'd like in therizz's thread. I'm going to try to keep up with it better, although it really helps when other people post as well.
0
Yes, good work. I don't know how many plays this would filter out, but if you just used a filter like: first game home team can't be an outright underdog or home team in say bottom 5 RPI, that would have filtered out 3 of the losses, leaving only MTL and FLO. I know I haven't been posting as often as I'd like in therizz's thread. I'm going to try to keep up with it better, although it really helps when other people post as well.
You ever realize a trend and then post it and it SUCKS!!!
Pitt down 3-0 in second period to Ottawa.
Chicago pending.
Skew8... yeah... I just went through every team homestands and counted them up. The end result was about 60% which still is money. the 90-5 is misleading when you account for a 40% loss throughout the year.
0
You ever realize a trend and then post it and it SUCKS!!!
Pitt down 3-0 in second period to Ottawa.
Chicago pending.
Skew8... yeah... I just went through every team homestands and counted them up. The end result was about 60% which still is money. the 90-5 is misleading when you account for a 40% loss throughout the year.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.