I am currently on the lookout for NBA Systems to play for this coming season. Anybody have any recomendations? I've been seeing a lot of posts trying to sell the NBA World's Greatest System. Usually you can find what the system consists of without buying it? But I have had no luck. Anyone have any info on this system?
Thanks, Dave
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I am currently on the lookout for NBA Systems to play for this coming season. Anybody have any recomendations? I've been seeing a lot of posts trying to sell the NBA World's Greatest System. Usually you can find what the system consists of without buying it? But I have had no luck. Anyone have any info on this system?
the one i use is PLAY the over when a team is on a 3 games in 4 days road trip.. tired legs produce high scoring games i also use it for NHL ... make sure the team is on the road ...
0
the one i use is PLAY the over when a team is on a 3 games in 4 days road trip.. tired legs produce high scoring games i also use it for NHL ... make sure the team is on the road ...
the one i use is PLAY the over when a team is on a 3 games in 4 days road trip.. tired legs produce high scoring games i also use it for NHL ... make sure the team is on the road ...
Nice--How did this system perform in '09-'10?
0
Quote Originally Posted by homeslice1:
the one i use is PLAY the over when a team is on a 3 games in 4 days road trip.. tired legs produce high scoring games i also use it for NHL ... make sure the team is on the road ...
i ran a couple tests with rizz last year at the end ... we focused on betting a three game chase of over or under (the opppsite) after a team has already hit three unders or three overs in a row .. look bak in the threads ... it made huge profit
0
i ran a couple tests with rizz last year at the end ... we focused on betting a three game chase of over or under (the opppsite) after a team has already hit three unders or three overs in a row .. look bak in the threads ... it made huge profit
I have an NBA system that could be worth exploring for you. The only downfall is that the system criteria leaves usually only 15-20 games to bet on.
The system record is 27-2 going back to 2006. Both losses actually happened in 2006 and that is because they happened in a year when the system should have actually been avoided. I will explain that later.
Here it is: Bet against teams that lose SU to the defending NBA champ by 9 pts or less and playing next game away. The bets are ATS. The most consecutive wins(but we are betting on losses) this combo produced from '07-'10 is 3. I use the martingale progression in my unit allocation - 1,3,7,15.
For example,if the first game results in a win, bet 3 units on the next game that fits the system. If that game is a win, bet 7. The system wins when that combo produces a loss against the spread.
The drawbacks: you need a high bankroll and you can sometimes go 3-4 weeks between bets, based on the system requiring such unique criteria.
The system is optimal when the defending NBA champ is West Coast because teams often have to face LA, Phoenix and UTAH on west coast swings -- all great teams at home.
In 2006-07, the reigning champ was Miami. Many teams on the southeast swing play Orlando right after Miami and Orlando was very sub-par that season. Atlanta was not so hot either. It would have been a good year to skip the system.
Anyway - that's what I got.
0
Dave and Others:
I have an NBA system that could be worth exploring for you. The only downfall is that the system criteria leaves usually only 15-20 games to bet on.
The system record is 27-2 going back to 2006. Both losses actually happened in 2006 and that is because they happened in a year when the system should have actually been avoided. I will explain that later.
Here it is: Bet against teams that lose SU to the defending NBA champ by 9 pts or less and playing next game away. The bets are ATS. The most consecutive wins(but we are betting on losses) this combo produced from '07-'10 is 3. I use the martingale progression in my unit allocation - 1,3,7,15.
For example,if the first game results in a win, bet 3 units on the next game that fits the system. If that game is a win, bet 7. The system wins when that combo produces a loss against the spread.
The drawbacks: you need a high bankroll and you can sometimes go 3-4 weeks between bets, based on the system requiring such unique criteria.
The system is optimal when the defending NBA champ is West Coast because teams often have to face LA, Phoenix and UTAH on west coast swings -- all great teams at home.
In 2006-07, the reigning champ was Miami. Many teams on the southeast swing play Orlando right after Miami and Orlando was very sub-par that season. Atlanta was not so hot either. It would have been a good year to skip the system.
I have an NBA system that could be worth exploring for you. The only downfall is that the system criteria leaves usually only 15-20 games to bet on.
The system record is 27-2 going back to 2006. Both losses actually happened in 2006 and that is because they happened in a year when the system should have actually been avoided. I will explain that later.
Here it is: Bet against teams that lose SU to the defending NBA champ by 9 pts or less and playing next game away. The bets are ATS. The most consecutive wins(but we are betting on losses) this combo produced from '07-'10 is 3. I use the martingale progression in my unit allocation - 1,3,7,15.
For example,if the first game results in a win, bet 3 units on the next game that fits the system. If that game is a win, bet 7. The system wins when that combo produces a loss against the spread.
The drawbacks: you need a high bankroll and you can sometimes go 3-4 weeks between bets, based on the system requiring such unique criteria.
The system is optimal when the defending NBA champ is West Coast because teams often have to face LA, Phoenix and UTAH on west coast swings -- all great teams at home.
In 2006-07, the reigning champ was Miami. Many teams on the southeast swing play Orlando right after Miami and Orlando was very sub-par that season. Atlanta was not so hot either. It would have been a good year to skip the system.
Anyway - that's what I got.
sounds like an aggressive labby line would work well.
0
Quote Originally Posted by toft33:
Dave and Others:
I have an NBA system that could be worth exploring for you. The only downfall is that the system criteria leaves usually only 15-20 games to bet on.
The system record is 27-2 going back to 2006. Both losses actually happened in 2006 and that is because they happened in a year when the system should have actually been avoided. I will explain that later.
Here it is: Bet against teams that lose SU to the defending NBA champ by 9 pts or less and playing next game away. The bets are ATS. The most consecutive wins(but we are betting on losses) this combo produced from '07-'10 is 3. I use the martingale progression in my unit allocation - 1,3,7,15.
For example,if the first game results in a win, bet 3 units on the next game that fits the system. If that game is a win, bet 7. The system wins when that combo produces a loss against the spread.
The drawbacks: you need a high bankroll and you can sometimes go 3-4 weeks between bets, based on the system requiring such unique criteria.
The system is optimal when the defending NBA champ is West Coast because teams often have to face LA, Phoenix and UTAH on west coast swings -- all great teams at home.
In 2006-07, the reigning champ was Miami. Many teams on the southeast swing play Orlando right after Miami and Orlando was very sub-par that season. Atlanta was not so hot either. It would have been a good year to skip the system.
Anyway - that's what I got.
sounds like an aggressive labby line would work well.
Play against a home team returning after a 3 or more game roadie. The home game must be played within 2 days of the last road game. This has been a good play for a number of years.
Also, consider playing on a team that loses a game by 15 or more points over the spread on a chase.
GL
0
Play against a home team returning after a 3 or more game roadie. The home game must be played within 2 days of the last road game. This has been a good play for a number of years.
Also, consider playing on a team that loses a game by 15 or more points over the spread on a chase.
sounds like an aggressive labby line would work well.
I've seen references to labby lines all over the boards and while I'm what I would consider a sportsbetting veteran, I have no clue what a labby line and frankly - I've been too embarrassed to admit it.
do you know any good sources I can turn to learn labby lines?
0
Quote Originally Posted by jv040:
sounds like an aggressive labby line would work well.
I've seen references to labby lines all over the boards and while I'm what I would consider a sportsbetting veteran, I have no clue what a labby line and frankly - I've been too embarrassed to admit it.
do you know any good sources I can turn to learn labby lines?
Thanks guys, I will take all these into consideration. Unfortunately my book only allows you to buy up to 2 points. The JM 4 game chase is 3 points, correct?
0
Thanks guys, I will take all these into consideration. Unfortunately my book only allows you to buy up to 2 points. The JM 4 game chase is 3 points, correct?
Here's a system that I used back in year 2003. Although I didn't keep good records, I do remember I went something like 17-9 using it.
Basically, I bet the over on the halftime line if...
1. the halftime total is half or less than half of game total; and 2. there were 22 or more fouls in the first half; and 3. neither teams leading scorer had more than 2 fouls.
For example: Let's say the game line on the Lakers v. Suns was... Lakers 200 Suns 4
Kobe was 2 fouls and Nash has 2 fouls, I'm on the over.
My logic was, if the refs were calling foul calling mood and the leading scorers were still in the game, lets get on board with that.
I was l was out of work for a while back in 2003 when I played this system and after I got back to work I just kind of naturally went back to my normal 9-5 grind. I'm hoping somebody will actually track this bet during the season, if so, PLEASE send me private message and let me know the results!!!
Why did I choose 22 for the fouls? Kinda trial and error from looking at the halftime stats for other games. I have the feeling this angle would be more effective if one team was at the trail end of a 3 games in 5 night stretch were they were get even more "grabby" and thus allow for even more free throws.
0
Here's a system that I used back in year 2003. Although I didn't keep good records, I do remember I went something like 17-9 using it.
Basically, I bet the over on the halftime line if...
1. the halftime total is half or less than half of game total; and 2. there were 22 or more fouls in the first half; and 3. neither teams leading scorer had more than 2 fouls.
For example: Let's say the game line on the Lakers v. Suns was... Lakers 200 Suns 4
Kobe was 2 fouls and Nash has 2 fouls, I'm on the over.
My logic was, if the refs were calling foul calling mood and the leading scorers were still in the game, lets get on board with that.
I was l was out of work for a while back in 2003 when I played this system and after I got back to work I just kind of naturally went back to my normal 9-5 grind. I'm hoping somebody will actually track this bet during the season, if so, PLEASE send me private message and let me know the results!!!
Why did I choose 22 for the fouls? Kinda trial and error from looking at the halftime stats for other games. I have the feeling this angle would be more effective if one team was at the trail end of a 3 games in 5 night stretch were they were get even more "grabby" and thus allow for even more free throws.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
