Hmmm........ Sounds familiar - Good stuff man I will try and back tack last years results including OT losses to be conservative If the magic # of 35 doesn't provide profitable results then I would wonder how we could adjust the qualifying # to achieve optimum results
Also I am looking into chasing the biggest dog on the +1.5 / PL labouchere style. Somebody else did some back testing and the #'s look alright whether a 3 or 6 gm chase was used And those other systems I found too I will try and track Elsewhere there is a thread on taking overs with dogs getting +190 or above. It was at +200 but they dropped it down. No chasing but somebody did suggest it. Pretty successful last year going 41-20-1 starting in Dec I think
0
Hmmm........ Sounds familiar - Good stuff man I will try and back tack last years results including OT losses to be conservative If the magic # of 35 doesn't provide profitable results then I would wonder how we could adjust the qualifying # to achieve optimum results
Also I am looking into chasing the biggest dog on the +1.5 / PL labouchere style. Somebody else did some back testing and the #'s look alright whether a 3 or 6 gm chase was used And those other systems I found too I will try and track Elsewhere there is a thread on taking overs with dogs getting +190 or above. It was at +200 but they dropped it down. No chasing but somebody did suggest it. Pretty successful last year going 41-20-1 starting in Dec I think
So far I messed around with only a several games from Jan of last year as a basis with about 30 games in Tight home and road records Mixed results Thinking of utilizing JM's tactic of the RPI filter in a way I mean is to use a number instead of .35 but rather like .10 or so But again nothing concrete here Just ideas and not enough time to test out Where's a computer geek when I need one to back test all this junk
JV............
I am still working on others
0
So far I messed around with only a several games from Jan of last year as a basis with about 30 games in Tight home and road records Mixed results Thinking of utilizing JM's tactic of the RPI filter in a way I mean is to use a number instead of .35 but rather like .10 or so But again nothing concrete here Just ideas and not enough time to test out Where's a computer geek when I need one to back test all this junk
So far I messed around with only a several games from Jan of last year as a basis with about 30 games in Tight home and road records Mixed results Thinking of utilizing JM's tactic of the RPI filter in a way I mean is to use a number instead of .35 but rather like .10 or so But again nothing concrete here Just ideas and not enough time to test out Where's a computer geek when I need one to back test all this junk
JV............
I am still working on others
I thought .35 might be too high for hockey. but then again even if only a handful of plays work out it might be worth it if theres a high percentage of wins.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MontanaMax:
So far I messed around with only a several games from Jan of last year as a basis with about 30 games in Tight home and road records Mixed results Thinking of utilizing JM's tactic of the RPI filter in a way I mean is to use a number instead of .35 but rather like .10 or so But again nothing concrete here Just ideas and not enough time to test out Where's a computer geek when I need one to back test all this junk
JV............
I am still working on others
I thought .35 might be too high for hockey. but then again even if only a handful of plays work out it might be worth it if theres a high percentage of wins.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.