Arizona -1.5 b
White Sox a
Phillies b
Mets -1.5 a
Pirates c
Twins -1.5 b
Colorado -1.5 a
seattle -1.5 c
Giants -1.5 a
This is a rather confusing system as it al depends on the time you look at the lines.
But my question to improve this system is: Wouldn't it be better to only take home favs of -105 - -140 at -1,5 as it's maybe easier to win at home than away. And take the dogs home and away as they only need to win by 1. Any toughts??
yes this
does not matter because we were on oakland last night. the only way we would pass on giants today would be if giants were -1.5 last night and covered
does not matter because we were on oakland last night. the only way we would pass on giants today would be if giants were -1.5 last night and covered
I thought part of the exclusion criteria were to not play on a team that had already covered the RL in their current series???? I posted stats in a different thread based on a RL system the odds of covering the RL depending on the over/under for the game. The odds of covering RL increases with higher o/u set for the game. I think it is in MCSI's thread.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
