I was wondering if I could spot play these.... Going to track it for a few days. I get these as plays today for an A game. Bos under TB under SJ under Ottawa under
0
I was wondering if I could spot play these.... Going to track it for a few days. I get these as plays today for an A game. Bos under TB under SJ under Ottawa under
I back-tested 10 years of it. It failed all thru late 1990"s and early 2000."
Jeff_Kent says, "I doubt it."
The system may be a failure, but I don't think bigkeith backtested it for 10 years. I have seen the amount of work done by other posters on this forum back-testing, and it is a long, arduous, tedious task. Not only does bigkeith claim to have back-tested this system for 10 years, but he has claimed to have back-tested several others as well. I don't think somebody would do that without posting results. I don't see the results. The underlying claim--that the system is a loser--may very well be true. I just don't think bigkeith actually back-tested as he claims.
0
bigkeith says, "
I back-tested 10 years of it. It failed all thru late 1990"s and early 2000."
Jeff_Kent says, "I doubt it."
The system may be a failure, but I don't think bigkeith backtested it for 10 years. I have seen the amount of work done by other posters on this forum back-testing, and it is a long, arduous, tedious task. Not only does bigkeith claim to have back-tested this system for 10 years, but he has claimed to have back-tested several others as well. I don't think somebody would do that without posting results. I don't see the results. The underlying claim--that the system is a loser--may very well be true. I just don't think bigkeith actually back-tested as he claims.
If there were only 18 C games and 13 faults, it seems like you should just bet the A and B lines on this system using a Labby and you could make a ton of units. Eliminating the C line won't cost you too many wins and will eliminate most of the costly faults.
Sport, Are you playing all 3 lines?
JKent....I am with you.... While this system may not be as well tested as Kong's JM thread, I seriously doubt bigkeith backtested 10 years of it in the 24 hours after OSport posted this thread. I don't doubt that these have all been tried before. But if you had a winning system, Would YOU want it in the hands of every nickel and dime bettor surfing the net??? Exactly!
0
If there were only 18 C games and 13 faults, it seems like you should just bet the A and B lines on this system using a Labby and you could make a ton of units. Eliminating the C line won't cost you too many wins and will eliminate most of the costly faults.
Sport, Are you playing all 3 lines?
JKent....I am with you.... While this system may not be as well tested as Kong's JM thread, I seriously doubt bigkeith backtested 10 years of it in the 24 hours after OSport posted this thread. I don't doubt that these have all been tried before. But if you had a winning system, Would YOU want it in the hands of every nickel and dime bettor surfing the net??? Exactly!
I back-tested 10 years of it. It failed all thru late 1990"s and early 2000."
Jeff_Kent says, "I doubt it."
The system may be a failure, but I don't think bigkeith backtested it for 10 years. I have seen the amount of work done by other posters on this forum back-testing, and it is a long, arduous, tedious task. Not only does bigkeith claim to have back-tested this system for 10 years, but he has claimed to have back-tested several others as well. I don't think somebody would do that without posting results. I don't see the results. The underlying claim--that the system is a loser--may very well be true. I just don't think bigkeith actually back-tested as he claims.
Makes sense after all trust is most important between us here Questions develop to why the x's and o's of results are not shared to provide credibility with a statement Something to hide??????? Attention seeker???????? We'll just have to find out the hard way That's all......... Common sense....... Respect is earned and not given over time with our posts I write checks my ass can cash - how 'bout ya'll????????
If a tree falls in the woods and no body hear's it Does it fall????????? How can that be back tested?
Kieth we are open to your work that's all - its only fair to back up your claims Otherwise you lose credibility and nobody except for maybe degenerates and newbies who won't see these 2 posts will respect you
We're on the same page - are you? If so - prove it with your claims and all is good Me....... I don't have time to do the work maybe others do
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jeff_Kent:
bigkeith says, "
I back-tested 10 years of it. It failed all thru late 1990"s and early 2000."
Jeff_Kent says, "I doubt it."
The system may be a failure, but I don't think bigkeith backtested it for 10 years. I have seen the amount of work done by other posters on this forum back-testing, and it is a long, arduous, tedious task. Not only does bigkeith claim to have back-tested this system for 10 years, but he has claimed to have back-tested several others as well. I don't think somebody would do that without posting results. I don't see the results. The underlying claim--that the system is a loser--may very well be true. I just don't think bigkeith actually back-tested as he claims.
Makes sense after all trust is most important between us here Questions develop to why the x's and o's of results are not shared to provide credibility with a statement Something to hide??????? Attention seeker???????? We'll just have to find out the hard way That's all......... Common sense....... Respect is earned and not given over time with our posts I write checks my ass can cash - how 'bout ya'll????????
If a tree falls in the woods and no body hear's it Does it fall????????? How can that be back tested?
Kieth we are open to your work that's all - its only fair to back up your claims Otherwise you lose credibility and nobody except for maybe degenerates and newbies who won't see these 2 posts will respect you
We're on the same page - are you? If so - prove it with your claims and all is good Me....... I don't have time to do the work maybe others do
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
