What happenens if you lose a 3 gamer series chase. Such as lose the "A" bet, B" and also lose the "C" bet. Now since you lost this chase series do you adjust your money back to what you originally had at the beginning of your bets. Or do you keep betting with these much higher amount of bets(because you lost the AB&C bet)
i.e. Lets say I started with 50-50-50-50 and after I lost the A,B,&C bet Im now at 50-50-50-250.
Do I start my next bet at 50-50-50-50 or 50-50-50-250?
I'd really appreciate any help. thanks.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
What happenens if you lose a 3 gamer series chase. Such as lose the "A" bet, B" and also lose the "C" bet. Now since you lost this chase series do you adjust your money back to what you originally had at the beginning of your bets. Or do you keep betting with these much higher amount of bets(because you lost the AB&C bet)
i.e. Lets say I started with 50-50-50-50 and after I lost the A,B,&C bet Im now at 50-50-50-250.
Do I start my next bet at 50-50-50-50 or 50-50-50-250?
I 've always seen it a little different when researching labour. It uses 3 lines per series.
So you would have a game 1 at 50-50-50-50
game 2 at 50-50-50-50
and game 3 line at 50-50-50-50.
After losing game A, your 1st line would then be 50-50-50-50-100.
On your next bet, game B, you would have a 50-50-50-50.
After losing that, your game 2 line would be 50-50-50-50-100.
On your game C bet, you would have 50-50-50-50.
After losing that, your game 3 line would be 50-50-50-50-100.
Series is now over. On the beginning of your next series, your A game is now 50-50-50-50-100. So you are now betting to win 150 on the 1st game. If it wins you erase the 50 on the front of the line, and the 100 on the end, leaving 50-50-50 for your game A line.
On the next series you now have 50-50-50, and would bet 100.
Is this better than doing just one line? Who does just 1 line per series vs. doing 3 lines per series?
0
I 've always seen it a little different when researching labour. It uses 3 lines per series.
So you would have a game 1 at 50-50-50-50
game 2 at 50-50-50-50
and game 3 line at 50-50-50-50.
After losing game A, your 1st line would then be 50-50-50-50-100.
On your next bet, game B, you would have a 50-50-50-50.
After losing that, your game 2 line would be 50-50-50-50-100.
On your game C bet, you would have 50-50-50-50.
After losing that, your game 3 line would be 50-50-50-50-100.
Series is now over. On the beginning of your next series, your A game is now 50-50-50-50-100. So you are now betting to win 150 on the 1st game. If it wins you erase the 50 on the front of the line, and the 100 on the end, leaving 50-50-50 for your game A line.
On the next series you now have 50-50-50, and would bet 100.
Is this better than doing just one line? Who does just 1 line per series vs. doing 3 lines per series?
I 've always seen it a little different when researching labour. It uses 3 lines per series.
So you would have a game 1 at 50-50-50-50
game 2 at 50-50-50-50
and game 3 line at 50-50-50-50.
After losing game A, your 1st line would then be 50-50-50-50-100.
On your next bet, game B, you would have a 50-50-50-50.
After losing that, your game 2 line would be 50-50-50-50-100.
On your game C bet, you would have 50-50-50-50.
After losing that, your game 3 line would be 50-50-50-50-100.
Series is now over. On the beginning of your next series, your A game is now 50-50-50-50-100. So you are now betting to win 150 on the 1st game. If it wins you erase the 50 on the front of the line, and the 100 on the end, leaving 50-50-50 for your game A line.
On the next series you now have 50-50-50, and would bet 100.
Is this better than doing just one line? Who does just 1 line per series vs. doing 3 lines per series?
If you are going to do it this way, you might as well make your C line something like 25-25-25-25. Most times we never get to the C bets, so it will take longer to clear. The other point is this, lots of C games end up losing from what I have seen in NBA and especially the ongoing NCAAF research I am doing. That's just a suggestion. If clearing "C" lines is important, then I may suggest using a shorter line, like 25-25-25 or 25-25. Just a thought!
0
Quote Originally Posted by nolemonasses:
I 've always seen it a little different when researching labour. It uses 3 lines per series.
So you would have a game 1 at 50-50-50-50
game 2 at 50-50-50-50
and game 3 line at 50-50-50-50.
After losing game A, your 1st line would then be 50-50-50-50-100.
On your next bet, game B, you would have a 50-50-50-50.
After losing that, your game 2 line would be 50-50-50-50-100.
On your game C bet, you would have 50-50-50-50.
After losing that, your game 3 line would be 50-50-50-50-100.
Series is now over. On the beginning of your next series, your A game is now 50-50-50-50-100. So you are now betting to win 150 on the 1st game. If it wins you erase the 50 on the front of the line, and the 100 on the end, leaving 50-50-50 for your game A line.
On the next series you now have 50-50-50, and would bet 100.
Is this better than doing just one line? Who does just 1 line per series vs. doing 3 lines per series?
If you are going to do it this way, you might as well make your C line something like 25-25-25-25. Most times we never get to the C bets, so it will take longer to clear. The other point is this, lots of C games end up losing from what I have seen in NBA and especially the ongoing NCAAF research I am doing. That's just a suggestion. If clearing "C" lines is important, then I may suggest using a shorter line, like 25-25-25 or 25-25. Just a thought!
One could also have three different chases going on simultaneously. So one chase, let's call the games 1A, 1B, 1C can utilize line 1, the second chase can utilize line 2, etc.
So you would have
Series 1: 50-50-50-50 Series 2: 50-50-50-50 Series 3: 50-50-50-50
Let's say tonight's Phillies/Pirates is a series and Nats/Cubs is a series and tomorrow's WNBA's Atlanta is a series.
Each series can have it's own line.
You will bet 100 on the Phillies tonight, using line 1. You will bet 100 on the Cubbies tonight, using line 2. You can bet 100 on the Atlanta WNBA tomorrow, using line 3.
If the Phillies win, Cubbies lose, and Atlanta lose, then your lines can look like this:
Series 1: 50-50
Series 2: 50-50-50-50-100(+that high juice)
Series 3: 50-50-50-50-100
Or you can also distribute that high Cubbies juice amongst the other two lines, like so...
Series 1: 50-50+(juice/3)
Series 2: 50-50-50-50-100+(juice/3)
Series 3: 50-50-50-50-100+(juice/3)
I'm not sure if there is an advantage one way or the other. Also, your original suggestion above is good because it protects you against a three-game series loss by playing multiple lines.
0
One could also have three different chases going on simultaneously. So one chase, let's call the games 1A, 1B, 1C can utilize line 1, the second chase can utilize line 2, etc.
So you would have
Series 1: 50-50-50-50 Series 2: 50-50-50-50 Series 3: 50-50-50-50
Let's say tonight's Phillies/Pirates is a series and Nats/Cubs is a series and tomorrow's WNBA's Atlanta is a series.
Each series can have it's own line.
You will bet 100 on the Phillies tonight, using line 1. You will bet 100 on the Cubbies tonight, using line 2. You can bet 100 on the Atlanta WNBA tomorrow, using line 3.
If the Phillies win, Cubbies lose, and Atlanta lose, then your lines can look like this:
Series 1: 50-50
Series 2: 50-50-50-50-100(+that high juice)
Series 3: 50-50-50-50-100
Or you can also distribute that high Cubbies juice amongst the other two lines, like so...
Series 1: 50-50+(juice/3)
Series 2: 50-50-50-50-100+(juice/3)
Series 3: 50-50-50-50-100+(juice/3)
I'm not sure if there is an advantage one way or the other. Also, your original suggestion above is good because it protects you against a three-game series loss by playing multiple lines.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
