All Forums | Systems & Strategies

Run Line Blitz System

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 49071
Posts: 492
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 200
Posted: #476
no, I mean you take LAA -1.5 @ -110 and then you take OAK -1.5 @ +230. The actual alternative runlines aren't out yet on my sites, but I would imagine that the biggest underdog of the day would be pretty close to +200 or higher to win by 2.

Since over 75% of these games are won either by the favorite or the dog by 2 runs or more then if you started your chase at 2 units for the favorite and hedged it with one unit on the underdog...then if the underdog wins to will win back your 2 unit bet on the favorite and maybe even net a profit. Then you can go back to betting 2 units on the second game.

If the favorite wins then you win the 2 units...lose the one unit on the underdog and you still net one unit. 




 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 200
Posted: #477
reverse runlines just came out and Oak -1.5 is +290. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 576
Posted: #478
Current Record 88-1

9-26-09
LAA (Game 6)

Good Luck
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 473
Posted: #479
Prof8t........ Great stuff with the thread - been with ya all season
I ended up reversing your plays and taking the +1.5 / RL with some success over the last month or so based off the fact that I see it as the best matchup doesn't get the largest ML. I just couldn't stomach those larger lines and losing more games more often.

Also something to look into. I have been killing it taking the largest -1.5 / RL of the day with usually gauging it by the smallest ML

At those odds of min of -1.5 / +160 and up (usually around -1.5 / +170 to +190) you might want to look into that for next year. And it hits too at a good clip combine with a modified chase method

Also I will gauge NHL - I will see what's cooking with similar parameters and take it from there

GL...........
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 44
Posted: #480
You have to be a complete idiot to double up 6 times. LOL
63 units to win 1???? Dumbest thing I have ever seen.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 576
Posted: #481
Quote Originally Posted by scotty4luck:

You have to be a complete idiot to double up 6 times. LOL
63 units to win 1???? Dumbest thing I have ever seen.

Coming into someone else's thread and making a non-contributing negative statement without reading the entire thread is the dumbest thing I have ever seen.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 576
Posted: #482
Well, not the way I wanted to end the season.  I had actually considered stopping back around 85 wins.  Next year, I won't play this as far into September as I have this year.  Thanks to all who tuned in this year and good luck in your gambling ventures for the rest of the year.  I'll see you all back here next year.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 423
Posted: #483
excellent work prof8t and I just want to say thank you for running this thread...what a great system! look forward to following along next season.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 289
Posted: #484
Quote Originally Posted by stickbit:

excellent work prof8t and I just want to say thank you for running this thread...what a great system! look forward to following along next season.

Profit, thanks for tracking all season.  Everyone appreciates the record keeping, however it is definitely worth noting that the system was a failure at 88-2.  Anyone playing this system in its pure form lost terribly.  To call it a "great system" doesn't really make any sense.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 423
Posted: #485
Actually it makes sense...sorry I should clarify. I use the lab system for money mgmt. (not the double up bullshit), and I stop playing bases on 8/31. Cheers!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 576
Posted: #486
Using the lab system the system was not a failure.  I decided after 8/31 to cut down my wager amounts even though I kept posting the system.  I was skeptical as to whether or not to continue the system after 85 wins, however, after looking at the tight pennant races, figured we could squeeze in a few more.  Next year I will not do that.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 26212
Posted: #487
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 473
Posted: #488


Prof8t.........
Thanks for the thread
You might want to look into the +1.5 / RL for late in the year
With the odds and stuff I have been fading and tag-teaming up with vegas. Maybe even doing half units on the ML for the dog too. Research will help that statement. But at least the +1.5 / RL has been $$$$$$$$$$$$ since around mid August or so

Also killing it is the largest -1.5 / RL of the day usually around +150 to +190 combined with the smallest favorite. It does sway so I have been using judgment or just the largest RL because it always doesn't match up

I hate to admit it but my main MM has been the martingale
Otherwise based off of my gut I will go light just in case and then recoup later labouchere style

At those odds..............
You'll be safe no matter how you chase
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 473
Posted: #489
Besides watching a shitload of games because a big fan............
I will gauge these sytems too in the NHL to see what's up
Don't have time to back test though if anyone else can

My opinion lines to look for:
playing the largest fav on the -1.5 / PL
playing the largest dog on the +1.5 / PL
playing the largest -1.5 / PL

All to chase
How is up to us

Just saying..........
Anyway......... Let's get'em guys...........
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 18
Posted: #490
Anyone think about this runline blitz for NHL? Course it would be called puck line lol.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 423
Posted: #491
interesting Chief! What do you guys think? 6 game puckline chase on the biggest fav? I'll check out when i have time.
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 26212
Posted: #492
absolutely not....there is 10x more fav in NHL loosing then in MLB...
Pens just blew it today 3-0...i mean wtf...

All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.