Has anyone this system yet? And if so can you break it down for me? I understand it deals with line movements but need a better understanding on when to jump on a line(timing)........
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Has anyone this system yet? And if so can you break it down for me? I understand it deals with line movements but need a better understanding on when to jump on a line(timing)........
Has nothing to do with line movements. The system is basically targeting specific high chalk plays with an average line of between -170 & -220. It only makes sense that you'll win a high percentage of these plays. Don't need a "system" figure that one out. Save your money.
0
Has nothing to do with line movements. The system is basically targeting specific high chalk plays with an average line of between -170 & -220. It only makes sense that you'll win a high percentage of these plays. Don't need a "system" figure that one out. Save your money.
Thank you, using this method would you blindly bet all events between -170 and -215 or does some capping still need to be done here? Any additional info would be helpful, you did mention that Specific Targeted high chalk plays were involved, how are they determined? Thnx.....
0
Thank you, using this method would you blindly bet all events between -170 and -215 or does some capping still need to be done here? Any additional info would be helpful, you did mention that Specific Targeted high chalk plays were involved, how are they determined? Thnx.....
it takes the biggest difference between the underdog and the favorite when you subtract the odds. I did notice the author claims a 91% winning percentage, but I think he was smoking some really good stuff when he came up with that. However, the system as I've seen can pull off some decent winning percentages but at a price. I've used this system to help me with soccer bets in which using some research from www.football-data.co.uk/data the past four seasons including this season has recorded right around a winning percentage of 70% consistantly every year. The price is the heave juice which is between -150 - -200 for Soccer even when weighing three possible outcomes (W-L-Draw). However, winning 70% on three possibilities I still think is pretty good. The bad news is the lack of action based off of only going with the highest odds and each team in soccer only play a game a week. But, this is overcome by using the other various soccer leagues such as th Spanish league and the Italian league. I have no clue on it's success in any of our domestic sports due to the lack of information available. I chose to go with soccer because of the wide availability of information which is contained all in one spreadsheet for an entire season per league. It was relatively easy to conduct various research with an entire season results with the posted odds al staring at me in the spread sheet. Hope this help on it's understanding. It's a good thought but if you straight wagered the system even with winning 70% you would undoubtedly only break even.
0
it takes the biggest difference between the underdog and the favorite when you subtract the odds. I did notice the author claims a 91% winning percentage, but I think he was smoking some really good stuff when he came up with that. However, the system as I've seen can pull off some decent winning percentages but at a price. I've used this system to help me with soccer bets in which using some research from www.football-data.co.uk/data the past four seasons including this season has recorded right around a winning percentage of 70% consistantly every year. The price is the heave juice which is between -150 - -200 for Soccer even when weighing three possible outcomes (W-L-Draw). However, winning 70% on three possibilities I still think is pretty good. The bad news is the lack of action based off of only going with the highest odds and each team in soccer only play a game a week. But, this is overcome by using the other various soccer leagues such as th Spanish league and the Italian league. I have no clue on it's success in any of our domestic sports due to the lack of information available. I chose to go with soccer because of the wide availability of information which is contained all in one spreadsheet for an entire season per league. It was relatively easy to conduct various research with an entire season results with the posted odds al staring at me in the spread sheet. Hope this help on it's understanding. It's a good thought but if you straight wagered the system even with winning 70% you would undoubtedly only break even.
As racinivan stated, the system targets the biggest difference between the underdog and the favorite within a specific range. The system can be used in each sport, however, it is designed to find the best bet across a number of sports. I have used it for soccer, tennis, and golf with success, however, I believe that you could probably pick out a few high chalk games at random and get the same results.
0
As racinivan stated, the system targets the biggest difference between the underdog and the favorite within a specific range. The system can be used in each sport, however, it is designed to find the best bet across a number of sports. I have used it for soccer, tennis, and golf with success, however, I believe that you could probably pick out a few high chalk games at random and get the same results.
jerm73 or vinko, could I get a copy of this if you still have it? Was trying to do more research on it but not much about it on the internet. It comes up as one of the most popular on clickbank under sports picks. Thanks.
0
jerm73 or vinko, could I get a copy of this if you still have it? Was trying to do more research on it but not much about it on the internet. It comes up as one of the most popular on clickbank under sports picks. Thanks.
it takes the biggest difference between the underdog and the favorite when you subtract the odds. I did notice the author claims a 91% winning percentage, but I think he was smoking some really good stuff when he came up with that. However, the system as I've seen can pull off some decent winning percentages but at a price. I've used this system to help me with soccer bets in which using some research from www.football-data.co.uk/data the past four seasons including this season has recorded right around a winning percentage of 70% consistantly every year. The price is the heave juice which is between -150 - -200 for Soccer even when weighing three possible outcomes (W-L-Draw). However, winning 70% on three possibilities I still think is pretty good. The bad news is the lack of action based off of only going with the highest odds and each team in soccer only play a game a week. But, this is overcome by using the other various soccer leagues such as th Spanish league and the Italian league. I have no clue on it's success in any of our domestic sports due to the lack of information available. I chose to go with soccer because of the wide availability of information which is contained all in one spreadsheet for an entire season per league. It was relatively easy to conduct various research with an entire season results with the posted odds al staring at me in the spread sheet. Hope this help on it's understanding. It's a good thought but if you straight wagered the system even with winning 70% you would undoubtedly only break even.
The biggest difference between the underdog and the favourite when you subtract the odds
That would seem to be the highest favourite of the day that is under -226 is that how is works?
0
Quote Originally Posted by racinivan:
it takes the biggest difference between the underdog and the favorite when you subtract the odds. I did notice the author claims a 91% winning percentage, but I think he was smoking some really good stuff when he came up with that. However, the system as I've seen can pull off some decent winning percentages but at a price. I've used this system to help me with soccer bets in which using some research from www.football-data.co.uk/data the past four seasons including this season has recorded right around a winning percentage of 70% consistantly every year. The price is the heave juice which is between -150 - -200 for Soccer even when weighing three possible outcomes (W-L-Draw). However, winning 70% on three possibilities I still think is pretty good. The bad news is the lack of action based off of only going with the highest odds and each team in soccer only play a game a week. But, this is overcome by using the other various soccer leagues such as th Spanish league and the Italian league. I have no clue on it's success in any of our domestic sports due to the lack of information available. I chose to go with soccer because of the wide availability of information which is contained all in one spreadsheet for an entire season per league. It was relatively easy to conduct various research with an entire season results with the posted odds al staring at me in the spread sheet. Hope this help on it's understanding. It's a good thought but if you straight wagered the system even with winning 70% you would undoubtedly only break even.
The biggest difference between the underdog and the favourite when you subtract the odds
That would seem to be the highest favourite of the day that is under -226 is that how is works?
I have seen decent results whenyou top off at below -200. I tested the system out with baseball for the 2008 season based off of wagerline.com's lines and it went 101-51 straight up. If you flat bet to win $100 every day of the season stopping in September for the 2008 season you would have been +$1300 for the season. However, I believe it makes better money with the various soccer leagues. The longest losing streak for the 08 baseball season was 3 games and for the top soccer leagues was 2 games. The only thing that I have not test was the biggest spread of all sports per day. Overall, the system does have potential, however it's the juice that kills the system. This system is equivelent to hitting 56% at -110 which is barely making profit. So, if you know a money management for high juice systems you may make this system worth while. This system will work well with positive progression money management systems which is not a chase system. Any chase system will fail here except for one that I know of. So, you have now saved yourself about $50 so enjoy the information you have just recieved. Which is nothing spectacular.
0
I have seen decent results whenyou top off at below -200. I tested the system out with baseball for the 2008 season based off of wagerline.com's lines and it went 101-51 straight up. If you flat bet to win $100 every day of the season stopping in September for the 2008 season you would have been +$1300 for the season. However, I believe it makes better money with the various soccer leagues. The longest losing streak for the 08 baseball season was 3 games and for the top soccer leagues was 2 games. The only thing that I have not test was the biggest spread of all sports per day. Overall, the system does have potential, however it's the juice that kills the system. This system is equivelent to hitting 56% at -110 which is barely making profit. So, if you know a money management for high juice systems you may make this system worth while. This system will work well with positive progression money management systems which is not a chase system. Any chase system will fail here except for one that I know of. So, you have now saved yourself about $50 so enjoy the information you have just recieved. Which is nothing spectacular.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
