I've back tested this system a few different ways. There have been some serious over streaks.
I put together if you wait for 2 overs, 2 systems loses in a row, and then start chasing the lowest posted under...Betting it this way seems like free money.
The lower the total the better it hits. If the lowest total is in the 190's it seems to be 50/50..If the lowest total is in the 170's it seems to win 75% of the time.
Also I saw the same teams popping up a lot, which makes sense..Instead of chasing the lowest total of any game, if you wait til about week 6 of the season, to see who is playing defense that year and you bet the unders in their games..Money.
This year you're damn near betting the under in every Chicago game. And if it's not them it's Indiana.
Neither team have played more than 3 over games in a row this year.
I don't know if the lowest postd total system has had any loses this year or not..But chasing Chicago or Indiana hasn't had any loses if you chase it 4 times.
I used this site for all past #'s and backtesting.
^ Iwent by the rule that 4gameshad to be scheduled in order for there to be a system play that day.
I've been meaning to backtest the idea that the lowest posted total had to be under 195 or something like that. I think it would cut out a few system loses. One good filter like that could make this system pay off big.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
