The Bedu Report: John Morrison's NBA System 2002-2003 results.

I just thought I'd post these results just to show you that this system isn't the answer to your prayers.  The lines were taken from the ATS database.

VERSION 1:

 These are the rules that I used to get these results.  We are only taking the first 3 games of an away series.  Any "push" or a "no line" on Game 1 of the series ended the play for that series.

RESULTS:

A = 29 wins

B = 17 wins

C =  5  wins

Losses = 3

The teams that lost were:

MIAMI  ( 6-10 road record at the time of lost series.)

TORONTO  ( 8-21 road record at the time of lost series.)

MILWAUKEE  ( 14-20 road record at the time of lost series.)

Note:  Chicago and Cleveland both had only 3 road wins each for the entire season, so the 3 losses couldn't be filtered out by the worst road record rule.

VERSION 1 (Games 4 thru 6)

This is for the people who play games 4 thru 6 of the road trip.

RESULTS:

A = 2 wins

B = 2 wins

C = 2 wins

L = 0

VERSION 1 (Playing the opposite or home teams against JM's version.)

RESULTS:

A = 38 wins

B = 12 wins

C =  1  win

Losses = 4

2-game loss = 1

Note:  The 2-game loss came against Portland.  Game 2 of the series resulted in a "push."  Portland went on to cover game 3 of the series which made it a 2-game loss.

Since we're playing against the JM system, I used the BEST road record filter instead of the WORST road record. 

The teams that we played against and lost were:

PORTLAND ( 2-5 road record )

GOLDEN STATE ( 6-16 road record )

BOSTON  ( 10-13 road record )

MEMPHIS  ( 4-25 road record )

2-Game loss was PORTLAND  ( 15-8 road record )

Note:  Dallas had a better road record of 16-6 at the time of the 2nd Portland series.

VERSION 1:  (Playing the opposite of JM on games 4 thru 6.)

A = 5 wins

B = 1 win

C = 0 wins

L = 0

That's all I got for VERSION 1.  I'll add the results for VERSION 2 and the UPDATED version when I have time.

Hope this helps you guys out.

GOOD LUCK!!! 

I'm just the messenger.  I have nothing against JM or the system.  It's close to a good system, but I'm just showing you that it needs some better filters.

I'm guessing that JM finally back tested his Version 2 more than a couple of years, because it sure wouldn't have won you any money.  Why else would he UPDATE such a great system?

Good luck to all.

VERSION 2:  Same rules as Version 1 except instead of all 3 teams from the opposite conference, only 2 out of 3 need to be from the opposite conference.

RESULTS:

A = 20 wins

B =  6  wins

C =  4  wins

Losses = 4

The teams that lost were:

WASHINGTON  ( 1-2 road record at the time of lost series.)    Worst road record at the time was Golden State at 1-6.

CLEVELAND  ( 1-5 road record at the time of lost series.)   Worst road record at the time was Golden State at 1-6.

GOLDEN STATE  ( 2-6 road record at the time of lost series.)   Worst road record at the time was Cleveland & Chicago at 1-12.

CLEVELAND  ( 3-27 road record at the time of lost series.)   Worst road record at the time was Chicago at 3-32.

VERSION 2:  (Games 4 thru 6)

RESULTS:

A = 3 wins

B = 1 win

C = 1 win

Losses = 0

VERSION 2: (Playing the opposite or home teams against JM's version.

RESULTS:

A = 21 wins

B =  7 wins

C =  5 wins

Losses = 1

Since we're playing against the JM system, I used the BEST road record filter instead of the WORST road record.

The team that we played against and lost was:

SAN ANTONIO  ( 23-13 road record.)   Best road record at the time was Dallas at 26-11.

VERSION 2: (Playing the opposite of JM on games 4 thru 6.)

RESULTS:

A = 2 wins

B = 3 wins

C = 0 wins

Losses = 0

VERSION 2:  UPDATED VERSION

RESULTS:

A = 5 wins

B = 1 win

C = 0 wins

Losses = 0

VERSION 2:  UPDATED VERSION (Playing the opposite or home teams.)

RESULTS:

A = 3 wins

B = 1 win

C = 2 wins

Losses = 0

If anybody has a better filter to improve our winning %, please reply.

Good luck to all.