Oh shit I got now......... - Good stuff my man - Can't go wrong with mitigating risk I may apply that too into some fine cooking I'm working on
Logically speaking is there a downside to this? Other than that
I can't place more $$ on the picks I like better (which I am avoiding -
just using this and aiming to go >50%)
No need to reinvent the wheel Stick to the program and wager each play evenly Utilize the power of your MM scheme along with your chase system parameters Also remember when I PM'ed you on how I am doing the labby? Well maybe also every how many games or so raise your profit margin goal a little. Its relative to how much and when but that could give ya some wings too
....................
0
Oh shit I got now......... - Good stuff my man - Can't go wrong with mitigating risk I may apply that too into some fine cooking I'm working on
Logically speaking is there a downside to this? Other than that
I can't place more $$ on the picks I like better (which I am avoiding -
just using this and aiming to go >50%)
No need to reinvent the wheel Stick to the program and wager each play evenly Utilize the power of your MM scheme along with your chase system parameters Also remember when I PM'ed you on how I am doing the labby? Well maybe also every how many games or so raise your profit margin goal a little. Its relative to how much and when but that could give ya some wings too
I took the very first version and made my own little twist to it too.
Example: 4.875-4.875-4.875-4.875-4.875
If a loss happen it looks like this: 4.875-4.875-4.875-4.875-4.875-4.875-4.875
Not sure if this is going to work out. But you end up spending the same amount over and over until you get enough wins.
I just take the loss and divide by 2 and add that to the line 2 times. Which means it takes 1 game to get that money back. Which means to make profit you have to win 2 times more then you loss.
But the first version only works with the toRisk and not the toWin.
Not sure if this is going to work out or not but since the line only gets longer not bigger ($$) you end up not spending as much at the end of the line. I also play 3 systems using this. Mean more bets = more wins = more profit.
But I like your idea!
0
I like the idea!
I took the very first version and made my own little twist to it too.
Example: 4.875-4.875-4.875-4.875-4.875
If a loss happen it looks like this: 4.875-4.875-4.875-4.875-4.875-4.875-4.875
Not sure if this is going to work out. But you end up spending the same amount over and over until you get enough wins.
I just take the loss and divide by 2 and add that to the line 2 times. Which means it takes 1 game to get that money back. Which means to make profit you have to win 2 times more then you loss.
But the first version only works with the toRisk and not the toWin.
Not sure if this is going to work out or not but since the line only gets longer not bigger ($$) you end up not spending as much at the end of the line. I also play 3 systems using this. Mean more bets = more wins = more profit.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.