This one has all the makings of an extended gruel-fest. Dimitrov has been underrated for some time and is not going to go quietly into the night. Zverev is not in top form generally since the ankle injury and while I can’t give a good guess on who wins this match, I fully expect a tie breaker or two, and at least 4 sets.
Over 37-1/2 w/ Ruud +2-1/2 sets parlay
+102
1
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
This one has all the makings of an extended gruel-fest. Dimitrov has been underrated for some time and is not going to go quietly into the night. Zverev is not in top form generally since the ankle injury and while I can’t give a good guess on who wins this match, I fully expect a tie breaker or two, and at least 4 sets.
@Caj727 Couldnt agree more. The over here seems like a very strong play. Strong enough to drop 6.5 units on it ($100=1 unit). As long as Dimitrov gets him a set its a wrap. Zverev will get at least 1.
Zverev is the fav why wouldn’t he get “atleast” 1…
0
Quote Originally Posted by MG4LSU84:
@Caj727 Couldnt agree more. The over here seems like a very strong play. Strong enough to drop 6.5 units on it ($100=1 unit). As long as Dimitrov gets him a set its a wrap. Zverev will get at least 1.
Zverev is the fav why wouldn’t he get “atleast” 1…
Quote Originally Posted by MG4LSU84: @Caj727 Couldnt agree more. The over here seems like a very strong play. Strong enough to drop 6.5 units on it ($100=1 unit). As long as Dimitrov gets him a set its a wrap. Zverev will get at least 1. Zverev is the fav why wouldn’t he get “atleast” 1…
You really need to take some reading comprehension classes, buddy. Not the first time I see you struggling with basic English.
He’s saying that as long as Dimitrov gets a set, then the bet is good bc Zverev will definitely get at least one.
Holy cow…
0
Quote Originally Posted by UnrankedChamp:
Quote Originally Posted by MG4LSU84: @Caj727 Couldnt agree more. The over here seems like a very strong play. Strong enough to drop 6.5 units on it ($100=1 unit). As long as Dimitrov gets him a set its a wrap. Zverev will get at least 1. Zverev is the fav why wouldn’t he get “atleast” 1…
You really need to take some reading comprehension classes, buddy. Not the first time I see you struggling with basic English.
He’s saying that as long as Dimitrov gets a set, then the bet is good bc Zverev will definitely get at least one.
i think what he’s saying is, as long as Dimitrov gets a set, you’re good because Zverev is good for at least one. The worry in this play is, does Dimitrov win a set. And as we enter the 3rd, this isn’t boding well.
I interpreted the statement as, as long as Dimitrov wins one set, the over looks good because Zverev is good for one. For anyone reading this who isn’t up on tennis current affairs, it makes sense.
Fingers crossed D can score one here.
1
@UnrankedChamp
i think what he’s saying is, as long as Dimitrov gets a set, you’re good because Zverev is good for at least one. The worry in this play is, does Dimitrov win a set. And as we enter the 3rd, this isn’t boding well.
I interpreted the statement as, as long as Dimitrov wins one set, the over looks good because Zverev is good for one. For anyone reading this who isn’t up on tennis current affairs, it makes sense.
100 percent agree. Dimitrov remains a bum. Just mistake after mistake with this guy. After going up 4-2 in the second and at 40-15 for 5-2, he preceded to lose 13 straight points.
0
@Ferguson_Funk
100 percent agree. Dimitrov remains a bum. Just mistake after mistake with this guy. After going up 4-2 in the second and at 40-15 for 5-2, he preceded to lose 13 straight points.
I had dimitrov +4 as a strong play too.. that guy played like he didnt want to be there.. should have just retired after the second set to go home early if that was his intentions from the start.. the people who lost before him would have put a stronger performance..
0
I had dimitrov +4 as a strong play too.. that guy played like he didnt want to be there.. should have just retired after the second set to go home early if that was his intentions from the start.. the people who lost before him would have put a stronger performance..
This was not the same Dimitrov we’ve seen all season. 50 UFE. That’s crazy high. He was playing pretty good all season and then had no stuff today. Maybe its his age, maybe it was an injury… maybe it was Maybeline. It was a good play. Unlucky.
0
This was not the same Dimitrov we’ve seen all season. 50 UFE. That’s crazy high. He was playing pretty good all season and then had no stuff today. Maybe its his age, maybe it was an injury… maybe it was Maybeline. It was a good play. Unlucky.
This was not the same Dimitrov we’ve seen all season. 50 UFE. That’s crazy high. He was playing pretty good all season and then had no stuff today. Maybe its his age, maybe it was an injury… maybe it was Maybeline. It was a good play. Unlucky.
I simply think he got out played and made ugly errors. Nothing more to it Average.
1
Quote Originally Posted by AverageAllstar:
This was not the same Dimitrov we’ve seen all season. 50 UFE. That’s crazy high. He was playing pretty good all season and then had no stuff today. Maybe its his age, maybe it was an injury… maybe it was Maybeline. It was a good play. Unlucky.
I simply think he got out played and made ugly errors. Nothing more to it Average.
Without a doubt, Zverev was the better player today. Hindsight is 20/20 on that count. But despite his recent losses to Djoker and Alcarez in his last couple tournaments, he played so much better in the up coming weeks. Making winners and fewer errors, lost due to superior players. If he brought that game today, this could have been not only a 4-5 setter, but a different result. He was shit today.
0
@jvarghese
Without a doubt, Zverev was the better player today. Hindsight is 20/20 on that count. But despite his recent losses to Djoker and Alcarez in his last couple tournaments, he played so much better in the up coming weeks. Making winners and fewer errors, lost due to superior players. If he brought that game today, this could have been not only a 4-5 setter, but a different result. He was shit today.
Yeah bad read by me guys. Zverev seems to be gearing back into top form. But this was not the Dimitrov I was expecting. This was the Dimitrov of about five years ago when his career was seemingly in the toilet and he just loafed his way thru matches before that surreal deep run in the US Open. Looked like a bum once again today.
0
Yeah bad read by me guys. Zverev seems to be gearing back into top form. But this was not the Dimitrov I was expecting. This was the Dimitrov of about five years ago when his career was seemingly in the toilet and he just loafed his way thru matches before that surreal deep run in the US Open. Looked like a bum once again today.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.