Is nadal the Goat

Federer to me was top of the trio 

how was their head to head matches? 

For me no, he’s the king of clay and comebacks, to be the goat you need to be good on all surfaces in my opinion.

Novak is always going to be the east Europe bad guy in peoples minds, so no matter if he finishes with 3-4 more grand slams than Roger and Nadal people still won’t rate him. 

If it would have been Roger or Nadal who hit the ball boy in US open or was unvaccinated, would they have been banned from two grand slams in their prime?

So I would go with Roger, Novak and Roger wouldn’t be as good as they are if it wasn’t for Roger, he changed the game.

For u guys who said no the guys still great regardless 

Don't forget also what Joker about said Osaka and how he felt about that whole situation too.  Nadal was a class act, complied with the rules, and most of all just stfu and just played tennis.  If it wasn't for the injuries he would have more Majors.  Novak is just getting all thats coming to him and deservedly so.  Hope he never wins another major so fuck em

@borg

Federer has exactly one French Open title he is the LEAST well rounded of the big three.  So if you’re saying the player has to be great on all surfaces to me then Federer is out of the discussion. Nadal or Djokovic both have multiple French , US , Aust, and Wimbledon grand slam titles. 

If Nadal is the king of clay then you have to say Roger is king of grass, no? Feel like there’s a lot of preconceptions in people’s minds when it comes to these mostly senseless “who is better?” debates. To me Roger is the more one dimensional player while  Nadal only gets credit for being insanely great on clay.