All Forums | Tennis

WTA/ ATP ON FRIDAY

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1399
Posts: 24
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 9041
Posted: #1
BNP Paribas WTA Finals @ Singapore.........9-1

Svetlana Kuznetsova -110
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 9041
Posted: #2
Erste Bank Open 500 @ Vienna, Austria

Viktor Troicki -105
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 12084
Posted: #3
Be careful with kuz...she has already clinched semi spot and Garbine is hungry to get one win
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 9041
Posted: #4
Quote Originally Posted by payne034:

Be careful with kuz...she has already clinched semi spot and Garbine is hungry to get one win

Where is your thread?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 9041
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by ImBoring:

Good luck; great job on the women this week 

Thanks.....I played Radwanska -270 in a parlay with Kuz if you are wondering where I went in the other match. It appear that we have posters that don't think I know whats going on in Singapore
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 3189
Posted: #6
I'm on Kuznetsova but instead of going moneyline which is -105 at my book I just decided on taking the sets bet +1.5 -118

GL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 3189
Posted: #7
nevermind stupid mistake I saw +1.5 and thought it was the set bet lmao its actually the spread Im rolling with the moneyline -105
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 393
Posted: #8
I wanted to play Kuznetsova until I read about their position. Essentially im afraid she may conserve her energy for her semifinal clash with Cibulkova which will be only 24 hours or so after her clash with Muguruza. 

What's the financial incentive of winning this match? I see theres 200 points up for grabs. 

I see this is Muguruzas last match of the season and has nothing to lose. 

Do you mind briefly explaining your position?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2015
Posts: 3424
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by yeghia:

I wanted to play Kuznetsova until I read about their position. Essentially im afraid she may conserve her energy for her semifinal clash with Cibulkova which will be only 24 hours or so after her clash with Muguruza. 

What's the financial incentive of winning this match? I see theres 200 points up for grabs. 

I see this is Muguruzas last match of the season and has nothing to lose. 

Do you mind briefly explaining your position?

Muguruza may also want to just end this match and get on a flight out of Singapore.... She hasn't played well, her ankle is hurt and she's unhappy with her performances... Her confidence isn't there.

I'm going Svetlana, but nervous myself. I don't think she'll conserve energy to be honest.... if she wins the first set she should win in straights IMO
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 393
Posted: #10
to add to the discussion I read of it potentially being a "revenge" match for kuznetsova after losing to her in the french open 

to counter she's been fighting to make it here and to win singapore and that is the ultimate goal, saw kuznetsova line move from -105 to -115, smart money going on kuznetsova?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2015
Posts: 3424
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by yeghia:

to add to the discussion I read of it potentially being a "revenge" match for kuznetsova after losing to her in the french open 

to counter she's been fighting to make it here and to win singapore and that is the ultimate goal, saw kuznetsova line move from -105 to -115, smart money going on kuznetsova?
Line movement doesn't matter to me, I'm going to Kuznetsova, but neither is a confident pick. Kuznetsova could throw in the towel if she goes down early, same with Garbine... Garbine gave up against Radwasnka
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 393
Posted: #12
To answer my own question: $153,000 and 230 points to the winner of the match. I don't see either player with an incentive to not go 100%

See below for full breakdown. 


Champion: $ 1,750,000 plus round robin win prize
Runner-up: $ 590,000 plus round robin win prize
Semifinalist: $ 40,000 plus round robin win prize
Round Robin win per match: $ 153,000
Participation Fee: 3 matches: $151,000; 2 matches: $130,000; 1 match: $110,000
Alternates: 2 matches: $ 109,000; 1 match: $ 89,000; 0 match: $ 68,000

Here are the ranking points breakdown of WTA Finals Singapore 2016:

Champion: RR points accumulated + 810
Runner-up: RR points accumulated + 360
Semifinalist: RR points accumulated
Round Robin points per match: 230

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 12084
Posted: #13
Didn't know I had to create a thread last time I checked this is a discussion forum. I have been nothing but respectful to u and I state a great point and u get aggrevated...guess the 0 N 1 set proved my point but what do I know
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 4125
Posted: #14
Looks like you were right, wgomel is a loser
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2014
Posts: 264
Posted: #15
oh I did not see that gomel was on Radwanska as well as Kuzi.

Pliskova has all the weapons and form to take this one today.
Should have played here, instead I layed off. See how it finished, but Pliskova looks strong!!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 9041
Posted: #16
Kuz.....Loss

Radwanska....wins in straight sets


Since I played its in a parlay its a loss.....8-2 Overall
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 9041
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by wgomel21:

Kuz.....Loss

Radwanska....wins in straight sets


Since I played its in a parlay its a loss.....8-2 Overall

Correction 9-2 Overall......

Lets go Troicki
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5092
Posted: #18
With you on Troicki. Let's go!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 3230
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by wgomel21:


Correction 9-2 Overall......

Lets go Troicki

Are you kidding me TRICKORI sucksssssssssssss  hahaha

Ill tell you who the real winners are they are FERRER beats TRICKORI and DEL PORTRO beats Japanese BOY 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 2971
Posted: #20
Oh hai everyone... I'm Sunset... I point out winners and losers after matches have started or concluded. That's how smart I am!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 9041
Posted: #21
Troicki blows match point, than blows his serve 5-5. Don't like where we are sitting now
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2001
Posts: 19829
Posted: #22
Spaniard is making him pay.  Damnit Troicki.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 3230
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by wgomel21:

Troicki blows match point, than blows his serve 5-5. Don't like where we are sitting now

you should never TRUST A OLD MAN 
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 9041
Posted: #24
The Old Fashion Joke Job....Blows his serve twice down the stretch.


Ferrer has beaten me twice...

Troicki....Loss
All Forums | Tennis
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.