because he pulled a rabbit out of his @ss beating murray you are going to go back to the well to see if you can make it happen again. Well he won't and you won't win. whatever you bet is wasted money. You ll learn young grasshopper. You missed the bus, quit trying to force it
0
because he pulled a rabbit out of his @ss beating murray you are going to go back to the well to see if you can make it happen again. Well he won't and you won't win. whatever you bet is wasted money. You ll learn young grasshopper. You missed the bus, quit trying to force it
I believe that Federer is easy going to handle Zverev's unusual style. He played many many easy balls through the middle against Murray... Federer will destroy him in this situations.. furthermore he will go to the net again and again.. and federer will be killing him here again imo
0
I believe that Federer is easy going to handle Zverev's unusual style. He played many many easy balls through the middle against Murray... Federer will destroy him in this situations.. furthermore he will go to the net again and again.. and federer will be killing him here again imo
I understand he beat Murray but Murray was HORRIBLE. He broke Zverev twice in the first and got broken twice back once from 40-0 up and the other time from serving for the set.
One of the worst matches I've seen Murray play. Multiple passing shots into the net, little to no use of the lob.
I think he can only trouble Fed if he serves extremely well but there has to be a drop in level just for the fact he hs to play 2 top level guys in a row unlike Istomin who played Djoko and then a decent player in Busta
If Fed has a routine first set,match won't be close
0
I understand he beat Murray but Murray was HORRIBLE. He broke Zverev twice in the first and got broken twice back once from 40-0 up and the other time from serving for the set.
One of the worst matches I've seen Murray play. Multiple passing shots into the net, little to no use of the lob.
I think he can only trouble Fed if he serves extremely well but there has to be a drop in level just for the fact he hs to play 2 top level guys in a row unlike Istomin who played Djoko and then a decent player in Busta
If Fed has a routine first set,match won't be close
Easy to say now, but if you're looking for a cinderella run from an unknown, stick to women's tennis. The women show far less consistency, and even their best player (Serena) can lose early sometimes. In women's tennis, an unknown can make a deep run.
In men's tennis, the top players are far more consistent. This is really an exception tournament in that Murray and Djokovic got bounced early.
Typically, men the pull the upsets are one and done. Either they played an incredible match that won't be duplicable, or just a strategy that flustered someone like Zverev did with his net work vs. Murray.
Typically the emotion and typically long match wheres the underdog out, and they're gone by the next round. Only deep run I can think of off the top of my head were either a Soderling or Del Potro maybe, but those were actually top well known guys at the time.
P.S. When the line seems high and has value, that's typically a teller that the dude has no chance. If the line is so low that it's not worth it to bite, that's when you'd typically want to take the underdog. Big lines work much better in women's tennis where people lose all the time.
0
Easy to say now, but if you're looking for a cinderella run from an unknown, stick to women's tennis. The women show far less consistency, and even their best player (Serena) can lose early sometimes. In women's tennis, an unknown can make a deep run.
In men's tennis, the top players are far more consistent. This is really an exception tournament in that Murray and Djokovic got bounced early.
Typically, men the pull the upsets are one and done. Either they played an incredible match that won't be duplicable, or just a strategy that flustered someone like Zverev did with his net work vs. Murray.
Typically the emotion and typically long match wheres the underdog out, and they're gone by the next round. Only deep run I can think of off the top of my head were either a Soderling or Del Potro maybe, but those were actually top well known guys at the time.
P.S. When the line seems high and has value, that's typically a teller that the dude has no chance. If the line is so low that it's not worth it to bite, that's when you'd typically want to take the underdog. Big lines work much better in women's tennis where people lose all the time.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.