While testing some software last year in MLB, we collected results for the last two and a half months of the season and calculated teams BREAK and CONTINUE percentages when they were on winning or losing streaks. A team was on Step 1 of a streak once they recorded 3 like decisions in a row, so on Step 1 a team is going for four in a row, step 2 is going for 5 in a row and so on.
Here's what we've found:
BAD TEAMS (teams with a .500 record or worse) on a Step 1 losing streak were 51 - 51 (50% ATS). But is the team is a Home/Fav/ 121 - 140 then their record is 7 - 0, which means they have broken the losing streak all 7 times in this game situation. Other notable subset situations:
H/F101 - 120: 5 - 2
R/F 101 - 120: 6 - 2
R/D 181 - 200: 0 - 5
H/d 141 - 160: 2 - 6
BAD TEAMS ON A STEP 1 WINNING STREAK: 33 breaks - 16 continues (67.35%) Break Percentage.
Good and Bad Situations:
H/D 101 - 120: 4 - 1
H/F 121 - 140: 5 - 1
R/D 121 - 140: 4 - 0
GOOD TEAMS ON A STEP 1 LOSING STREAK: 9 - 14 (39.13%)
Good and Bad Situations:
H/F 181 and up: 3 - 0
H/F; H/D; R/F all at 101 - 120: combined 1 - 4
GOOD TEAMS ON A STEP 2 LOSING STREAK: 12 - 3 (80%). 12 out of 15 broke their losing streak at this step.
3 losses came as:
H/F 101 - 120
R/F 101 - 120
R/F 141 - 160
BAD TEAMS ON A STEP 2 LOSING STREAK: 19 - 27 (41.23%)
BEST SITUATIONS:
H/D 101 - 120: 0 - 6 (streak continued all 6 times)
R/D 101 - 120: 5 - 2
H/F 121 - 140: 3 - 1
R/D 121 - 140: 1 - 3
After the all star break I am finally going to have the completed version of these streak tables uploaded to my tracker. So we will have all the 2nd half stats from last year and all the first half stats from this year to use to find good situations in the second half. One of the tool is done I will make a walkthrough video on how to use it. Searching through this test data, as you can see, I have uncovered some really golden stats, it will be interesting to see what happens to these stats once yhe first half of this year is added to them. Did they correct? Or did they stay on track? Should be interesting. Because besides corrections within handicapping stats, I alos have seen momentum, meaning when something starts out 3 - 0 or 3 - 1 usually it carries that momentum out at least 5 - 8 more trials. I have seen that countless times. These streak tables will be good for us in every sport to see how teams perform when they are on a streak ATS backed up by historical percentages.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
While testing some software last year in MLB, we collected results for the last two and a half months of the season and calculated teams BREAK and CONTINUE percentages when they were on winning or losing streaks. A team was on Step 1 of a streak once they recorded 3 like decisions in a row, so on Step 1 a team is going for four in a row, step 2 is going for 5 in a row and so on.
Here's what we've found:
BAD TEAMS (teams with a .500 record or worse) on a Step 1 losing streak were 51 - 51 (50% ATS). But is the team is a Home/Fav/ 121 - 140 then their record is 7 - 0, which means they have broken the losing streak all 7 times in this game situation. Other notable subset situations:
H/F101 - 120: 5 - 2
R/F 101 - 120: 6 - 2
R/D 181 - 200: 0 - 5
H/d 141 - 160: 2 - 6
BAD TEAMS ON A STEP 1 WINNING STREAK: 33 breaks - 16 continues (67.35%) Break Percentage.
Good and Bad Situations:
H/D 101 - 120: 4 - 1
H/F 121 - 140: 5 - 1
R/D 121 - 140: 4 - 0
GOOD TEAMS ON A STEP 1 LOSING STREAK: 9 - 14 (39.13%)
Good and Bad Situations:
H/F 181 and up: 3 - 0
H/F; H/D; R/F all at 101 - 120: combined 1 - 4
GOOD TEAMS ON A STEP 2 LOSING STREAK: 12 - 3 (80%). 12 out of 15 broke their losing streak at this step.
3 losses came as:
H/F 101 - 120
R/F 101 - 120
R/F 141 - 160
BAD TEAMS ON A STEP 2 LOSING STREAK: 19 - 27 (41.23%)
BEST SITUATIONS:
H/D 101 - 120: 0 - 6 (streak continued all 6 times)
R/D 101 - 120: 5 - 2
H/F 121 - 140: 3 - 1
R/D 121 - 140: 1 - 3
After the all star break I am finally going to have the completed version of these streak tables uploaded to my tracker. So we will have all the 2nd half stats from last year and all the first half stats from this year to use to find good situations in the second half. One of the tool is done I will make a walkthrough video on how to use it. Searching through this test data, as you can see, I have uncovered some really golden stats, it will be interesting to see what happens to these stats once yhe first half of this year is added to them. Did they correct? Or did they stay on track? Should be interesting. Because besides corrections within handicapping stats, I alos have seen momentum, meaning when something starts out 3 - 0 or 3 - 1 usually it carries that momentum out at least 5 - 8 more trials. I have seen that countless times. These streak tables will be good for us in every sport to see how teams perform when they are on a streak ATS backed up by historical percentages.
Loking through the games today, I saw that ARI is on a STEP 1 LOSING STREAK with the kine being ARI +225. Teams on this step as a R/D 181 or more have a break percentage of 0%. 0 - 5. That means the losing streak has continued all 5 times.
0
Loking through the games today, I saw that ARI is on a STEP 1 LOSING STREAK with the kine being ARI +225. Teams on this step as a R/D 181 or more have a break percentage of 0%. 0 - 5. That means the losing streak has continued all 5 times.
Soon the software will be readily available where every bettor who'd like to know such things in every sport will have the opportunity at their finger tips.
0
Soon the software will be readily available where every bettor who'd like to know such things in every sport will have the opportunity at their finger tips.
just did a quick look over the trend query and I fond a nice spot for people to fade in the 2nd half and it should appear 5 times or more:
FADE MIA as a R/D 120 or less. That's a spot where MIA should win 45.5% of the time probability wise. They are winning in this spot 78% of the time their last nine.
Hopefully before play resumes I can compile the full list of the Follow/Fade correction situations and I'd bet on the unit Total at the end of the season will be higher than any pregame pro will do in MLB in the 2nd half.
0
just did a quick look over the trend query and I fond a nice spot for people to fade in the 2nd half and it should appear 5 times or more:
FADE MIA as a R/D 120 or less. That's a spot where MIA should win 45.5% of the time probability wise. They are winning in this spot 78% of the time their last nine.
Hopefully before play resumes I can compile the full list of the Follow/Fade correction situations and I'd bet on the unit Total at the end of the season will be higher than any pregame pro will do in MLB in the 2nd half.
For the 2nd half of the MLB season, I will have the Trend Query and The Steak Tables working in full capacity (finally). Right now, there's only a few people entering MLB picks into the tracker. If we could get 30 - 50 people willing to make 2nd half MLB picks into the tracker, I could use the consensus tools and look for games where each tool and the consensus points the same way as to the team with the highest probability of winning. I'll post the picks here at covers in a thread. We need at least 30 but more like 50 or more in order for the consensus to have data to work with. NFL we have no problem getting people, NBA either, MLB is challenging because you have the Godfather of sports coming up in about 8 weeks and people are just lying low. We can keep the pick record and unit won/lost total right here so everyone can see.
0
For the 2nd half of the MLB season, I will have the Trend Query and The Steak Tables working in full capacity (finally). Right now, there's only a few people entering MLB picks into the tracker. If we could get 30 - 50 people willing to make 2nd half MLB picks into the tracker, I could use the consensus tools and look for games where each tool and the consensus points the same way as to the team with the highest probability of winning. I'll post the picks here at covers in a thread. We need at least 30 but more like 50 or more in order for the consensus to have data to work with. NFL we have no problem getting people, NBA either, MLB is challenging because you have the Godfather of sports coming up in about 8 weeks and people are just lying low. We can keep the pick record and unit won/lost total right here so everyone can see.
For the 2nd half of the MLB season, I will have the Trend Query and The Steak Tables working in full capacity (finally). Right now, there's only a few people entering MLB picks into the tracker. If we could get 30 - 50 people willing to make 2nd half MLB picks into the tracker, I could use the consensus tools and look for games where each tool and the consensus points the same way as to the team with the highest probability of winning. I'll post the picks here at covers in a thread. We need at least 30 but more like 50 or more in order for the consensus to have data to work with. NFL we have no problem getting people, NBA either, MLB is challenging because you have the Godfather of sports coming up in about 8 weeks and people are just lying low. We can keep the pick record and unit won/lost total right here so everyone can see.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TonyTotals:
For the 2nd half of the MLB season, I will have the Trend Query and The Steak Tables working in full capacity (finally). Right now, there's only a few people entering MLB picks into the tracker. If we could get 30 - 50 people willing to make 2nd half MLB picks into the tracker, I could use the consensus tools and look for games where each tool and the consensus points the same way as to the team with the highest probability of winning. I'll post the picks here at covers in a thread. We need at least 30 but more like 50 or more in order for the consensus to have data to work with. NFL we have no problem getting people, NBA either, MLB is challenging because you have the Godfather of sports coming up in about 8 weeks and people are just lying low. We can keep the pick record and unit won/lost total right here so everyone can see.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.