After breaking down the numbers, I see the Mystics covering this spread, but maybe not so easily. But I see them winning this matchup by at least 7 pts without a doubt...
Last match played in their H2H, Washington took the game by 7 in Chicago. Difference was, Lavender's court presence/rebounds vs Washington missing Messeman. Also Chicago was jot at that time, winning 5 out of their past 7.
Fast forward to today, Chicago has looked shaky during their past 2, after being on a hot streak in their prior 5. They are missing Lavender's court presence, along with her rebounds. Washington has become more versatile, with messeman putting up consistent numbers & making a presence in their front court.
WAS averages around 88, compared to CHI at around 82 per game. Big differential is in the defensive category with CHI being out of whack & their TO ratio.....
CHI will have to come up with a high output FG % for the "full duration" of this matchup, in order to even stay close to WAS's high offensive output, because their defense certainly will not carry them in this game, especially with the big woman out in Lavender. One blink in CHI's defensive miscue, or one stretch where CHI slows down in offense, it is game over.
Either way, even if CHI does everything well, I see WAS covering -5.5 easily.... I have pressed the wager button at a nice value of -105 with full confidence.
LETS CASH THIS GENTS!!!!!!!!!!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Mystics -5.5 @-105, 10% BR invested.
After breaking down the numbers, I see the Mystics covering this spread, but maybe not so easily. But I see them winning this matchup by at least 7 pts without a doubt...
Last match played in their H2H, Washington took the game by 7 in Chicago. Difference was, Lavender's court presence/rebounds vs Washington missing Messeman. Also Chicago was jot at that time, winning 5 out of their past 7.
Fast forward to today, Chicago has looked shaky during their past 2, after being on a hot streak in their prior 5. They are missing Lavender's court presence, along with her rebounds. Washington has become more versatile, with messeman putting up consistent numbers & making a presence in their front court.
WAS averages around 88, compared to CHI at around 82 per game. Big differential is in the defensive category with CHI being out of whack & their TO ratio.....
CHI will have to come up with a high output FG % for the "full duration" of this matchup, in order to even stay close to WAS's high offensive output, because their defense certainly will not carry them in this game, especially with the big woman out in Lavender. One blink in CHI's defensive miscue, or one stretch where CHI slows down in offense, it is game over.
Either way, even if CHI does everything well, I see WAS covering -5.5 easily.... I have pressed the wager button at a nice value of -105 with full confidence.
Mystics -5.5 @-105, 10% BR invested. After breaking down the numbers, I see the Mystics covering this spread, but maybe not so easily. But I see them winning this matchup by at least 7 pts without a doubt... Last match played in their H2H, Washington took the game by 7 in Chicago. Difference was, Lavender's court presence/rebounds vs Washington missing Messeman. Also Chicago was jot at that time, winning 5 out of their past 7. Fast forward to today, Chicago has looked shaky during their past 2, after being on a hot streak in their prior 5. They are missing Lavender's court presence, along with her rebounds. Washington has become more versatile, with messeman putting up consistent numbers & making a presence in their front court. WAS averages around 88, compared to CHI at around 82 per game. Big differential is in the defensive category with CHI being out of whack & their TO ratio..... CHI will have to come up with a high output FG % for the "full duration" of this matchup, in order to even stay close to WAS's high offensive output, because their defense certainly will not carry them in this game, especially with the big woman out in Lavender. One blink in CHI's defensive miscue, or one stretch where CHI slows down in offense, it is game over. Either way, even if CHI does everything well, I see WAS covering -5.5 easily.... I have pressed the wager button at a nice value of -105 with full confidence. LETS CASH THIS GENTS!!!!!!!!!!
Adding a bonus play in tennis:
Magda Linette ML @+122, 3% BR invested
0
Quote Originally Posted by tanis74:
Mystics -5.5 @-105, 10% BR invested. After breaking down the numbers, I see the Mystics covering this spread, but maybe not so easily. But I see them winning this matchup by at least 7 pts without a doubt... Last match played in their H2H, Washington took the game by 7 in Chicago. Difference was, Lavender's court presence/rebounds vs Washington missing Messeman. Also Chicago was jot at that time, winning 5 out of their past 7. Fast forward to today, Chicago has looked shaky during their past 2, after being on a hot streak in their prior 5. They are missing Lavender's court presence, along with her rebounds. Washington has become more versatile, with messeman putting up consistent numbers & making a presence in their front court. WAS averages around 88, compared to CHI at around 82 per game. Big differential is in the defensive category with CHI being out of whack & their TO ratio..... CHI will have to come up with a high output FG % for the "full duration" of this matchup, in order to even stay close to WAS's high offensive output, because their defense certainly will not carry them in this game, especially with the big woman out in Lavender. One blink in CHI's defensive miscue, or one stretch where CHI slows down in offense, it is game over. Either way, even if CHI does everything well, I see WAS covering -5.5 easily.... I have pressed the wager button at a nice value of -105 with full confidence. LETS CASH THIS GENTS!!!!!!!!!!
Mystics -5.5 @-105, 10% BR invested. After breaking down the numbers, I see the Mystics covering this spread, but maybe not so easily. But I see them winning this matchup by at least 7 pts without a doubt... Last match played in their H2H, Washington took the game by 7 in Chicago. Difference was, Lavender's court presence/rebounds vs Washington missing Messeman. Also Chicago was jot at that time, winning 5 out of their past 7. Fast forward to today, Chicago has looked shaky during their past 2, after being on a hot streak in their prior 5. They are missing Lavender's court presence, along with her rebounds. Washington has become more versatile, with messeman putting up consistent numbers & making a presence in their front court. WAS averages around 88, compared to CHI at around 82 per game. Big differential is in the defensive category with CHI being out of whack & their TO ratio..... CHI will have to come up with a high output FG % for the "full duration" of this matchup, in order to even stay close to WAS's high offensive output, because their defense certainly will not carry them in this game, especially with the big woman out in Lavender. One blink in CHI's defensive miscue, or one stretch where CHI slows down in offense, it is game over. Either way, even if CHI does everything well, I see WAS covering -5.5 easily.... I have pressed the wager button at a nice value of -105 with full confidence. LETS CASH THIS GENTS!!!!!!!!!!
Adding a bonus play in tennis: Magda Linette ML @+122, 3% BR invested
good start to the day.
Linette for the WIN.
up 3.66% roi
1
Quote Originally Posted by tanis74:
Quote Originally Posted by tanis74:
Mystics -5.5 @-105, 10% BR invested. After breaking down the numbers, I see the Mystics covering this spread, but maybe not so easily. But I see them winning this matchup by at least 7 pts without a doubt... Last match played in their H2H, Washington took the game by 7 in Chicago. Difference was, Lavender's court presence/rebounds vs Washington missing Messeman. Also Chicago was jot at that time, winning 5 out of their past 7. Fast forward to today, Chicago has looked shaky during their past 2, after being on a hot streak in their prior 5. They are missing Lavender's court presence, along with her rebounds. Washington has become more versatile, with messeman putting up consistent numbers & making a presence in their front court. WAS averages around 88, compared to CHI at around 82 per game. Big differential is in the defensive category with CHI being out of whack & their TO ratio..... CHI will have to come up with a high output FG % for the "full duration" of this matchup, in order to even stay close to WAS's high offensive output, because their defense certainly will not carry them in this game, especially with the big woman out in Lavender. One blink in CHI's defensive miscue, or one stretch where CHI slows down in offense, it is game over. Either way, even if CHI does everything well, I see WAS covering -5.5 easily.... I have pressed the wager button at a nice value of -105 with full confidence. LETS CASH THIS GENTS!!!!!!!!!!
Adding a bonus play in tennis: Magda Linette ML @+122, 3% BR invested
Mystics -5.5 @-105, 10% BR invested. After breaking down the numbers, I see the Mystics covering this spread, but maybe not so easily. But I see them winning this matchup by at least 7 pts without a doubt... Last match played in their H2H, Washington took the game by 7 in Chicago. Difference was, Lavender's court presence/rebounds vs Washington missing Messeman. Also Chicago was jot at that time, winning 5 out of their past 7. Fast forward to today, Chicago has looked shaky during their past 2, after being on a hot streak in their prior 5. They are missing Lavender's court presence, along with her rebounds. Washington has become more versatile, with messeman putting up consistent numbers & making a presence in their front court. WAS averages around 88, compared to CHI at around 82 per game. Big differential is in the defensive category with CHI being out of whack & their TO ratio..... CHI will have to come up with a high output FG % for the "full duration" of this matchup, in order to even stay close to WAS's high offensive output, because their defense certainly will not carry them in this game, especially with the big woman out in Lavender. One blink in CHI's defensive miscue, or one stretch where CHI slows down in offense, it is game over. Either way, even if CHI does everything well, I see WAS covering -5.5 easily.... I have pressed the wager button at a nice value of -105 with full confidence. LETS CASH THIS GENTS!!!!!!!!!!
Adding a bonus play in tennis: Magda Linette ML @+122, 3% BR invested
good start to the day. Linette for the WIN. up 3.66% roi
WTF is up with WAS 3rd quarter!!!
smh
0
Quote Originally Posted by tanis74:
Quote Originally Posted by tanis74:
Quote Originally Posted by tanis74:
Mystics -5.5 @-105, 10% BR invested. After breaking down the numbers, I see the Mystics covering this spread, but maybe not so easily. But I see them winning this matchup by at least 7 pts without a doubt... Last match played in their H2H, Washington took the game by 7 in Chicago. Difference was, Lavender's court presence/rebounds vs Washington missing Messeman. Also Chicago was jot at that time, winning 5 out of their past 7. Fast forward to today, Chicago has looked shaky during their past 2, after being on a hot streak in their prior 5. They are missing Lavender's court presence, along with her rebounds. Washington has become more versatile, with messeman putting up consistent numbers & making a presence in their front court. WAS averages around 88, compared to CHI at around 82 per game. Big differential is in the defensive category with CHI being out of whack & their TO ratio..... CHI will have to come up with a high output FG % for the "full duration" of this matchup, in order to even stay close to WAS's high offensive output, because their defense certainly will not carry them in this game, especially with the big woman out in Lavender. One blink in CHI's defensive miscue, or one stretch where CHI slows down in offense, it is game over. Either way, even if CHI does everything well, I see WAS covering -5.5 easily.... I have pressed the wager button at a nice value of -105 with full confidence. LETS CASH THIS GENTS!!!!!!!!!!
Adding a bonus play in tennis: Magda Linette ML @+122, 3% BR invested
good start to the day. Linette for the WIN. up 3.66% roi
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
