SEA-9 ATL 170 Well this is seductive but tricky. SEA is a good defensive team. ATL likes to run and gun it now. This could go way over. I doubt this line starts at 166-ish but if it does I am on board over. Some teams just have no real BIGS. ATL being one. C Williams is your best rebounder? At like 5'8" Wow. SEA off a loss and scoring in the 60's. This line might start at -7 but SEA not blowing people out. I am liking over game and 1Q over on the game total...I think
IND CHI-4.5 164 Hmm another weird malicious one. I mean CHI plays with four guards who all are skilled and who all turn the ball over WAY too much. Then they have Dolson who wants to be a guard and is like 6'5"! Get some rebounds you lesbian!! She gets like one a game. So then they rely on the bench to get the boards. I guess Dolson does not really start yet. NDour, Heberd I guess. Then we have IND that all they get are boards and it takes three offensive rebounds for the Amazon lesbian to score. hmmm. I will shoot myself if I take CHI again. IND losers of 5 straight. A sad muff-diving squad. CHI losers of 7 straight. A sad muff-diving squad. What is a Brutal One to do? I THINK to take the under here. Lets see. Actually, both these tilts may be better to hit the 2H o/u after seeing them get tired in the first half.
Brutal Joe in da Big Apple!!
1
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Tuesday
2-1-1 (0-0) +4.75 units
All
53-44 (21-8) +103.75u (+$10,375)
Lets guess some tasty brutal lines
SEA-9 ATL 170 Well this is seductive but tricky. SEA is a good defensive team. ATL likes to run and gun it now. This could go way over. I doubt this line starts at 166-ish but if it does I am on board over. Some teams just have no real BIGS. ATL being one. C Williams is your best rebounder? At like 5'8" Wow. SEA off a loss and scoring in the 60's. This line might start at -7 but SEA not blowing people out. I am liking over game and 1Q over on the game total...I think
IND CHI-4.5 164 Hmm another weird malicious one. I mean CHI plays with four guards who all are skilled and who all turn the ball over WAY too much. Then they have Dolson who wants to be a guard and is like 6'5"! Get some rebounds you lesbian!! She gets like one a game. So then they rely on the bench to get the boards. I guess Dolson does not really start yet. NDour, Heberd I guess. Then we have IND that all they get are boards and it takes three offensive rebounds for the Amazon lesbian to score. hmmm. I will shoot myself if I take CHI again. IND losers of 5 straight. A sad muff-diving squad. CHI losers of 7 straight. A sad muff-diving squad. What is a Brutal One to do? I THINK to take the under here. Lets see. Actually, both these tilts may be better to hit the 2H o/u after seeing them get tired in the first half.
Also the CP effect is overrated here on CHI. Another TO Machine to go along with the other TO Machines on that team. And really Defensive Player of Year? Seriously? How did she get that?
Brutal Joe
2
PLAY 1 SEA-ATL 84o 1H MAX PLAY!!
Also the CP effect is overrated here on CHI. Another TO Machine to go along with the other TO Machines on that team. And really Defensive Player of Year? Seriously? How did she get that?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.