Final Nov 21
JMU 99 -3.0 o146.0
UIC 81 3.0 u146.0
Final Nov 21
MIA 69 -9.0 o143.0
DRKE 80 9.0 u143.0
Final OT Nov 21
OHIO 81 -2.0 o146.5
MTU 83 2.0 u146.5
Final Nov 21
LAS 67 -1.5 o144.0
UCSD 72 1.5 u144.0
Final Nov 21
OKST 78 2.0 o163.0
FAU 86 -2.0 u163.0
Final Nov 21
USF 74 -6.5 o145.5
PORT 68 6.5 u145.5
Final Nov 21
ECU 78 -4.0 o135.0
JVST 86 4.0 u135.0
Final Nov 21
MONM 62 4.5 o146.5
YSU 72 -4.5 u146.5
Final OT Nov 21
HALL 69 7.0 o126.0
VCU 66 -7.0 u126.0
Final Nov 21
BRAD 82 -7.0 o135.5
TXST 68 7.0 u135.5
Final Nov 21
TOL 103 -13.0 o154.5
STET 78 13.0 u154.5
Final Nov 21
RMU 86 9.5 o151.5
COR 76 -9.5 u151.5
Final Nov 21
UNCG 58 17.5 o146.5
IND 69 -17.5 u146.5
Final Nov 21
RAD 51 22.0 o144.5
CLEM 79 -22.0 u144.5
Final Nov 21
SYR 66 11.0 o155.0
TEX 70 -11.0 u155.0
Final Nov 21
NIAG 73 14.0 o136.5
KENT 76 -14.0 u136.5
Final 0OT Nov 21
BAY 99 -2.5 o150.5
SJU 98 2.5 u150.5
Final Nov 21
EMU 68 7.0 o134.5
OAK 64 -7.0 u134.5
Final Nov 21
BRY 66 -12.5 o153.0
STONE 67 12.5 u153.0
Final Nov 21
MER 72 18.5 o150.0
SCAR 84 -18.5 u150.0
Final Nov 21
JOHNSU 52 -0.0 o0.0
CHAT 72 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 21
EDW 59 -0.0 o0.0
UNF 108 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 21
NJIT 64 12.5 o135.0
BUCK 81 -12.5 u135.0
Final OT Nov 21
SEMO 77 1.5 o149.5
CARK 73 -1.5 u149.5
Final OT Nov 21
PRE 58 8.5 o135.0
SFA 55 -8.5 u135.0
Final Nov 21
TRN 78 -0.0 o0.0
SHSU 105 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 21
VAN 73 2.5 o150.5
NEV 71 -2.5 u150.5
Final Nov 21
CCSU 54 -2.0 o142.0
SH 67 2.0 u142.0
Final Nov 21
UTM 77 11.5 o155.5
AMCC 81 -11.5 u155.5
Final Nov 21
ORU 68 21.5 o149.5
MISS 100 -21.5 u149.5
Final Nov 21
TXWES 66 -0.0 o0.0
UNT 73 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 21
LNDNWD 64 9.5 o145.0
VALP 77 -9.5 u145.0
Final Nov 21
MINCR 60 -0.0 o0.0
NDSU 67 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 21
PRIN 62 -7.5 o152.5
WRST 80 7.5 u152.5
Final Nov 21
46 -0.0 o0.0
WIU 73 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 21
TAMCOM 56 24.5 o144.5
OKLA 84 -24.5 u144.5
Final Nov 21
TST 49 31.0 o147.0
MICH 72 -31.0 u147.0
Final Nov 21
TTU 77 -10.5 o149.5
STJOE 78 10.5 u149.5
Final Nov 21
GRAM 58 23.5 o152.5
UNM 80 -23.5 u152.5
Final Nov 21
TENN 64 -12.5 o126.5
UVA 42 12.5 u126.5
Final Nov 21
EWU 81 14.0 o158.5
WSU 96 -14.0 u158.5
Final Nov 21
ORE 78 -6.5 o139.5
ORST 75 6.5 u139.5
Final Nov 21
AFA 69 16.0 o136.0
CAL 78 -16.0 u136.0
Final Nov 21
MEM 68 2.0 o154.5
SF 64 -2.0 u154.5
Michigan 8th Big Ten17-13
North Carolina 2nd Atlantic Coast23-8

Michigan @ North Carolina preview

Dean Smith Center

Last Meeting ( Nov 28, 2019 ) North Carolina 64, Michigan 73

No. 24 Michigan and North Carolina might look a little bit different when they square off Wednesday night in Chapel Hill, N.C.

With more time than usual to prepare for their matchup in the ACC-Big Ten Challenge, defensive adjustments and potential rotation changes were addressed.

That's what each team needed, according to their coaches.

Michigan played four games in nine nights prior to the break in the schedule. Two teams now ranked in the Top 25 knocked off the Wolverines. They fell to Arizona and suffered a two-point home loss to Seton Hall during that stretch.

"To get away from the game and be able to enjoy your family," Michigan coach Juwan Howard said of the gap in the schedule. "To reset the mind because they need it."

North Carolina's Hubert Davis said the plan for his team during the layoff was to bond on and off the court.

"We're going to practice a lot. We're going to get better," Davis said. "I'm excited about this (time) to get better as a team."

Michigan (4-2) recovered from an 18-point loss to Arizona by defeating Tarleton State 65-54 last Wednesday.

The Wolverines had three freshmen among their key contributors in their most-recent game: Caleb Houstan, Moussa Diabate and Frankie Collins.

"They're tough competitors who want to do whatever it takes to help the team win," Howard said.

Collins is a reserve, but Howard described him as "locked in."

Turnovers have been troublesome for the Wolverines. Meanwhile, North Carolina's problems might in part stem from not being disruptive enough at the defensive end. Davis reminded his players no team is a finished product in November or December.

"Very few teams, if any, are settled right now (through six games)," Davis said.

North Carolina is 3-0 at home, though wins against Brown and UNC Asheville came in less-than-impressive fashion.

"We've got to get better, plain and simple," Tar Heels forward Brady Manek said. "I don't know what it is. We've got to play better."

The Tar Heels haven't played since the UNC Asheville game Nov. 23.

"It was more about us figuring out what we didn't do and just correcting it," North Carolina forward Armando Bacot said. "We really realized we dropped the ball (in losses to Purdue and Tennessee), but we feel that's something that will help us out further into the season. We have to have a lot different approach."

That's the feeling that has spread among the Tar Heels after their shortcomings.

"We were not a team," Manek said. "We did not play as a team. ... We have to fix whatever is wrong. Everybody is down on us. We're down on ourselves. We have to get out of this hole that we dug for ourselves."

Manek said the Tar Heels can't waste any time snapping out of the doldrums with the Wolverines in town.

"If we're down at half, they're going to make us pay because they're going to be a good team," Manek said.

The Wolverines have won the past two meetings with North Carolina, most recently in November 2019.

Howard was part of the Fab Five with the Wolverines in the early 1990s. He was a sophomore on the Michigan team that finished runner-up to North Carolina by virtue of the 1993 NCAA title game loss.

--Field Level Media

Pages Related to This Topic